Every benchmark run is a row: what changed, on which set, how Clara scored, and what Fede thinks.
v1 prototype · 40 runs · design: benchmark framework, section 8
In one line: 40 runs so far, 10 of them exploratory (run before the frozen set exists). Judge: Fable 5.1 only. From v1 on: quality is pairwise against the baseline; never-do rules are code checks that fail on any.
| Surface | Today's production | Run |
|---|---|---|
| Tenant text, should we reply (primary) | noise rate 82 of 96 (85%): the writer replies where the office already answered within 48 h; 50 unknown left out. Live it is 0 because the tenant switch is off | baseline-v1 |
| Tenant text, is the reply helpful | 72 of 119 replies (61%) answer without "I've told the team" | baseline-v1 |
| Tenant repair text (smoke, 20) | noise 10 of 10; helpful 18 of 20; filing matches the office on 7 of 17 (both 1, neither 6) | baseline-v1 |
| Prospect first email (51) | 24 of 51 held by send checks; 69% clean on code checks | baseline-v1 |
To record one: set fede and fede_notes on the example in artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-24.json, run node bin/render-clara-bench.mjs, commit both files. Words that count as a call are in artifacts/clara-bench/SCHEMA.md.
The question: on real tenant texts from the last week, does New Clara (the decomposed prompt on Opus 5.5) make the same call as today's Clara (today's prompt on Sonnet 5), and where they differ, who is right? The answer: they make a different call on 19 of 46 texts, mostly because New Clara goes silent far more often (28 vs 12), including on a plain repair report (#1), so your verdicts on the 19 below decide it, not the judge.
| On 46 tenant texts | Clara today | New Clara |
|---|---|---|
| Replies (would send now) | 7 | 4 |
| Holds (writes a draft, pages the team or a person already answered) | 27 | 14 |
| Stays silent | 12 | 28 |
| Different call from the other | 19 of 46 | |
In 16 of the 19, New Clara stays silent where today's Clara holds (12) or replies (4). In the other 3, New Clara answers herself where today's Clara only passes it to the team (#7, #14, #19). Western Slope and Situs Group, Oct 20 to 25; texts from the night shadow run, replayed on both. 50 more texts were left out because the sender is not an active tenant at that home (no reply from either). No judge score here: the judge has been wrong before, so your call is the column.
How to grade: reply in chat by number, for example "3 today right", "7 new right", "12 both wrong: should file a work order". Drafts are shown exactly as each Clara wrote them, dashes included. #20 to #25 are controls where both made the same call, to check the agreements are right too. Spanish texts are left in Spanish.
They tried but said they would have to have Sparky come out. Currently, the living room light does not work
Thanks for the update, Stephanie. Sorry the living room light's still out, I've noted on WO KRIT-6094 that the tech said an outside electrician needs to come finish it, and flagged it for the team to get that scheduled.
No message.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 1 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
Thank you! The only time I'm unavailable today is 1-2p. For the pests, Marcus did come out and spray. He told me to wait 2 weeks to assess effectiveness. So far, it seems effective outside but I'm seeing continued activity outside.
Got it, Stephanie — I've noted you're free today except 1-2pm for the Sparky visit on the light switch panel. And I've logged that the pest treatment seems to be working inside but you're still seeing activity outside, so that's on record for the 2-week check-in.
No message.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 2 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
Will the new lease be on the portal? Or do you send me an email?
That's something Bev and the team will confirm with you directly, Kyle — I don't have that detail on file myself.
No message.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 3 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
Will my security deposit just roll over to the new lease?
Good question on both, Kyle. I don't have the specifics on how the renewal paperwork gets delivered or how deposits carry forward, so I'll check with the team and get back to you on that.
No message.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 3 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
Perfect!! Let me know once it's on the portal and I'll get it handled before this month is over to get the discount
Sounds good! The team will follow up once it's ready on the portal so you can get that taken care of in time for the discount.
No message.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 40 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
I think they're going to replace the whole fridge. Theresa ice machine isn't working- but someone did show up to fix it. I don't know how that looks on your end whether you mark it as fixed since we have come to a conclusion. Either way I appreciate you guys checking in!
Thanks for the update, Samantha. I've flagged for the team that it sounds like a full fridge replacement is in the works rather than the ice machine being fully fixed, so they can confirm the plan and timing with you.
No message.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 14 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
Good afternoon! This is Lethida Anderson in Unit 202. I sent an email request yesterday. Could you please confirm receipt of the email. Thank you!
I've let the property team know you sent an email yesterday and asked them to confirm receipt and follow up with you on it.
Hi Lethida, I don't see a new request from yesterday on your account, and I can't see the office email inbox, so I can't confirm it came through. If you tell me what your email was about, I can take care of it here. If it's a repair, I can get it in for you today.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 2 h later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
Not at the moment, but thank you for asking ☺️
Thanks for letting us know, Kayla.
No message.
What the office actually did: unknown
Fede: ___
Hello, was just wonder when we'd receive the email for the link to start the renewal process?
I don't have a timeline for when that renewal email goes out, but I've flagged it with the property team and they'll follow up with you on it.
No message.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 4 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
The last document won't load
I've let the property team know the last renewal document isn't loading for you, and they'll go over it with you.
No message.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 34 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
Yes! That has been fixed
Glad to hear the light switch panel is all fixed now! Thanks for confirming.
No message.
What the office actually did: unknown
Fede: ___
Como podría saber cuáles son los espacios permitidos!
Le aviso que no tengo el detalle de cuáles espacios están designados para visitantes, pero voy a revisarlo con el equipo de la propiedad y le doy seguimiento.
No message.
What the office actually did: unknown
Fede: ___
The leak does seem to be fixed
Glad to hear the leak is fixed, David. I'll let the team know everything checked out.
No message.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 1 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
The exterminator coming sprayed but there's more bugs than there ever was still have them and there's many more I don't know what they are or where they coming from but he didn't take care of the problem
That's been sent to the property team, and they'll follow up with you on getting the pest issue properly handled. Let me know if anything changes in the meantime.
That's frustrating, Shari, especially since there are more bugs now than before the spraying. COUR-6055 for the bed bugs shows as completed after the visit on Tuesday, Oct 20, so this needs another look. Could you send a photo of the bugs or where you're seeing them? It'll help the exterminator work out what they are.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 13 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
I was able to get the lease signed on my phone.
Glad that worked out, Sam. Since you were able to sign on your phone, there's no need for Deiby's drop-off or pickup. Thanks for getting that finalized.
No message.
What the office actually did: unknown
Fede: ___
Hey I just talked to Midiam at the office and she said they didn't print our check do you know why
I don't have visibility into the office's check printing, so I can't say why it wasn't done, but I've flagged this with the property team and they'll get back to you on it.
No message.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 4 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
Yes we work hard to get everything cleaned and not get paid that's not right I guess I have to wait till next Friday not happy 😢
I'm sorry about the trouble, Lorraine. I don't have visibility into the check printing process myself, but I've passed this along, and the property team will follow up with you on it.
No message.
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 10 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
Yes
Thanks for confirming, I've noted that on the work order so the team has your update. Let me know if anything else comes up with it.
No message.
What the office actually did: unknown
Fede: ___
hello! no one's come to winterize our swamp cooler yet, we were wanting to check in about when someone will be out ?
I didn't find a work order on file for the swamp cooler winterization, so I can't give you a specific date yet. I've flagged it with the property team and they'll go over it with you.
Hi Mikaela, I checked your account and don't see a work order for winterizing the swamp cooler, so nothing is scheduled for it yet. Would you like a request put in for the winterization?
What the office actually did: unknown
Fede: ___
I'll
Hey Bianca, looks like your message might've gotten cut off. What were you about to say?
Hi Bianca, it looks like your message got cut off after "I'll." What can I help you with?
What the office actually did: unknown
Fede: ___
It is, thank you!
I also just wanted to communicate that I will be paying the past due rent, I am sorry it's late.
Glad to hear the oven's all fixed up! And no worries at all, thanks for the heads up on the rent, we appreciate you staying on top of it.
Thanks for letting us know, Maria. I'm glad the oven is working again. As of Oct 8, the balance on your account shows $3,996.98, and you can pay it through your resident portal or by contacting the office.
What the office actually did: unknown
Fede: ___
Thank you! Please message or call with an ETA.
Hi Stephanie, work order KRIT-6122 is scheduled for Monday 10/26 with Western Slope Property Management, but I don't have a specific time window on file. I've noted your request for an ETA call or text on the order for the team to see.
Hi Stephanie, work order KRIT-6122 is scheduled for tomorrow, Monday, October 26, with Western Slope Property Management. I don't have an arrival time on it yet. I've added a note to the work order asking for a message or call with an ETA before they come.
What the office actually did: unknown
Fede: ___
Disculpa quería avisarles que el día 1 de noviembre aré el cumpleaños de mi hijo no sé que inconvenientes hayan por los carros que lleguen?
Buenas tardes, Dayanna. Sobre el referido, le voy a comentar al equipo de administración y ellos revisarán eso con usted. Sobre el cumpleaños de su hijo el 1 de noviembre y los autos de sus invitados, no tengo la política de estacionamiento en mi sistema, así que también se lo paso al equipo para que le confirmen.
Buenas tardes, Dayanna. Gracias por la recomendación y por avisarnos de la fiesta del 1 de noviembre. Ya le pasé las dos cosas al equipo de la propiedad para que le confirmen lo del crédito y si hay alguna indicación de estacionamiento para sus invitados. ¿Me podría dar el nombre de la persona que recomendó, para que la identifiquen más rápido?
What the office actually did: a person answered in AppFolio 87 min later (their words are not in this data)
Fede: ___
That $44.19 charge is still on my account. And I'm not see the credit anymore..
I don't have a line item breakdown on your account, so I can't confirm what that $44.19 is or where the credit went. I'll check with the team and get back to you.
Hi Lily, I've passed the $44.19 charge and the missing credit to the property team, and they'll follow up with you. Your total balance shows $97.25 as of Oct 22. I can only see that total, not what's in it or whether a credit went through, so the team will need to review the charge and the credit.
What the office actually did: unknown
Fede: ___
Perfect!! Ty!!
No message.
No message.
What the office actually did: unknown
Fede: ___
Does splitting the prompt change what Clara writes? No: every measure is inside production's own spread.
51 real first emails, all on claude-sonnet-5 (production's leasing model). Production ran three times to measure how much it differs from itself; the split (today's text word for word under four headers) ran once. Full numbers: run detail.
| On 51 first emails | Production, 3 runs | Split |
|---|---|---|
| Held by send checks | 26 / 19 / 21 | 22 |
| Invented facts | 9 / 8 / 8 | 9 |
| Em dash | 4 / 2 / 3 | 5 |
| Told the team | 0 / 1 / 1 | 0 |
| Same email as production run A (judge) | 16 and 18 of 51 | 20 of 51 |
| Emails where this run loses to both others | 5 / 4 / 6 | 4 |
One count is one over the bar written before the run: the split saved the prospect's details on 30 emails, run A on 25 (allowed gap 4); the three production runs spread 25 to 29.
Five of Fede's seven graded first emails can be rebuilt (n27 and n33 cannot). His verdict was on an earlier comparison; the question here is only whether the split falls below production on them. Judge: Fable 5.1, both orders.
| Example | Fede's verdict | Production same as itself (of 3 pairs) | Split same as production (of 3) | Production better than split (of 3) | Split better (of 3) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n25 | "production better" | 1 of 3 | 0 of 3 | 0 of 3 | 3 of 3 | Not below. A stale case: a tour is already booked for Oct 7 and every arm ignores it; the judge prefers the split for not quoting new times over the booking. |
| n26 | "production better (tone)" | 1 of 3 | 2 of 3 | 2 of 3 | 0 of 3 | Close: production wins 2 of 3 against the split, 1 of 3 against itself; the fresh-run emails are near word for word the same. |
| n29 | "both wrong" | 0 of 3 | 1 of 3 | 0 of 3 | 2 of 3 | Not below. Production runs disagree with each other here on every pair. |
| n30 | "today better" (the Opus arm said "I'll check with the team" on the special) | 0 of 3 | 1 of 3 | 0 of 3 | 0 of 3 | Not below; both quote the special and offer times. |
| n34 | "both wrong" ("we always need to offer real availability") | 0 of 3 | 0 of 3 | 2 of 3 | 1 of 3 | Same as noise: one production run beats another on 2 of 3 pairs here too. |
These are the emails where production matched itself but the split did not. The emails below are a fresh run (Oct 27, same model, nothing sent), because the scored emails were lost; the line under each says what the judge saw in the scored run. Names kept, phones and emails removed. How to grade: reply in chat by number, for example "3 today" or "1 tie".
Hi Angele,
Unit 575-204 at Northridge Apartments (565 Redcliff Cir) is no longer available, but we do have a 3-bedroom open now, running $2,400 to $2,650 a month. Tours here are self-guided: you go in on your own at the time you pick, and I'll send you the lockbox code. What day and time works for you?
Hi Angele,
Unit 575-204 at Northridge Apartments (565 Redcliff Cir) is no longer available, but we do have a 3-bedroom, 2-bath open now at 1,100 sq ft, running $2,400 to $2,650 a month. It's a self-guided visit, so you can go in on your own any day and at any time that works for you, and I'll send you the lockbox code for it. What day and time would you like?
What the judge saw in the scored run: In the scored run the split skipped the open-units lookup and left out the rent range and size that production gave in all three of its runs. In this fresh run both looked it up and both give the range.
Fede:
Hi Jed,
Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes at 624 Eisenhauer Street. Unit 405 is available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath home with 1,528 square feet at $2,495 a month, and it comes with a move-in special: get one half month of rent free.
You're all set for your tour this Thursday, October 1 at 9:00 AM at the property [em dash] looking forward to showing you around then.
Hi Jed,
Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo, and there's a move-in special running right now: get 1 half month of rent free. You're all set for your tour this Thursday, October 1 at 9:00 AM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, looking forward to showing you around!
What the judge saw in the scored run: Wording only. In the scored run the split did not say the home is available now; production said it in all three runs. In this fresh run both say it.
Fede:
Hi Riley,
Pomona Park Townhomes is available now, a 3-bedroom at $2,495 a month, and right now there's a move in special: get 1 half month of rent free.
I have Tuesday, October 27 between 9:00 AM and 11:15 AM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, whichever works best for you.
Hi Riley,
Thanks for reaching out about 624 Eisenhauer Street, it's available now, a 3-bedroom at $2,495/mo, and it comes with a move-in special: Move-In Special! Get 1 HALF MONTH of Rent FREE! I'd love to show you around, I have Tuesday, October 27 between 9:00 AM and 11:15 AM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 10:30 AM and 12:15 PM, whichever works better for you?
What the judge saw in the scored run: In the scored run the split looked up units, added baths, size and special terms that production never gave (a 12-month lease, an October 31 deadline), and named the home by its street address. Production did none of that in 4 of 4 runs. In this fresh run the split again names it by its street address and pastes the special in capitals.
Fede:
Hi Tristan, thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments. We have a studio open now, running $950 to $1,000 a month at 386 to 444 square feet, and right now new 12 month leases come with one month free. What would you like to do next with it?
Hi Tristan,
Thanks for your interest in Camellia Apartments, we have studios available now running $950-$1,000/mo (386-444 sq ft), with one month free on a 12-month lease, which would line up nicely with your December 2nd move-in, so let me know what you'd like to do next.
What the judge saw in the scored run: In the scored run the split used an em dash; production did not in any of its three runs. In this fresh run the split has no dash but is one long run-on sentence, and it is held.
Fede:
Can Clara move to a new model on today's prompt with nothing else changed? Each arm is judged against production's own reply on the same turn, in the same window, and held to production against itself.
| Arm | Bar | Lines that failed |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-5 (production run 2) | PASS | no line failed |
| claude-opus-5-5 | PASS | no line failed |
Review set: 12 examples, phones and emails masked, names kept. Grade in chat: "#U4 today" (production better), "#U7 new" (the new model better), "tie", "wrong" (both wrong). Ledger: artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-30-upgrade-pinned-oct30.json.
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Northridge Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Arturo, Thanks for your interest in Northridge Apartments at 565 Redcliff Cir. We have a 3 bedroom, 2 bath home open now, 1,100 square feet, at $2,400 per month. Tours here are self guided, so you can go see it any day, any time that works for you, and I will send you the lockbox code ahead of your visit. What day and time would you like to come by? | Hi Arturo, Thanks for reaching out about Northridge Apartments at 565 Redcliff Cir, it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,100 sq ft at $2,400 a month. No specials running right now, but the pricing is competitive for the area. Tours here are self-guided, so you can go in on your own any time that works for you, day or night. What day and time would you like to see it? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same home facts and open self-guided tour ask, but Email 1 includes the required lockbox-code line while Email 2 omits it and pads with an unsourced 'competitive pricing' remark. / order B picked 2: Both give the same home, size, rent and self-guided any-time invitation, but Email 2 adds the required lockbox-code explanation and skips Email 1's unsupported 'competitive pricing' filler. Drops: the lockbox code will be sent to them ahead of the self-guided visit
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'm interested in a studio apartment (unit 206/606) at Camellia Apartments and am looking to move in around October 14. Do you offer 6-month lease options? I'd also like to know what additional monthly fees are charged besides the base rent, such as utilities, parking, trash, or other community fees. Thank you!. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 1. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Queen, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 206 at Camellia Apartments, it's a studio, 1 bath with 386 sq ft, available now at $1,000/mo, and right now new 12 month leases also come with one month free. We do offer 6 month leases here, at the same rental rate as a 12 month lease, so that timing works fine. Beyond rent, water, sewer, trash and heat are billed monthly through a third party, Conservice, along with your rent, and studio residents have typically paid around $40 to $50 a month depending on usage. Electric is your own account with Xcel Energy and internet is your own as well. On site parking runs $80/mo for a surface spot or $95/mo for a garage spot, though it's currently full with a waitlist, in the meantime the nail salon next door rents overflow spots for $100/mo through our office. There's no admin fee, and the application fee is $38 per applicant. You're all set for your tour on Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM at Camellia Apartments, 1235 Grant Street, looking forward to seeing you then. | Hi Queen, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 206 at Camellia Apartments, it's a studio, 1 bath with 386 sq ft at $1,000/mo, available now for your October 14 move in. Yes, we do offer 6-month leases here, at the same rate as 12-month leases. If a 12-month term works better for you, we're also running a move-in special of one month free right now. On monthly costs beyond rent: water, sewer, trash, and heat are billed through a third-party company, Conservice, and studio residents typically see around $40 to $50 a month on that bill depending on usage. Electric is your own account with Xcel Energy, and internet is separate as well. Parking runs $80/mo for a surface spot or $95/mo for garage, though on-site parking is full right now, so you'd be added to the waitlist, with overflow parking available next door at $100/mo in the meantime. There's no admin fee here. I have tour times available Friday, October 30 between 10:15 AM and 1:45 PM, or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM, would either of those work for you to come see it? |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both answer the 6-month and fee questions accurately, but Email 2 contradicts the tour record by offering fresh slots instead of confirming the booked tour, while Email 1 gets that right. / order B picked 2: Email 2 answers the lease and fee questions fully and correctly confirms the existing tour, while Email 1 ignores the booked tour and offers slots weeks later as if they still needed one. Drops: Confirmation that they are already booked for a tour Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM at 1235 Grant Street
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Cylus, Pomona Park Townhomes has a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath townhome open now, 1,450 square feet, at $2,495/mo, and if you sign a 12 month lease by October 31, 2026, you get half a month's rent free. You're already all set for your tour this Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street. Looking forward to seeing you then! | Hi Cylus, Thanks for your interest in Pomona Park Townhomes! We have a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath townhome at 624 Eisenhauer Street, 1,450 sq ft, open now from $2,395/mo, and it comes with a move in special: half a month of rent free if you sign a 12 month lease by October 31, 2026. You're all set for your tour there on Tuesday, October 20, 2026 at 5:00 PM, looking forward to showing you around! |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 pairs the special with the correct $2,495 rent and keeps the booked tour, while Email 2 misattributes the special to the $2,395 starting price, which the records say it does not carry. / order B picked 2: Both confirm the existing Tuesday 5:00 PM tour and name one home warmly, but Email 2 quotes the special beside the $2,495 rent it actually belongs to while Email 1 pairs it with the $2,395 home the records exclude.
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| 363 Ember Ln is open now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath home with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo, and it comes with the Grand Opening Special: 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd just cover water, electricity and internet), running until November 15 or while supplies last. Good news on the lease length too: we're currently offering longer terms of 14 to 18 months as a promotion, so an 18-month lease works here. As for your pet, cats and dogs are welcome with a $300 pet deposit and $35/month pet rent per pet — since yours is listed as "Other," I'd want to confirm the specific type works with the policy, and that's easy to sort out at your tour. For tomorrow evening specifically, I don't have anything open, but I do have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM or between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM, and Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Would either of those work, and if so, what time within that window? I'll also need your full name to get the tour booked. | Hi there, For 363 Ember Ln, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath home at 1,289 sq ft, $2,550/mo, with the current special: 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd cover water, electricity, and internet) — this special runs through November 15 or while supplies last. On the 18-month lease, that works: we're currently offering longer lease terms of 14 to 18 months as a promotion. As for your pet, could you let me know the species? Our standard pet policy covers cats and dogs (two-pet limit, $300 refundable pet deposit, $35/month pet rent per pet), and I want to make sure that's the right fit for yours. For the tour, tomorrow evening isn't an option, but I do have Friday, October 30 between 1:30 and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM — would either of those work, and if so, what time within the window? |
| checks failed: no_em_dash, no_kb_deflection; tools: check_availability, update_prospect | checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: check_availability, update_prospect |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 states availability, gives all tour windows and reads warmer; its only slip is re-asking for a name already provided, which is less harmful than Email 2 omitting the open status and a tour window. / order B picked 2: Email 2 states the home is open, reads naturally and offers the full tour windows, while its one slip (re-asking the name) is less damaging than Email 1 omitting availability in an awkward fragment opening. Drops: that 363 Ember Ln is available/open now; the Friday, October 30 10:00 AM–12:00 PM tour window
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Cylus, Pomona Park Townhomes has a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath townhome open now, 1,450 square feet, at $2,495/mo, and if you sign a 12 month lease by October 31, 2026, you get half a month's rent free. You're already all set for your tour this Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street. Looking forward to seeing you then! | Hi Cylus, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes at 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now as a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft, from $2,395/mo. You're all set for your tour on Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, and a leasing agent will meet you at the home. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both confirm the home is open and the Tuesday tour correctly, but Email 1 gives the sourced special beside its rent while Email 2 drops it, which a first email must include. / order B picked 2: Both correctly confirm the existing tour and name one home, but Email 2 includes the live special beside its rent as required and closes more warmly, while Email 1 skips the special altogether. Drops: the move-in special: half a month's rent free with a 12-month lease signed by October 31, 2026 (on the $2,495 listing)
Inquiry: <user_message> I am interested in touring 2980 Emerald Cir.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Kyle, The home at 2980 Emerald Circle is open now, a 4 bedroom, 2.5 bath, 1,477 sq ft at $2,300/mo. For a tour, I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works for you? | Hi Kyle, Thanks for reaching out about 2980 Emerald Circle. It's available now: a 4-bedroom, 2.5-bath home with 1,477 sq ft at $2,300/mo. I can show it to you Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same home facts correctly, but Email 1 offers every open tour window while Email 2 silently drops the Friday afternoon block, giving Kyle fewer real options. / order B picked 2: Both are correct and short, but email 2 offers every open tour window while email 1 drops the Friday afternoon block, so email 2 gives Kyle more to pick from. Drops: Friday, October 30 afternoon tour window between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Natalee, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates, the home at 363 Ember Ln is available now, a brand new 3 bedroom, 2 bath duplex with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo, complete with its own 2 car garage and fenced backyard. It also comes with the Grand Opening Special: 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd cover water, electricity and internet), running through November 15 or while supplies last. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Natalee, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. It's available now: a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,228 sq ft at $2,300/mo. A leasing agent will meet you at the home for the tour. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 answers the actual inquiry with the sourced special and home features, while Email 2 is correct but skips the promotion the person wrote in about. / order B picked 2: Email 2 answers what Natalee actually asked about — the brand-new duplex with the free-rent special, garage and yard — with sourced rent, size, special terms and tour times, while Email 1 skips the special entirely. Drops: Grand Opening Special (2 months free rent plus sewer and trash for the first term, through Nov 15 or while supplies last) that the person asked about; garage and fenced yard the person asked about
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I would love to schedule time to view this property. Additionally, if my partner and I like it potentially apply as well. Thank you for your time and consideration. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Amy, 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available, so there's nothing to view there. The good news is 2841 Morningside Court is still open, and you're already all set for your tour there tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29th, at 5:30 PM. If you and your partner love it, you're set on the application front too. It already went out for Morningside Court, so you can fill it out together whenever you're ready. | Hi Amy, Thanks for reaching out about 2978 Emerald Circle. That home is no longer available. You're already set to see two similar homes, both 4-bedrooms at $2,300/mo. The first is 2841 Morningside Court, a 4-bed, 2-bath, tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29 at 5:30 PM. The second is 2980 Emerald Circle, a 4-bed, 2.5-bath, on Friday, October 2 at 1:30 PM. If you and your partner like one of them, you'd each fill out an application, and the fee is $40 per applicant. Once everything is in, a decision takes 1 to 2 business days. Looking forward to showing you around! |
| checks failed: none; tools: | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, forward_to_property_manager, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 answers both asks with the rents, both confirmed tours and the real $40 fee, while Email 1 omits the rent and Friday tour; Email 2 only slips by not noting the application was already sent. / order B picked 2: Email 2 sticks to one home, correctly reflects that the application already went out, and reads short and natural, while Email 1 rosters two homes and ignores the sent application, though it does carry the rent Email 2 omits. Drops: the application for 2841 Morningside Court has already been sent to her
Inquiry: <user_message> I'm interested in this property Zumper Listing: https://www.zumper.com/listings/24011074p/3-bedroom-foresight-park-grand-junction-co. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Mallary, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available, but we do have another 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath home open now, 1,450 square feet at $2,395/mo, and it comes with a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and get half a month's rent free. For your October 1st move-in, I'd love to get you in to see it. I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Mallary, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available, but we have a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft open now, starting at $2,395/mo. You're all set for your tour on Saturday, October 3 at 11:00 AM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, and a leasing agent will meet you at the home. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 correctly honors the confirmed tour and states only sourced facts, while Email 1 contradicts the tour record and misattributes the special, which outweighs Email 2's omission of the special. / order B picked 1: Email 1 correctly confirms the booked tour and states only sourced facts, while Email 2 contradicts the tour record by offering fresh times a month after her move-in and misattributes the special. Drops: The move-in special (half a month's rent free with a 12-month lease signed by October 31, 2026) on the open 3-bedroom listed at $2,495/mo
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| 363 Ember Ln is open now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath home with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo, and it comes with the Grand Opening Special: 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd just cover water, electricity and internet), running until November 15 or while supplies last. Good news on the lease length too: we're currently offering longer terms of 14 to 18 months as a promotion, so an 18-month lease works here. As for your pet, cats and dogs are welcome with a $300 pet deposit and $35/month pet rent per pet — since yours is listed as "Other," I'd want to confirm the specific type works with the policy, and that's easy to sort out at your tour. For tomorrow evening specifically, I don't have anything open, but I do have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM or between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM, and Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Would either of those work, and if so, what time within that window? I'll also need your full name to get the tour booked. | Hi Michael, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 363 Ember Ln at Ember Estates (374 Ember Lane). It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo. It also comes with the Grand Opening Special: 2 months free rent, plus sewer and trash included for your first term. You'd cover water, electricity and internet, and the special runs until Nov 15 or until supplies last. You can get an 18-month lease here. Leases of 14 to 18 months are part of a current promotion. Cats and dogs are welcome, up to two pets. The pet deposit is $300 total and refundable, and pet rent is $35 a month per pet. Every pet is registered through OurPetPolicy before move-in. What kind of pet do you have? Tomorrow evening isn't open for a tour. I can show you the home Friday, October 30 between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: no_em_dash, no_kb_deflection; tools: check_availability, update_prospect | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Both cover the home, special, 18-month lease, pets and tomorrow-evening answer, but Email 1 needlessly asks for a name already on file while Email 2 reads warmer and only omits one tour window. / order B picked 1: Email 1 greets Michael by name and covers everything he asked with only a minor missing tour window, while Email 2 asks for a name he already gave, which the records forbid and reads as careless. Drops: Friday, October 30 morning window 10:00 AM–12:00 PM
Inquiry: <user_message> I found 486-32 1/8 32 1 8 Rd on Homes.com and would like to learn more about it. Thanks! I would like to request a tour. Requested Date & Time: September 22 at 04:00 PM. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Reabecca, You're all set, your tour at 486 32 1/8 Road is confirmed for Tuesday, September 22 at 4:00 PM. Looking forward to seeing you then! | Hi Reabecca, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road. The home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, save_prospect, forward_to_property_manager, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 gives the one fact she most needs (the home is gone) while Email 1 would send her to tour an unavailable home, though Email 2 should have addressed her booked tour. / order B picked 1: Email 1 gives the essential sourced fact that the home is gone, while Email 2 cheerfully confirms a visit to an unavailable home and leaves her thinking it is still open. Drops: Their Tuesday, September 22 at 4:00 PM tour at 486 32 1/8 Road is on file (any word on the tour they requested)
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Mary Ann, Thanks for your interest in Ember Estates! There's no 2 bedroom home open right now, but we do have a 3 bedroom, 2 bath home with 1,228 square feet open now, starting at $2,300 a month. I have tour times open Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Mary Ann, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. It's available now as a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,228 sq ft, from $2,300/mo. There's no 2-bedroom open at Ember Estates right now, so the 3-bedroom is the size to look at. The 3-bedroom at $2,550/mo has a Grand Opening Special: 2 months free rent, plus sewer and trash included for your first term. You'd pay for water, electricity and internet. The special runs until Nov 15 or while supplies last. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 answers the free-rent question she actually asked with the sourced special beside its rent, while Email 1 drops the special; both are otherwise factually correct and offer the same tour days. / order B picked 1: Email 1 answers the promotion the person asked about with the real special and its terms, while Email 2 is warmer and tighter but drops that key fact.
Can Clara move to a new model on today's prompt with nothing else changed? Each arm is judged against production's own reply on the same turn, in the same window, and held to production against itself.
| Arm | Bar | Lines that failed |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-5 (production run 2) | PASS | no line failed |
| claude-opus-5-5 | FAIL | never_do: no_em_dash 0 new (run 2: 1); no_team_told 1 new (run 2: 0); offers_tour_times 0 new (run 2: 1) |
Review set: 12 examples, phones and emails masked, names kept. Grade in chat: "#U4 today" (production better), "#U7 new" (the new model better), "tie", "wrong" (both wrong). Ledger: artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-30-upgrade-pinned-oct30-r2.json.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I would love to schedule time to view this property. Additionally, if my partner and I like it potentially apply as well. Thank you for your time and consideration. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Amy, 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available, but you're all set for 2841 Morningside Court, which is open now — your tour there is confirmed for tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29th, at 5:30 PM, so feel free to bring your partner along. Once you've both had a look and decide it's the right fit, just let me know and I'll get the application moving for you. See you tomorrow! | Hi Amy, 2978 Emerald Circle isn't available right now. But you and I already got you through 2841 Morningside Court on your tour, so I'd love to hear what you and your partner thought of it! If it's a fit, I'm happy to get the application going for both of you whenever you're ready, just let me know. |
| checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: update_prospect | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 correctly restates the confirmed tour and answers her viewing and application asks, while Email 2 wrongly claims the tour already happened and never confirms when she is seeing the home. / order B picked 2: Email 2 correctly tells Amy 2978 Emerald Circle is gone and that her tour at 2841 Morningside Court is confirmed for tomorrow at 5:30 PM, while Email 1 wrongly treats that tour as already done and leaves her unsure whether her viewing exists. Drops: The tour at 2841 Morningside Court is confirmed for tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29 at 5:30 PM; Her partner is welcome to come along to the tour
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about 565 Redcliff Cir unit 585-201.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Tiffani, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 585-201 at Northridge Apartments (565 Redcliff Cir), it's available now, a 1-bedroom, 1-bath at $1,750/mo. You're all set for your self-guided tour on Saturday, October 17 at 10:00 AM, I'll send you the lockbox code when you're ready to go in. Let me know if you have any other questions before then. | Hi Tiffani, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 585-201 at Northridge Apartments (565 Redcliff Cir), it's available now, a 1-bedroom, 1-bath at $1,750/mo. It's a self-guided visit, so you can go in on your own any day or time that works for you, and I'll send you the lockbox code. What day and time would you like to see it? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives the home's availability, size and rent and confirms the tour already on file, while Email 2 contradicts the tour record by treating her as unbooked and asking her to pick a time. / order B picked 2: Email 2 gives the same home facts and correctly confirms the existing booked tour, while Email 1 ignores the booking and invites her to schedule one, implying her tour doesn't exist. Drops: Tiffani already has a confirmed self-guided tour Saturday, October 17 at 10:00 AM at 565 Redcliff Cir
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'm interested in a studio apartment (unit 206/606) at Camellia Apartments and am looking to move in around October 14. Do you offer 6-month lease options? I'd also like to know what additional monthly fees are charged besides the base rent, such as utilities, parking, trash, or other community fees. Thank you!. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 1. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Queen, Thanks for your interest in the studio at Camellia Apartments, 1235 Grant Street. Unit 206 is a studio, 1 bath, 386 sq ft, at $1,000/mo, available now. Camellia offers both 6-month and 12-month lease terms at the same rental rate, and right now 12-month leases come with one month free. On fees beyond base rent: utilities aren't included in rent. Water, sewer, trash, and heat run through a third-party billing company, Conservice, and studio residents have typically paid around $40 to $50 a month, though that depends on usage. Electric is your own account with Xcel Energy, and internet is also your own to set up. On-site parking runs $80/mo for a surface spot or $95/mo for garage, though it's currently full and new residents go on a waitlist; in the meantime, overflow parking is available next door at the nail salon for $100/mo, arranged through the leasing office. There's no admin fee. You're all set for your tour Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM at 1235 Grant Street. Looking forward to seeing you then! | Hi Queen, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments. Unit 206 is a studio, 1 bath with 386 sq ft at $1,000/mo and it's available now, which works well with your October 14 move in. We offer both 6-month and 12-month lease terms at the same rental rate, and 12-month leases also come with our current move-in special of 1 month free (new leases only). Beyond rent, water, sewer, trash, and heat are billed monthly through a third-party company called Conservice (that first bill usually shows up about a month after move-in, and other studio residents have seen those run around $40 to $50 a month based on usage), electric and internet are separate accounts you'd set up yourself, parking is $80/mo for a surface spot or $95/mo for garage (on-site parking is currently full with a waitlist, though overflow parking is available next door for $100/mo through our office), and there's no admin fee. I'd love to get you in to see it: I have Friday, October 30 between 10:15 AM and 1:45 PM, or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both answer the lease-term and fee questions accurately, but Email 1 correctly confirms the existing tour while Email 2 contradicts the tour record by offering fresh slots, and Email 1 is also easier to read. / order B picked 2: Email 2 answers the lease and fee questions clearly and correctly confirms the existing tour, while Email 1 ignores the booked tour and buries the fee answers in one dense run-on sentence. Drops: Confirmation of the already-booked tour Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM at 1235 Grant Street
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in NOW PRE-LEASING | 1.5 Months FREE | Brand-New Duplex Homes | Private Garages & Yards | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, That duplex listing is part of Ember Estates, and it isn't available right now. The 624 Eisenhauer Street home I mentioned is still your best option for a 3-bedroom with pet-friendly terms. Would you like to go ahead and book that tour, Thursday at 5:30 PM or Friday between 11:30 AM and 12:00 PM or 2:00 PM and 5:30 PM? | Hi Emma, That duplex listing is at Ember Estates, 374 Ember Lane, and it's no longer available right now. Let me know what you're looking for and I'm happy to help find the right fit for you. |
| checks failed: no_invented_tour_time; tools: search_properties, get_property_details | checks failed: offers_tour_times; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 redirects to the open home and offers a tour, while Email 2 gives nothing to act on and re-asks what she already told us. / order B picked 2: Email 2 says the duplex is unavailable, steers Emma to the open 624 Eisenhauer Street home and gives her tour times to pick, while Email 1 stalls by re-asking what she wants with no next step. Drops: the 624 Eisenhauer Street home is open as a 3-bedroom and pet-friendly; concrete tour times to book
Inquiry: <user_message> Carmen matched with and expressed interest in Pomona Park Townhomes | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (27 days away!) | BEDS: Studio | BUDGET: $900 | PETS: Renter has no pets | AMENITIES: On-Site Laundry. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Carmen, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available. There's no studio open here right now, but we do have a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath townhome with 1,450 square feet, starting from $2,395 a month. One of these is listed at $2,495 a month and comes with a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and get half a month's rent free. I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM to show you around. Which works better for you? | Hi Carmen, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes. Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available, and no studio is open there right now. What's open now is a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft, from $2,395/mo. The 3-bedroom listed at $2,495/mo has a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and your first month's rent is half off. I can show you around on Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or on Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails give the same facts, special terms and tour days, but Email 1 reads more naturally while Email 2 repeats the property name and uses listing-style abbreviations. / order B picked 2: Both give the same correct facts, special and tour windows (both omit the Friday afternoon slot), but Email 2 reads a touch more natural and conversational.
Inquiry: <user_message> I'm interested in this property Zumper Listing: https://www.zumper.com/listings/24011074p/3-bedroom-foresight-park-grand-junction-co. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Mallary, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available, but I do have a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath home open now, 1,450 sq ft, at $2,495/mo. It comes with a move-in special: get one half month of rent free when you sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026. For a tour, I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM, whichever works better for you? | Hi Mallary, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes. Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available, but a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft is open now from $2,395/mo. Your tour is set for Saturday, October 3 at 11:00 AM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, and a leasing agent will meet you at the home. Looking forward to showing you around. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 correctly confirms the tour already on file and quotes the open home's starting rent, while Email 1 ignores the confirmed booking and offers new slots, a serious error that outweighs its inclusion of the special. / order B picked 1: Email 1 correctly confirms her existing tour and quotes the open home, while Email 2 ignores her confirmed booking and offers fresh slots, implying it doesn't exist. Drops: the half-month-free move-in special on the open 3-bedroom listed at $2,495/mo (12-month lease signed by October 31, 2026)
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi James, Pomona Park Townhomes at 624 Eisenhauer Street is available now, a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath home with 1,450 square feet, from $2,395 a month, and it comes with a move in special right now: sign a 12 month lease by October 31 and get half a month's rent free. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi James, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes at 624 Eisenhauer Street. We have a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft available now at $2,395/mo. You're all set for your tour on Saturday, October 3 at 2:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, and I'm looking forward to showing you around. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 correctly honors the confirmed October 3 tour and states only sourced facts, while Email 1 ignores the existing booking and misattributes the special to the wrong home. / order B picked 1: Email 1 correctly confirms the existing tour and states only sourced facts, while Email 2 ignores the booked tour and misattributes the special to the wrong home. Drops: The move-in special: half a month's rent free with a 12-month lease signed by October 31, 2026 (on the $2,495 3-bedroom listing)
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Thanks for letting me know, this is for 363 Ember Ln, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo, and it's running the Grand Opening Special right now: 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd cover water, electricity and internet), good through November 15 or while supplies last. On the lease length, an 18-month term works here, this home is currently offering longer lease terms of 14 to 18 months as a promotion. Pets are welcome, cats and dogs, with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35/month pet rent per pet. If you can tell me a bit more about the pet, I can confirm anything specific to it. Tomorrow evening isn't available for a tour at this home, but I do have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which of those works best for you? | Hi Michael, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 363 Ember Ln at Ember Estates (374 Ember Lane). It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo. It comes with the Grand Opening Special: 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term, and you'd cover water, electricity and internet. The special runs until Nov 15 or supplies last. Our standard lease is 12 months, and longer leases of 14 to 18 months are offered as a promotion right now. Cats and dogs are welcome, with a refundable $300 pet deposit and $35 a month in pet rent per pet. What kind of pet do you have? Tomorrow evening isn't open for a tour, but I can show you the home Friday, October 30 between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect | checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Both quote the same rent, special, lease and pet facts, but Email 2 explicitly confirms availability, names the property, and reads like a warm agent, while its only slip is omitting one of the three tour windows. / order B picked 1: Both are accurate and cover rent, special, lease promotion, pets and tour times, but Email 1 states the home is open, names the property, and reads like a natural greeting, while Email 2 only implies availability and opens awkwardly. Drops: the Friday, October 30 10:00 AM–12:00 PM tour window
Inquiry: <user_message> Good morning me and .y my husband would like more information about 2841 Morningside Ct.. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Good morning, Barbara, 2841 Morningside Court is a 4 bedroom, 2.5 bath single family home in Orchard Mesa, about 1,518 square feet, listed at $2,300 a month. It has a 2 car garage, recent upgrades throughout, and a fenced in backyard, and both cats and dogs are welcome there. You and your husband are all set to tour it this Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM. Let me know if there's anything specific about the home you'd like to go over before then. | Hi Barbara, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court. It's available now: a 4-bedroom, 2-bath home with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. It's a single-family home in Orchard Mesa. Leases run 12 months, and you'd pay electricity and internet. Cats and dogs are welcome. The pet deposit is $300 total, refundable, and pet rent is $35 per pet each month. The security deposit is one month's rent, and it won't be more than two months' rent. You're already set to tour the home on Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM. A leasing agent will meet you there, and your husband is welcome to come along. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Both correctly confirm the existing Monday tour, but Email 2 states availability and gives the sourced pricing details a couple asking for more information needs, while Email 1 never says the home is open. / order B picked 1: Email 1 states availability and the lease, utility, pet and deposit facts the couple needs, while Email 2 is warmer but omits availability and all cost details. Drops: 2-car garage; fenced-in backyard; recent upgrades throughout
Inquiry: <user_message> I found 486-32 1/8 32 1 8 Rd on Homes.com and would like to learn more about it. Thanks! I would like to request a tour. Requested Date & Time: September 22 at 04:00 PM. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Reabecca, You're all set, your tour of 486 32 1/8 Road is confirmed for Tuesday, September 22 at 4:00 PM, in person at the property. Looking forward to seeing you then! | Hi Reabecca, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road. That home is no longer available. About your tour on Tuesday, September 22 at 4:00 PM, I'll check with the team and get back to you. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: no_team_told; tools: forward_to_property_manager, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 gives the one fact she needs most — the home is gone — and handles the conflicting booked tour sensibly, while Email 1 sends her to tour a home that isn't available. / order B picked 1: Email 1 gives the one fact the person most needs (the home is gone) and handles the tour honestly with the sanctioned deferral line, while Email 2 cheerfully confirms a tour of an unavailable home and says nothing about it.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Mary Ann, Ember Estates doesn't have a 2 bedroom open right now, but there is a 3 bedroom home open now at 374 Ember Lane for $2,550 a month, and it comes with the Grand Opening Special: 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd handle water, electricity and internet), running through November 15 or while supplies last. I'd love to show it to you. I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM, would either of those work? | Hi Mary Ann, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. It's available now as a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,228 sq ft, from $2,300/mo. There isn't a 2-bedroom open at Ember Estates right now. The 3-bedroom listed at $2,550 a month has a Grand Opening Special: 2 months free rent, plus sewer and trash included for your first term. The resident pays water, electricity and internet, and the special runs until November 15 or while supplies last. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Both are factually sound and offer the same tour days, but Email 2 supplies the size, bath count and rent facts the person asked for while Email 1 leaves out the home's size entirely. / order B picked 1: Both correctly say no 2-bedroom is open, pitch the 3-bedroom with the sourced special and offer the same tour windows, but Email 1 keeps the size and bath facts the person needs while Email 2, though warmer and tighter, drops them.
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Cylus, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes. It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath home with 1,450 square feet at $2,395 a month. I'd love to get you in for a look: I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Cylus, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes at 624 Eisenhauer Street. A 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft is available now from $2,395/mo. You're all set for your tour on Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM, and a leasing agent will meet you at the home. Looking forward to it! |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 confirms the tour already on file while Email 1 contradicts the records by treating Cylus as someone still needing a slot. / order B picked 1: Email 1 correctly confirms the existing tour while Email 2 contradicts the tour record by offering fresh slots.
Can Clara move to a new model on today's prompt with nothing else changed? Each arm is judged against production's own reply on the same turn, in the same window, and held to production against itself.
| Arm | Bar | Lines that failed |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-5 (production run 2) | PASS | no line failed |
| claude-opus-5-5 | PASS | no line failed |
Review set: 12 examples, phones and emails masked, names kept. Grade in chat: "#U4 today" (production better), "#U7 new" (the new model better), "tie", "wrong" (both wrong). Ledger: artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-30-upgrade-pinned-oct30-r3.json.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I would love to schedule time to view this property. Additionally, if my partner and I like it potentially apply as well. Thank you for your time and consideration. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Amy, Thanks for reaching out! 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available, so that one's not an option to view. You and your partner already came by 2841 Morningside Court for a tour, though, how did you both like it? If it felt like the right fit, the application for that one actually already went out to your email on September 29, so take a look there (check your spam folder too in case it landed there) and you can get started whenever you're ready. | Hi Amy, 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available, so I won't be able to get you in to view that one. You and your partner already toured 2841 Morningside Court this past Tuesday though, what did you both think of it? If you'd like to move forward and apply there, I already sent over the application on September 29, so be sure to check your email (including the spam folder) for it. |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails make the same mistake of treating tomorrow's confirmed Morningside tour as already done instead of telling Amy she is all set for it, but Email 2 compounds it with an explicitly wrong 'this past Tuesday', so Email 1 is the less damaging one to send. / order B picked 2: Both emails say the same things and share the flaw of treating tomorrow's confirmed tour as already done, but Email 1 adds an explicit wrong time reference while Email 2 is only slightly wordier.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'm interested in a studio apartment (unit 206/606) at Camellia Apartments and am looking to move in around October 14. Do you offer 6-month lease options? I'd also like to know what additional monthly fees are charged besides the base rent, such as utilities, parking, trash, or other community fees. Thank you!. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 1. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Queen, Unit 206 is a studio, 1 bath, 386 sq ft, at $1,000/mo, available now, which lines up well with your October 14 move in. On lease length: yes, we offer both 6 month and 12 month lease terms at Camellia, and they're at the same rental rate either way. As for monthly costs beyond rent, utilities aren't included in the base rent. Water, sewer, trash, and heat are billed monthly through a third party, Conservice, to your resident portal (that first bill usually shows up about a month after move in). Electric is your own account with Xcel Energy, and internet is set up on your own as well. There's no admin fee. Parking is available for $80/mo surface or $95/mo garage, though on site parking is full right now, so new residents go on a waitlist. In the meantime, the nail salon next door rents spots to Camellia residents for $100/mo, which our office can help set up. Looking forward to seeing you Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM for your tour at 1235 Grant Street. Let me know if anything comes up before then. | Hi Queen, Thanks for your interest in the studio at Camellia Apartments! To answer your questions: yes, we offer 6-month lease terms here, and they're at the same rental rate as a 12-month lease, so there's no price difference either way. On monthly costs beyond rent: utilities aren't included in rent. Water, sewer, trash, and heat are billed monthly through our third-party biller, Conservice (studio residents typically see around $40 to $50 a month, depending on usage). Electric is your own account with Xcel Energy, and internet is also set up individually, so those aren't on your rent statement. Parking is $80/month for a surface spot or $95/month for a garage spot (on-site parking is currently full, so new residents go on a waitlist, though there's an overflow option next door at $100/month arranged through our office). Since you don't have a pet, there are no pet-related fees to worry about. The security deposit for a studio is $300, and the application fee is $38 per applicant with no separate admin fee. You're all set for your tour this Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM, where I can walk you through 206 and answer anything else in person. Looking forward to it! |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 delivers the core home facts (open, rent, size) plus a correct fee rundown and tour confirmation, while Email 2 answers the fee question more fully but never tells her the home's rent or availability; both miss the special. / order B picked 2: Both answer the lease-length and fee questions correctly and confirm the booked tour, but only Email 2 gives the rent and home details, while Email 1 leaves out the core $1,000/mo figure. Drops: unit 206 rent $1,000/mo; 386 sq ft; available now / the home is open
Inquiry: <user_message> I'm interested in this property Zumper Listing: https://www.zumper.com/listings/24011074p/3-bedroom-foresight-park-grand-junction-co. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Mallary, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available, but we do have another 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath home open now with 1,450 square feet at $2,495 a month. It comes with a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and get your first month's rent half off. I'd love to get you in to see it. I have tours available Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Would either of those work for you? | Hi Mallary, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available, but we do have a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath home open now with 1,450 sq ft, starting from $2,395 a month. I can get you in for a tour on Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails wrongly offer tour slots to someone who already has a booked tour, but Email 1 correctly reports the live special beside its rent while Email 2 omits it, so Email 1 gives the person more of what they need. / order B picked 2: Both emails wrongly treat Mallary as needing a tour despite her confirmed October 3 booking, but Email 2 also gives the sourced $2,495 home with its half-month-free special beside the rent, which Email 1 omits. Drops: the move-in special: first month's rent half off with a 12-month lease signed by October 31, 2026
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi James, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes, there's a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath home open now at 1,450 sq ft for $2,495 a month, and it comes with a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and get half off your first month's rent. You're all set for your tour this Saturday, October 3 at 2:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, we're looking forward to seeing you then. | Hi James, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes, it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath home with 1,450 sq ft at $2,495/month, and right now there's a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and get half a month's rent free. I'd love to get you in to see it. I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives the home, rent and special and confirms the tour already on file, while Email 2 wrongly treats James as unbooked and offers slots weeks later. / order B picked 2: Both give the same home, rent and special, but Email 1 offers tour times that tell James his existing booking doesn't exist, while Email 2 correctly confirms his Saturday, October 3 tour. Drops: James already has a confirmed tour Saturday, October 3 at 2:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Riley, Pomona Park Townhomes has a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath townhome open now, 1,450 sq ft, at $2,495/mo, and it comes with a move-in special: get one half month of rent free when you sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026. I'd love to show it to you, I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM, whichever works better for you. | Hi Riley, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes at 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now as a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft, from $2,395/mo. The 3-bedroom listed at $2,495/mo also has a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and your first month's rent is half off. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 pitches one home cleanly with its rent, special, and tour windows, while Email 2 adds the lower rent and address but muddles it by implying two separate 3-bedrooms. / order B picked 2: Both are accurate and offer the same tour windows, but Email 2 names a single home with its special in one clean paragraph, while Email 1 walks through two listings, which the records say not to do.
Inquiry: <user_message> I'm interested in your property and would like to move forward. Can you send me an application for this property? Message in Zillow Rental Manager: https://www.zillow.com/rental-manager/inbox/4fr53kdcs2q85?byProperty=true. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 12. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Keyvis, Thanks for reaching out about 2863 Florida Street, it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,435 sq ft at $2,775/mo. The application for this home already went out to you on Sunday, October 18, so take a look at your email, spam folder included, and you'll find it there. You'd also asked about 2841 Morningside Court, a 4-bedroom that's open now as well. I'd love to get you in to see 2863 Florida Street: I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Keyvis, Thanks for reaching out about 2863 Florida Street. It's available now: a 3-bedroom, 2-bath home with 1,435 sq ft at $2,775/mo. We sent the application for it to your email today, Sunday, October 18, so please check your inbox and your spam folder. The application for 2841 Morningside Court also went out today. We offer 12-month leases. If you'd like to see the home in person, I can show you around on Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or on Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly report the home as open with its details and that the application already went out on October 18 with the same tour windows, but Email 1 names the other home with its open status as the rules ask and closes with a warm, direct question that invites a booking, while Email 2 adds a couple of useful facts but reads flatter. / order B picked 2: Both correctly report the application already went out and offer the same tour windows, but Email 2 reads like a warm agent and invites a reply while Email 1 is stiffer and tacks on filler. Drops: 2841 Morningside Court is a 4-bedroom that is open now
Inquiry: <user_message> I am interested in touring 2980 Emerald Cir.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Kyle, The home at 2980 Emerald Circle is open now too, a 4-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,477 sq ft at $2,300/mo. For tours, I have Friday, October 30, between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM or between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31, between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. What time works for you? | Hi Kyle, Thanks for reaching out about 2980 Emerald Circle. It's available now: a 4-bedroom, 2.5-bath home with 1,477 sq ft at $2,300/mo. You can see it Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same home facts and are correct and warm, but Email 1 offers all three open tour windows while Email 2 silently drops the Friday afternoon one. / order B picked 2: Both are short, correct and name one home, but Email 2 gives every open tour window while Email 1 drops the Friday afternoon slots. Drops: Friday, October 30 tour window between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM
Inquiry: <user_message> Good morning me and .y my husband would like more information about 2841 Morningside Ct.. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Good morning, Barbara, Happy to share more about 2841 Morningside Court. It's a 4 bedroom, 2 bath single family home in Orchard Mesa with 1,518 square feet, available now at $2,300 a month. It has a 2 car garage, recent upgrades throughout, and a fenced in backyard, and both cats and dogs are welcome there. You and your husband are all set for your tour this Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM. Let me know if there's anything specific you'd like to know before then. | Hi Barbara, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court, it’s available now, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. You and your husband are already booked to tour the home on Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM. A leasing agent will meet you both there at 2841 Morningside Court. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly confirm the existing Monday tour, but Email 1 actually answers the 'more information' ask with the garage, backyard, upgrades and pet facts and invites follow-up questions, while Email 2 adds only the meet-at-home note. / order B picked 2: Email 2 actually answers the request for more information with the home's sourced features and pet policy while confirming the existing tour warmly, whereas Email 1 is thin and curt. Drops: 2-car garage; recent upgrades; fenced-in backyard; cats and dogs welcome; single family home in Orchard Mesa
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Jesus, Good to hear from you! Camellia Apartments has a studio open now, 1 bath, 386 sq ft, starting at $950/mo. We're also running a move-in special right now: one month free on 12-month new leases. I'd love to get you in to see it. I have a tour slot on Friday, October 30 between 10:15 AM and 1:45 PM, or on Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM. Either of those work for you? | Hi Jesus, Glad you're interested. Camellia Apartments has a studio open now. It's a 1-bath with 386 sq ft at $950/mo, and it comes with one month free on a 12-month new lease. I need to correct my last note: the price I gave there was wrong, and the special has no other conditions beyond what I just said. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 10:15 AM and 1:45 PM, or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, check_availability | checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, check_availability |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same home, rent, special and tour windows, but Email 1 is clean and natural while Email 2 adds a confusing self-correction that isn't supported by the records. / order B picked 2: Both emails give the same home, rent, special and tour windows, but Email 2 delivers them warmly and cleanly while Email 1 adds a clumsy, unneeded correction line that undermines confidence.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I would love to schedule time to view this property. Additionally, if my partner and I like it potentially apply as well. Thank you for your time and consideration. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Amy, Thanks for reaching out! 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available, so that one's not an option to view. You and your partner already came by 2841 Morningside Court for a tour, though, how did you both like it? If it felt like the right fit, the application for that one actually already went out to your email on September 29, so take a look there (check your spam folder too in case it landed there) and you can get started whenever you're ready. | Hi Amy, The home at 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available. There are two other homes open that are close to what you're after. 2980 Emerald Circle is right next door, a 4-bedroom, 2.5-bath at $2,300/mo. 2841 Morningside Court is a 4-bedroom, 2-bath, also at $2,300/mo. You already have tours booked at both. You'll see 2841 Morningside Court tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29 at 5:30 PM, and 2980 Emerald Circle on Friday, October 2 at 1:30 PM. A leasing agent will meet you at each home. If you and your partner like one of them, you'll each fill out an application, and the fee is $40 per applicant. Once you know which home you want, just tell me and I'll send the application for it. |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: forward_to_property_manager, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 correctly confirms her booked tours and gives rents and the application fee, while Email 1 contradicts the tour state by treating tomorrow's tour as past and drops the rents and the other open home. / order B picked 1: Email 1 says 2978 is gone, confirms her real booked tours with rents and the fee, while Email 2 invents a past tour, gives no rent or tour info and leaves her viewing request unanswered. Drops: the 2841 Morningside Court application already went out (check email/spam)
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'm interested in a studio apartment (unit 206/606) at Camellia Apartments and am looking to move in around October 14. Do you offer 6-month lease options? I'd also like to know what additional monthly fees are charged besides the base rent, such as utilities, parking, trash, or other community fees. Thank you!. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 1. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Queen, Unit 206 is a studio, 1 bath, 386 sq ft, at $1,000/mo, available now, which lines up well with your October 14 move in. On lease length: yes, we offer both 6 month and 12 month lease terms at Camellia, and they're at the same rental rate either way. As for monthly costs beyond rent, utilities aren't included in the base rent. Water, sewer, trash, and heat are billed monthly through a third party, Conservice, to your resident portal (that first bill usually shows up about a month after move in). Electric is your own account with Xcel Energy, and internet is set up on your own as well. There's no admin fee. Parking is available for $80/mo surface or $95/mo garage, though on site parking is full right now, so new residents go on a waitlist. In the meantime, the nail salon next door rents spots to Camellia residents for $100/mo, which our office can help set up. Looking forward to seeing you Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM for your tour at 1235 Grant Street. Let me know if anything comes up before then. | Hi Queen, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 206 at 1235 Grant Street. It's available now: a studio with 1 bath and 386 sq ft at $1,000/mo, and we're running 1 month free on 12-month new leases. We offer both 6-month and 12-month leases at the same rent. Utilities aren't included in rent. Water, sewer, trash and heat are billed monthly through Conservice to your resident portal and paid along with your rent. The amount depends on how much you use, and studio residents have paid around $40 to $50 a month. Electric is your own account with Xcel Energy, and internet is your own as well. Parking is $80/mo for a surface spot or $95/mo in the garage. On-site parking is full right now, so new residents go on a waitlist. Until a spot opens, the nail salon next door rents spots to Camellia residents for $100/mo, and the leasing office sets that up. There's no admin fee. Your tour is set for Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM at 1235 Grant Street. Looking forward to meeting you! |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Both answer the lease and fee questions and confirm the booked tour correctly, but Email 2 also surfaces the live move-in special and the typical utility cost, which Email 1 omits. / order B picked 1: Both answer the lease and fee questions accurately and confirm the existing tour, but Email 1 also surfaces the live move-in special and the utility cost ballpark she asked about, while Email 2 omits the special entirely. Drops: the first Conservice bill shows up about a month after move-in
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Cylus, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes at 624 Eisenhauer Street, it's a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath townhome open now at 1,450 sq ft for $2,495/mo, and there's a move-in special right now: get half a month of rent free when you sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026. I'd love to get you in to see it. I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM, would either work for you? | Hi Cylus, Thanks for reaching out about 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now as a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft, from $2,395/mo. Your tour is set for Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, and a leasing agent will meet you at the home. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 correctly confirms the tour already on file while Email 1 ignores it and offers slots, a bigger error than Email 2 omitting the special. / order B picked 1: Email 1 correctly confirms the booked tour and gives accurate home facts (though it skips the special), while Email 2 contradicts the tour record by offering fresh slots, effectively telling the person their booking doesn't exist. Drops: Move-in special: half a month of rent free with a 12-month lease signed by October 31, 2026
Can Clara move to a new model on today's prompt with nothing else changed? Each arm is judged against production's own reply on the same turn, in the same window, and held to production against itself.
| Arm | Bar | Lines that failed |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-5 (production run 2) | PASS | no line failed |
| claude-opus-5-5 | PASS | no line failed |
Review set: 12 examples, phones and emails masked, names kept. Grade in chat: "#U4 today" (production better), "#U7 new" (the new model better), "tie", "wrong" (both wrong). Ledger: artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-30-upgrade-post-23764.json.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Mary Ann, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. We don't have a 2-bedroom open right now, but there's a 3-bedroom, 2-bath home open now, 1,228 sq ft, from $2,300 a month. I'd love to get you in for a tour: I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Mary, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates. We don't currently have a 2 bedroom open, but a 3 bedroom, 2 bath home at 1,228 sq ft is available from $2,300 a month. I have tours open Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Would either of those work for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails give the same availability, home facts and tour windows, but Email 1 addresses her by her correct name and adds the street address, while Email 2 clips her name to "Mary". / order B picked 2: Both emails give the same facts and tour windows; Email 2 edges ahead by using her actual name, Mary Ann, instead of shortening it.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I would love to schedule time to view this property. Additionally, if my partner and I like it potentially apply as well. Thank you for your time and consideration. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Amy, Just to let you know, 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available. The home at 2841 Morningside Court is still open though, and you already have that tour on the books for tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29th at 5:30 PM, so your partner is more than welcome to come along too. Once you've both had a chance to see it, if you'd like to apply, the application for 2841 Morningside Court was already sent your way (Tuesday, September 29) — just check your email, spam folder included, and let me know if it hasn't turned up. | Hi Amy, Good to hear from you! Just a heads up, 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available, so I'll point you toward 2841 Morningside Court instead, a 4 bedroom home at $2,300/mo that's open now. Good news is you're already all set there, your tour is confirmed for tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29th, at 5:30 PM. If you and your partner love it after seeing it, you're both welcome to apply together, just let me know once you've decided and I'll get you set up with the application. Looking forward to seeing you both tomorrow! |
| checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 correctly reports the application already went out and keeps the confirmed tour, while Email 2 misstates the application as still to come; Email 1's only flaw is omitting the rent. / order B picked 2: Email 2 correctly reports the already-sent application while Email 1 contradicts the record by promising to send it after the tour; Email 2's omitted rent is a lesser flaw since that home's details were given earlier. Drops: the application for 2841 Morningside Court was already sent (check email, spam included)
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'm interested in a studio apartment (unit 206/606) at Camellia Apartments and am looking to move in around October 14. Do you offer 6-month lease options? I'd also like to know what additional monthly fees are charged besides the base rent, such as utilities, parking, trash, or other community fees. Thank you!. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 1. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Queen, Unit 206 is a studio, 1 bath with 386 sq ft, available now at $1,000/mo. We offer both 6-month and 12-month leases at the same rate, and if you go with a 12-month lease you'll get one month free. Utilities aren't included in rent: water, sewer, trash, and heat run through a billing company called Conservice and show up on your portal alongside rent (studio residents have typically paid around $40 to $50 a month there), while electric and internet are your own accounts with Xcel Energy and the internet provider of your choice. On site parking runs $80/mo for a surface spot or $95/mo for a garage spot, though it's full right now and new residents go on a waitlist; in the meantime, overflow parking is available next door at the nail salon for $100/mo. There's no admin fee. I have Friday, October 30 between 10:15 AM and 1:45 PM, or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM, would either of those work for a tour? | Hi Queen, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 206 at Camellia Apartments. It's a studio, 1 bath with 386 square feet, available now at $1,000 per month. We do offer 6 month leases here, at the same rate as our 12 month leases, so that works for your timeline. Rent doesn't include utilities: water, sewer, trash and heat come through a monthly Conservice bill, while electric and internet are set up in your own name with Xcel and your internet provider. Parking runs $80 a month for a surface spot or $95 for a garage spot (on-site parking is on a waitlist right now, but overflow parking is available next door for $100 a month). If a 12 month lease ever makes more sense for you, we're also running one month free on new 12 month leases. Would Friday, October 30 between 10:15 AM and 1:45 PM, or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM work for a tour? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both ignore the already-booked tour, but Email 1 answers the fee question more completely with the utility ballpark and no-admin-fee detail, while Email 2 is only slightly more readable. / order B picked 2: Both correctly cover Unit 206, the 6-month lease, utilities, parking and the special while wrongly ignoring the booked tour, but Email 2 answers the fees question more fully with the no-admin-fee note and the sourced utility ballpark. Drops: Studio residents typically pay around $40–50/mo for the Conservice utilities; There is no admin fee (addresses the 'other community fees' question)
Inquiry: <user_message> Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Michael, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments, it's available now, a studio, 1 bath with 386 sq ft at $950 a month, and right now a 12 month lease comes with one month free. Want to come see it? I have Friday, October 30 between 10:15 AM and 1:45 PM, or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM. | Hi Michael, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments, we have a studio, 1 bath with 386 sq ft open now from $950/mo, plus one month free on a new 12 month lease, and I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 10:15 AM and 1:45 PM or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM, whichever works best for you. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same correct facts and tour times, but Email 1's two-sentence structure with a direct tour invitation reads more naturally than Email 2's single run-on. / order B picked 2: Both give the same correct facts (studio, 386 sq ft, $950, one month free on 12-month lease, same tour windows), but Email 2 breaks it into a natural two-beat message with a clear tour invitation while Email 1 crams everything into a single run-on sentence.
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Riley, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes. We have a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath townhome open now, 1,450 square feet, at $2,495 a month, and it comes with a move in special: sign a 12 month lease by October 31, 2026, and your first month's rent is half off. I have tour times Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Riley, Thanks for reaching out about 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft from $2,395/mo. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both name one home with real rent and tour slots, but Email 1 correctly pairs the $2,495 home with its listed special, which the records say to give beside the rent, while Email 2 skips the special altogether. / order B picked 2: Both are warm, short and offer the same tour windows, but Email 2 includes the live move-in special beside the rent as the records direct, while Email 1 drops it altogether. Drops: the move-in special (half off first month's rent with a 12-month lease signed by October 31, 2026)
Inquiry: <user_message> I am interested in touring 2980 Emerald Cir.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Kyle, 2980 Emerald Circle is open now too, a 4-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,477 sq ft at $2,300/mo. I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or between 1:30 and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. You'd also asked about 2841 Morningside Court, which is open as well if you'd like to see that one too. Which day and time work for you? | Hi Kyle, Thanks for reaching out about 2980 Emerald Circle. It's available now: a 4-bedroom, 2.5-bath home with 1,477 sq ft at $2,300/mo. I can show it to you Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both are accurate and warm, but Email 1 offers every open tour window while Email 2 drops a whole afternoon of slots, which outweighs Email 1's brief, status-correct mention of the other home Kyle had asked about. / order B picked 2: Both are accurate and natural, but Email 2 gives every open tour window while Email 1 drops a whole Friday afternoon block; Email 2's one-line nod to Morningside is a minor overshare since Kyle asked about both homes. Drops: Friday, October 30 afternoon tour window between 1:30 and 5:30 PM
Inquiry: <user_message> Good morning me and .y my husband would like more information about 2841 Morningside Ct.. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Barbara, Happy to share more about 2841 Morningside Court for you and your husband. It's a 4 bedroom, 2 bath single family home in Orchard Mesa with 1,518 square feet, listed at $2,300 a month and available now. It has recent upgrades throughout, a 2 car garage, and a fenced in backyard, and both cats and dogs are welcome. You're all set for your tour this Monday, September 28th at 11:00 AM at the home, so he's more than welcome to join you there. Let me know if any other questions come up before then. | Hi Barbara, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court, it's available now, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. The lease is 12 months, and you'd pay electricity and internet yourselves. The standard security deposit is one month's rent and never more than two months' rent. You and your husband are all set for your tour on Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM. A leasing agent will meet you at the home, 2841 Morningside Court. Looking forward to showing you both around. |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both are correct and confirm the existing tour without re-offering slots, but Email 1 answers a general 'more information' ask more fully with the home's actual features, while Email 2 covers only lease terms. / order B picked 2: Both are accurate and confirm the existing tour, but Email 2 describes the actual home more vividly and in a warmer voice that includes the husband, while Email 1's lease/utility/deposit facts are useful but less central to a general 'more information' ask. Drops: single-family home in Orchard Mesa; 2-car garage; fenced-in backyard; recent upgrades throughout; cats and dogs welcome
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Jesus, A studio at Camellia Apartments, 1 bath with 386 sq ft, is open now from $950/mo, and it comes with one month free on a new 12-month lease. I'd love to get you in to see it. I have Friday, October 30 between 10:15 AM and 1:45 PM, or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM, whichever works better for you? | Hi Jesus, We have a studio open now at Camellia Apartments, 1235 Grant Street. It's a 1-bath with 386 sq ft at $950/mo. I need to correct my last email: the special is one month free on 12-month new leases, and it doesn't come with any of the other conditions I listed there. I can show you around on Friday, October 30 between 10:15 AM and 1:45 PM, or on Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same studio, rent, size, special and tour windows, but Email 1 presents them cleanly while Email 2 wedges in an awkward correction about unspecified prior conditions that muddies the message. / order B picked 2: Both give the same studio facts, special and tour windows, but Email 2 states them cleanly and warmly while Email 1 wraps the special in a confusing apology about unverifiable earlier conditions.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I would love to schedule time to view this property. Additionally, if my partner and I like it potentially apply as well. Thank you for your time and consideration. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Amy, Just to let you know, 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available. The home at 2841 Morningside Court is still open though, and you already have that tour on the books for tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29th at 5:30 PM, so your partner is more than welcome to come along too. Once you've both had a chance to see it, if you'd like to apply, the application for 2841 Morningside Court was already sent your way (Tuesday, September 29) — just check your email, spam folder included, and let me know if it hasn't turned up. | Hi Amy, The home at 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available, so your tour there on Friday, October 2 at 1:00 PM can't happen as planned. You still have tours booked at two homes that are available. Tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29 at 5:30 PM, you're seeing 2841 Morningside Court, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath home at $2,300/mo. On Friday, October 2 at 1:30 PM, you're seeing 2980 Emerald Circle, a 4-bedroom, 2.5-bath home, also at $2,300/mo. If you and your partner like one of them, you'll each fill out an application. The fee is $40 per applicant. Would you like me to cancel the 1:00 PM tour at 2978 Emerald Circle? |
| checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 handles the real consequence of the home being gone (her Friday tour there), keeps her other booked tours with rents and the $40 fee, while Email 1 is warmer and shorter but drops those facts and leaves a dead booking standing. / order B picked 1: Email 1 gives Amy the fuller, all-sourced picture — rents, both remaining tours, the dead 2978 slot and the fee — while Email 2 is warmer but omits the rent and the Friday tours she actually has booked. Drops: The application for 2841 Morningside Court was already sent to her (check email, spam included)
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in NOW PRE-LEASING | 1.5 Months FREE | Brand-New Duplex Homes | Private Garages & Yards | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, There's no one bedroom open at Ember Estates right now, but we do have 3 bedroom homes open starting from $2,300/mo, and a couple of them come with 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd cover electricity, water and internet). We're pet friendly for your dog and cat as well. Want to come take a look? I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM or between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works best for you? | Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. It's available now as a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,228 sq ft at $2,300/mo. There's no 1-bedroom open at Ember Estates right now. These are all brand-new 3-bedroom duplex homes. Another 3-bedroom there is $2,550 a month. Its listing carries a Grand Opening Special: 2 months of free rent, with sewer and trash included for your first term. The resident pays for water, electricity and internet, and the special runs until Nov 15 or while supplies last. Your dog and cat are both welcome. The refundable pet deposit is $300 total, and pet rent is $35 per pet each month. I can show you around on Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or on Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability | checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 gives the home's size, states the special beside its own rent with its end date, and covers her pets with sourced fees, while Email 1 is warmer but leaves the special vague and incomplete. / order B picked 1: Email 1 gives the concrete facts Emma needs (size, the $2,550 home's special with its terms and deadline, pet deposit and rent) while Email 2 is warmer but vague, hinting at a count and dropping most specifics. Drops: Friday, October 30 afternoon tour window 1:30 PM–5:30 PM
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Mary Ann, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. We don't have a 2-bedroom open right now, but there's a 3-bedroom, 2-bath home open now, 1,228 sq ft, from $2,300 a month. I'd love to get you in for a tour: I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Mary, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. It has a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,228 sq ft available now, from $2,300/mo. There's no 2-bedroom open at Ember Estates right now. The 3-bedroom at $2,550 a month has a Grand Opening Special: 2 months free rent, plus sewer and trash included for your first term. The resident is responsible for water, electricity and internet, and the special runs until Nov 15 or until supplies last. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 gives the special the person asked about and all the same core facts, while its name slip and extra price point are smaller flaws than Email 1 omitting the promotion. / order B picked 1: Both correctly say no 2-bedroom is open and offer the same tour times, but only Email 1 gives the special she inquired about, which outweighs Email 2's slightly warmer wording and correct name.
Inquiry: <user_message> I'm interested in this property Zumper Listing: https://www.zumper.com/listings/24011074p/3-bedroom-foresight-park-grand-junction-co. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Mallary, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available, but there's a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath home open now at 1,450 square feet, starting at $2,395/mo. Would you like to see it? I have Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM, whichever works better for you. | Hi Mallary, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available, but we have a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft open now from $2,395/mo. The one at $2,495/mo has a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and your first month's rent is half off. Your tour is booked for Saturday, October 3 at 11:00 AM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, and a leasing agent will meet you at the home. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 confirms the existing tour and includes the sourced special, while Email 1 ignores the booked tour, offers new slots, and drops the special. / order B picked 1: Email 1 gives the special and confirms the existing October 3 tour, while Email 2 drops the special and wrongly offers fresh tour times despite the confirmed booking.
Can Clara move to a new model on today's prompt with nothing else changed? Each arm is judged against production's own reply on the same turn, in the same window, and held to production against itself.
| Arm | Bar | Lines that failed |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-5 (production run 2) | FAIL | reproduce: reference held 15, invented 0, dash 4; run 2 held 12, invented 0, dash 0; baseline v1 24 / 10 / 5 (allowed gap 11) |
| claude-opus-5-5 | PASS | no line failed |
| claude-opus-5-5-cut | PASS | no line failed |
Review set: 20 examples, phones and emails masked, names kept. Grade in chat: "#U4 today" (production better), "#U7 new" (the new model better), "tie", "wrong" (both wrong). Ledger: artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-30-upgrade-first-email-cut.json.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about 565 Redcliff Cir unit 585-201.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Tiffani, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 585-201 at Northridge Apartments (565 Redcliff Cir). It's available now, a 1 bedroom, 1 bath at $1,750 per month. You're all set for your self-guided tour this Saturday, October 17 at 10:00 AM. Just let me know when you're ready to head in that day and I'll send over the lockbox code. | Hi Tiffani, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 585-201 at Northridge Apartments (565 Redcliff Cir), it's available now, a 1-bedroom, 1-bath at $1,750/mo. Tours here are self-guided, so you can go in on your own any day, any time that works for you, day or night. What day and time would you like to see it? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives the same home facts and correctly acknowledges the existing Saturday 10 AM tour, while Email 2 ignores the booked tour and asks them to pick a time as if they had none. / order B picked 2: Email 2 gives the home's availability, size and rent and correctly confirms the tour already on file, while Email 1 ignores the booked tour and asks them to pick a time, contradicting the records. Drops: Their confirmed self-guided tour this Saturday, October 17 at 10:00 AM and that the lockbox code comes when they're ready to go in
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'm interested in a studio apartment (unit 206/606) at Camellia Apartments and am looking to move in around October 14. Do you offer 6-month lease options? I'd also like to know what additional monthly fees are charged besides the base rent, such as utilities, parking, trash, or other community fees. Thank you!. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 1. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Queen, Unit 206 is a studio with 1 bath, 386 square feet, at $1,000/mo and it's available now, which lines up well with your October 14 move in. On lease length: yes, Camellia offers both 6 month and 12 month terms at the same rental rate. One thing worth flagging since you're weighing the shorter term: our current move in special, one month free, only applies to new 12 month leases. Beyond rent, here's what else factors in monthly. Parking is $80/mo for a surface spot or $95/mo for garage (both are full right now, so new residents go on a waitlist, though the leasing office can also set you up with overflow parking next door at the nail salon for $100/mo). Water, sewer, trash and heat are billed monthly through our utility company, Conservice, and for a studio that typically runs around $40 to $50/mo; electric is your own Xcel Energy account and internet is set up on your own as well, so those aren't included in rent. You're all set for your tour Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM at Camellia Apartments, 1235 Grant Street. Looking forward to meeting you then! | Hi Queen, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 206, it's available now, a studio, 1 bath with 386 sq ft at $1,000/mo. We offer both 6-month and 12-month leases at the same rate, so a 6-month term works fine for your October 14th move-in. Beyond rent, water, sewer, trash and heat run through Conservice and studios have typically run around $40 to $50 a month, electric is your own account with Xcel Energy, and internet is set up in your own name as well. Parking is $80/mo for a surface spot or $95/mo for a garage spot, though on-site parking is currently full, so new residents go on a waitlist, with overflow parking available next door for $100/mo in the meantime. We're also running one month free on new 12-month leases, if that's something you'd want to weigh against the 6-month term. I have Friday, October 30th between 2:15 and 4:45 PM, or Monday, November 2nd between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM for a tour, would either work for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both answer the 6-month lease and monthly-fee questions correctly with the special, but Email 2 contradicts the tour record by offering fresh slots while Email 1 confirms the booked tour and reads more cleanly. / order B picked 2: Both answer the lease-length and fee questions correctly, but Email 2 confirms the existing October 13 tour while Email 1 wrongly offers fresh slots, implying the booking doesn't exist. Drops: Their confirmed tour on Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM at 1235 Grant Street
Inquiry: <user_message> I am interested in 2858 C 1/2 Rd.. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Alec, At 2858 C 1/2 Road we have a few 3 bedroom, 2 bath homes to choose from. Unit 361 Ember Ln is 1,428 sq ft at $2,795/mo, and it comes with our Grand Opening Special: receive 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd be responsible for electricity, water and internet), running through November 15 or while supplies last. Unit 2862B Florida Street is 1,323 sq ft at $2,650/mo. There's also one open now at 1,289 sq ft from $2,550/mo, which carries that same Grand Opening Special: 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd cover water, electricity and internet), also through November 15 or while supplies last. I'd love to get you in to see one in person. I have Friday, October 30 between 2:00 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Alec, At 2858 C 1/2 Road there are two homes available right now. 361 Ember Ln is a 3 bedroom, 2 bath home with 1,428 sq ft at $2,795 a month, and it comes with our Grand Opening Special: receive 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd be responsible for electricity, water and internet), good until November 15 or while supplies last. 2862B Florida Street is also a 3 bedroom, 2 bath home, 1,323 sq ft at $2,650 a month. I have tour times on Friday, October 30 between 2:00 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both overshare with a unit roster, but Email 1 keeps every home and special on file including the open-now $2,550 home, while Email 2 states a count and omits that home. / order B picked 2: Both emails roster units, but Email 2 keeps every fact including the open $2,550 home and its special, while Email 1 gives an explicit, incomplete count and drops that home. Drops: The open-now 3-bed/2-bath, 1,289 sq ft home from $2,550/mo; The Grand Opening Special (2 months free plus sewer and trash) on that $2,550 home
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi James, Thanks for your interest in Pomona Park Townhomes. We have a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath townhome open now at 624 Eisenhauer Street (Unit 405), 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo, and it comes with a move in special: sign a 12 month lease by October 31, 2026, and your first month's rent is half off. I also see you're already set for a tour this Saturday, October 3, 2026 at 2:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, looking forward to seeing you then! | Hi James, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes at 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now, a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath home with 1,450 sq ft at $2,495/mo, and it comes with a move in special: get half a month's rent free when you sign a 12 month lease by October 31, 2026. I have tour times open Friday, October 30 between 2:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM, whichever works best for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives the correct sourced rent, size and special and honors the confirmed tour, while Email 2 mismatches size and rent and offers new tour times that tell James his booking does not exist; Email 1's unit number is a lesser fault. / order B picked 2: Email 2 quotes the right size/rent/special pairing and correctly acknowledges the tour already on file, while Email 1 mixes up two homes' facts and offers tour slots that tell James his booking doesn't exist; Email 2's only slip is naming a unit number. Drops: that James already has a confirmed tour Saturday, October 3, 2026 at 2:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street
Inquiry: <user_message> I found 486-32 1/8 32 1 8 Rd on Homes.com and would like to learn more about it. Thanks! I would like to request a tour. Requested Date & Time: September 22 at 04:00 PM. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Reabecca, The home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available. You do have a tour booked for Tuesday, September 22 at 4:00 PM for it, but since the home is no longer available, I can cancel that for you if you would like. Just let me know and I will take care of it. | Hi Reabecca, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road, but the home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available. You have a tour there on Tuesday, September 22 at 4:00 PM. Since the home is no longer available, I can cancel that tour for you. Would you like me to? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both say the same things (home gone, tour on file, offer to cancel), but Email 1 reads a bit more naturally without the redundant address repetition. / order B picked 2: Both say the same things (home gone, tour on file, offer to cancel), but Email 2 reads more naturally without the doubled address.
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Tristan, Thanks for reaching out about 1235 Grant Street, a studio, 1 bath with 386 sq ft, open now at $950/mo, and we're currently running one month free on new 12-month leases. I have Friday, October 30 between 2:15 PM and 4:45 PM, or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM for a tour, which works better for you? | Hi Tristan, Thanks for reaching out about 1235 Grant Street. It has a studio, 1-bath with 386 sq ft available now at $950/mo, and new 12-month leases come with 1 month free. I can show you around Friday between 2:15 PM and 4:45 PM, or Monday between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same home facts and special, but Email 1 states the actual tour dates while Email 2's dateless weekdays would be read as the wrong week. / order B picked 2: Both give the same home facts and special, but Email 2 states the actual tour dates while Email 1's undated 'Friday'/'Monday' points the prospect at the wrong week. Drops: the tour dates (October 30 and November 2) — bare 'Friday' and 'Monday' read as this week from an October 21 send
Inquiry: <user_message> Good morning me and .y my husband would like more information about 2841 Morningside Ct.. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Barbara, Happy to share more about 2841 Morningside Court. It's available now, a 4 bedroom, 2 bath single family home in Orchard Mesa with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. It comes with a 2 car garage, recent upgrades, and a fenced in backyard, and it's great for pets, both cats and dogs are welcome. You and your husband are all set for your tour Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM at the home. Let me know if you have any other questions before then. | Hi Barbara, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court. It's available now: a 4-bedroom, 2-bath home with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. You and your husband are set for your tour at the home on Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM. We look forward to seeing you both. |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly confirm the existing tour, but Email 1 actually answers the request for more information with sourced details (garage, backyard, upgrades, pets) while Email 2 is thin. / order B picked 2: Both correctly confirm the existing Monday tour without re-offering slots, but Email 2 actually answers the 'more information' request with sourced details (garage, upgrades, fenced yard, pets) while Email 1 stays minimal. Drops: single-family home in Orchard Mesa; 2-car garage; recent upgrades; fenced-in backyard; cats and dogs welcome
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Jesus, Great to hear you're interested in Camellia Apartments! Right now we've got a studio, 1-bath with 386 sq ft, available from $950/mo, and we're also running a move-in special of one month free on 12-month new leases. I'd love to get you in for a tour — I have Friday, October 30 between 2:15 PM and 4:45 PM, or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Jesus, Unit 106 at Camellia Apartments is available now: it's a studio with 1 bath and 386 sq ft at $950/mo, and it comes with one month free on a 12-month new lease. I need to correct my last note. The rents and sizes I gave you there weren't accurate, and the special doesn't carry the extra conditions I mentioned. The details above are the right ones. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 2:15 PM and 4:45 PM, or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: get_available_units, check_availability | checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same rent, size, special and tour windows, but Email 1 names the home by size as required and reads like a warm agent, while Email 2 breaks the no-unit-number rule and adds an awkward, possibly wrong retraction. / order B picked 2: Email 2 gives the same open studio, rent, special and tour windows by size as the records instruct, warmly and briefly, while Email 1 names Unit 106 and awkwardly retracts a prior message.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Natalee, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane! We have a 3 bedroom, 2 bath duplex home open now at 1,289 square feet, starting at $2,550 a month, with private garage and yard. There's a Grand Opening Special on it too: receive 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd just be responsible for water, electricity and internet), good until November 15 or while supplies last. I'd love to get you in to see it. I have tour times Friday, October 30 between 2:00 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Natalee, Thanks for asking about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. A 3-bedroom, 2-bath home with 1,289 sq ft is open now at $2,550 a month. Its Grand Opening Special gives you 2 months of free rent, and sewer and trash are included for your first term. You'd pay for water, electricity and internet, and the special runs until November 15 or while supplies last. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 2:00 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which one works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same correct rent, size, special terms and tour windows, but email 1 ties the home back to the duplex-with-garage-and-yard listing Natalee inquired about and reads a touch warmer. / order B picked 2: Both give the same correct rent, size, special and tour slots, but Email 2 confirms the duplex/garage/yard she asked about and reads a touch warmer, while Email 1 is only slightly tighter.
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Cylus, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes at 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5 bath with 1,450 sq ft at $2,495/mo. There's also a move in special right now: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and get half a month's rent free. I have Friday, October 30th between 2:30 and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31st between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM, whichever works better for you? | Hi Cylus, Thanks for reaching out about 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft at $2,395/mo. You're all set for your tour this Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM, and we look forward to seeing you then. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 correctly confirms the tour already on file, while Email 1 ignores that booking and offers fresh slots, which is a factual error that would confuse the prospect about their appointment. / order B picked 1: Email 1 correctly confirms the existing booked tour while Email 2 offers fresh tour times that tell Cylus his confirmed tour doesn't exist, a bigger error than Email 1 skipping the special. Drops: the half-month-free move-in special on the $2,495 3-bedroom (12-month lease signed by October 31, 2026)
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi James, Thanks for your interest in Pomona Park Townhomes. We have a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath townhome open now at 624 Eisenhauer Street (Unit 405), 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo, and it comes with a move in special: sign a 12 month lease by October 31, 2026, and your first month's rent is half off. I also see you're already set for a tour this Saturday, October 3, 2026 at 2:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, looking forward to seeing you then! | Hi James, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes. A 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft is available now at $2,395/mo. You're all set for your tour this Saturday, October 3 at 2:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, and I'm looking forward to showing you around. |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Both confirm the booked Saturday tour and quote sourced rent and size, but Email 1 lists a unit number against the rules while Email 2 names the home by size exactly as the records direct. / order B picked 2: Both correctly confirm the existing Saturday tour and name one home, but Email 2 gives the live special with its terms while Email 1 omits it, and Email 2's single unit number is a smaller fault than missing the special. Drops: the move-in special (half a month free with a 12-month lease signed by October 31, 2026) on the open 3-bedroom at $2,495/mo
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Riley, Thanks for your interest in Pomona Park Townhomes, it's open now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath townhome with 1,450 sq ft at $2,395/mo, and if you sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, you get a half month of rent free. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 2:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM, whichever works better for you? | Hi Riley, Thanks for reaching out about 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now: a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft at $2,395/mo. I can show it to you on Friday, October 30 between 2:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or on Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 is accurate and clean while Email 1 misattributes the special to the wrong-priced home, a pricing error that outweighs Email 2's omission of the special. / order B picked 1: Email 1 is accurate and cleanly written while Email 2 misapplies the special to the wrong rent and runs everything into one comma-spliced sentence, so the correct email wins despite omitting the special. Drops: the move-in special (half month of rent free with a 12-month lease signed by October 31, 2026), which the records carry on the $2,495 3-bedroom
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5-cut |
|---|---|
| Hi Jesus, Great to hear you're interested in Camellia Apartments! Right now we've got a studio, 1-bath with 386 sq ft, available from $950/mo, and we're also running a move-in special of one month free on 12-month new leases. I'd love to get you in for a tour — I have Friday, October 30 between 2:15 PM and 4:45 PM, or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Jesus, Camellia Apartments has a studio open now. It's a 1-bath with 386 sq ft at $950/mo, and it comes with one month free on a 12-month new lease. I need to correct my last email: please disregard the "select apartments" and "restrictions may apply" wording there. The special is one month free on 12-month new leases. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 2:15 PM and 4:45 PM, or Monday, November 2 between 9:00 AM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: get_available_units, check_availability | checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same studio, rent, special and tour windows, but Email 1 does it warmly and cleanly while Email 2 inserts an awkward mid-email retraction of unverifiable prior wording. / order B picked 2: Both give the same home, rent, size, special and tour windows, but Email 2 does it warmly and cleanly while Email 1 adds a confusing, unsupported correction of a prior email.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5-cut |
|---|---|
| Hi Natalee, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane! We have a 3 bedroom, 2 bath duplex home open now at 1,289 square feet, starting at $2,550 a month, with private garage and yard. There's a Grand Opening Special on it too: receive 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd just be responsible for water, electricity and internet), good until November 15 or while supplies last. I'd love to get you in to see it. I have tour times Friday, October 30 between 2:00 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Natalee, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. It's available now: a 3-bedroom, 2-bath home with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo. Its listing has a Grand Opening Special of 2 months free rent, plus sewer and trash included for your first term. The resident covers water, electricity and internet, and the special runs until November 15 or until supplies last. You can come see it on Friday, October 30 between 2:00 PM and 5:30 PM, or on Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same correct facts, special and tour windows, but Email 1 sounds warmer and ties back to the duplex, garage and yard the person asked about. / order B picked 2: Both give the same accurate facts and tour times, but Email 2 confirms the duplex, garage and yard the person asked about and sounds warmer, while Email 1 is a touch terse.
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5-cut (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Cylus, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes at 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5 bath with 1,450 sq ft at $2,495/mo. There's also a move in special right now: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and get half a month's rent free. I have Friday, October 30th between 2:30 and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31st between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM, whichever works better for you? | Hi Cylus, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes at 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now: a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft, from $2,395/mo. You're all set for your tour there on Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM, and I look forward to showing you around. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 correctly confirms the existing October 20 tour while Email 1 contradicts the tour record by offering fresh slots; Email 2's only gap is omitting the special, a smaller fault than denying a booked tour. / order B picked 1: Email 1 correctly confirms the existing tour while Email 2 contradicts the tour state by offering fresh slots, a worse error than Email 1's omitted special. Drops: the move-in special: half a month's rent free with a 12-month lease signed by October 31, 2026 (on the $2,495 3-bedroom listing)
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5-cut |
|---|---|
| Thanks for letting me know, and for narrowing it down to 363 Ember Ln. That home is open now: a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo, and it comes with the Grand Opening Special, 2 months free rent plus sewer and trash included for your first term (you'd just cover water, electricity, and internet) — that special runs through November 15 or while supplies last. On the pet, we welcome pets here: the refundable pet deposit is $300 and pet rent runs $35/month per pet, with a two-pet limit. And good news on the lease length, this home is currently offering longer terms of 14 to 18 months as a promotion, so an 18-month lease works. Tomorrow evening isn't an option, but I do have tour openings Friday, October 30 between 2:30 and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Would either of those work, and what time in that window suits you? Also, could I get your full name to lock in the tour? | Hi Michael, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 363 Ember Ln at Ember Estates (374 Ember Lane). It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo. Its listing also has a Grand Opening Special: 2 months free rent, plus sewer and trash included for your first term. You'd be responsible for water, electricity and internet, and the special runs until Nov 15 or while supplies last. We're currently offering longer leases of 14 to 18 months as a promotion. Cats and dogs are welcome, with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 a month in pet rent per pet. What kind of pet do you have? Tomorrow evening isn't open, but I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 2:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: check_availability | checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Both give the same home facts, special, pet terms, lease promotion and tour slots, but Email 1 ignores the name on file and asks for it, while Email 2 greets Michael by name and is tighter. / order B picked 1: Both give the same home, rent, special, pet fees, lease promo and correct tour windows, but Email 2 re-asks for a name already provided and skips greeting him by name, while Email 1 reads like a warm agent who knows who he is. Drops: two-pet limit (minor, not needed)
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5-cut |
|---|---|
| Hi Riley, Thanks for your interest in Pomona Park Townhomes, it's open now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath townhome with 1,450 sq ft at $2,395/mo, and if you sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, you get a half month of rent free. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 2:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM, whichever works better for you? | Hi Riley, Thanks for reaching out about 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath townhome with 1,450 sq ft at $2,395/mo. I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 2:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 is accurate and reads cleanly, while Email 1 pairs the special with the wrong rent, which the records explicitly forbid, so a correct email that omits the special beats one that misstates it. / order B picked 1: Email 1 is accurate, clean and readable, while Email 2 misattributes the special to the wrong-priced home and crams everything into one run-on sentence. Drops: the half-month-free move-in special (sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026) that is on the $2,495 3-bedroom listing
Inquiry: <user_message> Carmen matched with and expressed interest in Pomona Park Townhomes | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (27 days away!) | BEDS: Studio | BUDGET: $900 | PETS: Renter has no pets | AMENITIES: On-Site Laundry. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5-cut |
|---|---|
| Hi Carmen, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available. We don't have a studio open there right now either, but there is a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath townhome with 1,450 sq ft available now from $2,395/month, and it comes with an in-unit washer and dryer. Would you like to come see it? I have Friday, October 30 between 2:00 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM, either one works for a tour. | Hi Carmen, Thanks for reaching out about Pomona Park Townhomes. Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available. There's no studio open there right now, but there is a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath townhome with 1,450 sq ft, starting at $2,395/mo. One of the 3-bedrooms is $2,495 a month and has a move-in special: if you sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, your first month's rent is half off. If you'd like to see it, I can show you around Friday, October 30 between 2:00 PM and 5:30 PM, or Saturday, October 31 between 10:00 AM and 2:30 PM. Which day works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Both correctly handle Unit 300 and the missing studio, but Email 2 includes the required move-in special while Email 1 omits it, outweighing Email 1's nice laundry mention. / order B picked 1: Both correctly state Unit 300 is gone, no studio is open, the 3-bedroom from $2,395 and the tour windows, but Email 1 includes the required move-in special while Email 2 omits it, outweighing Email 2's nice washer/dryer mention. Drops: The open 3-bedroom has an in-unit washer and dryer (addresses Carmen's stated laundry interest)
Inquiry: <user_message> Good morning me and .y my husband would like more information about 2841 Morningside Ct.. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5-cut (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Barbara, Happy to share more about 2841 Morningside Court. It's available now, a 4 bedroom, 2 bath single family home in Orchard Mesa with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. It comes with a 2 car garage, recent upgrades, and a fenced in backyard, and it's great for pets, both cats and dogs are welcome. You and your husband are all set for your tour Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM at the home. Let me know if you have any other questions before then. | Hi Barbara, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court. It's available now, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. Cats and dogs are welcome, the lease is 12 months, and residents pay electricity and internet. You and your husband are all set for your tour of the home on Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM at 2841 Morningside Court, Grand Junction. Looking forward to showing you both around. |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked tie: Both correctly state availability, size, rent, pets and the existing tour without re-offering slots; they simply add different, equally valid extra facts (home features vs. lease terms and utilities). / order B picked 2: Both are correct, confirm the existing Monday tour and name one home, but Email 2 describes the actual home more warmly and usefully for a general information request, while Email 1 trades that for drier lease terms. Drops: single-family home in Orchard Mesa; 2-car garage; recent upgrades; fenced-in backyard
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I would love to schedule time to view this property. Additionally, if my partner and I like it potentially apply as well. Thank you for your time and consideration. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5-cut (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Amy, The home at 2978 Emerald Circle isn't available right now, so a viewing there isn't possible at the moment. You'd also been looking at 2841 Morningside Court, which is open now, a 4-bedroom home at $2,300/mo, and you already had your tour there on Tuesday, September 29th, so I'd love to hear what you and your partner thought of it. As for applying, you and your partner would each submit your own application, with a $40 application fee per applicant. Let me know how the Morningside Court visit went and whether you'd like to move forward! | Hi Amy, Thanks for writing. The home at 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available, which means your Friday, October 2 tour there at 1:00 PM can't go ahead. Would you like me to cancel it for you? You already have tours booked at two open homes. Tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29 at 5:30 PM, you'll see 2841 Morningside Court, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath for $2,300/mo. On Friday, October 2 at 1:30 PM, you'll see 2980 Emerald Circle, a 4-bedroom, 2.5-bath for $2,300/mo. Please ignore the square footage I gave earlier for Morningside Court. If you and your partner like one of them, you'll each fill out an application. It's $40 per applicant, and you'll each need two forms of ID and proof of income. Once everything is in, you'll hear back within 1 to 2 business days. |
| checks failed: none; tools: | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 matches the tour state (tomorrow's Morningside tour, the 2980 Emerald tour, and the dead 2978 slot) and gives full application facts, while Email 1 wrongly treats a future tour as past and drops her other bookings. / order B picked 1: Email 1 correctly handles the unavailable home, its booked tours and the application details, while Email 2 wrongly treats tomorrow's tour as past and drops the Friday tours and 2980 Emerald Circle.
Can Clara move to a new model on today's prompt with nothing else changed? Each arm is judged against production's own reply on the same turn, in the same window, and held to production against itself.
| Arm | Bar | Lines that failed |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-5 (production run 2) | PASS | no line failed |
| claude-opus-5-5 | FAIL | never_do: no_em_dash 0 new (run 2: 3); no_invented_tour_time 1 new (run 2: 1); invented_facts 0 new (run 2: 1); no_team_told 1 new (run 2: 0); no_empty_reply 0 new (run 2: 1) |
| claude-opus-5-5-goal | FAIL | never_do: no_em_dash 0 new (run 2: 3); no_invented_tour_time 1 new (run 2: 1); invented_facts 0 new (run 2: 1); no_empty_reply 2 new (run 2: 1) |
Review set: 20 examples, phones and emails masked, names kept. Grade in chat: "#U4 today" (production better), "#U7 new" (the new model better), "tie", "wrong" (both wrong). Ledger: artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-29-upgrade-post-23203.json.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I would love to schedule time to view this property. Additionally, if my partner and I like it potentially apply as well. Thank you for your time and consideration. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Amy, 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available, but you're all set to see 2841 Morningside Court tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29th, at 5:30 PM. If you and your partner like it, you're both welcome to apply after the tour. Looking forward to seeing you then! | Hi Amy, Just to let you know, 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available, so there isn't a tour to set up there. You're already all set for 2841 Morningside Court tomorrow, Tuesday the 29th at 5:30 PM — feel free to bring your partner along to that one. If you both like what you see, you're welcome to apply together once you've had a look. |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both say the same things — 2978 is gone, the Morningside tour tomorrow at 5:30 stands, apply if they like it — but Email 1 says it more tightly without the filler. / order B picked 2: Both say the same things — 2978 is gone, the 5:30 PM Tuesday tour at 2841 Morningside Court stands, apply after — but Email 2 is tighter and warmer with no extra claims.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'm interested in a studio apartment (unit 206/606) at Camellia Apartments and am looking to move in around October 14. Do you offer 6-month lease options? I'd also like to know what additional monthly fees are charged besides the base rent, such as utilities, parking, trash, or other community fees. Thank you!. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 1. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Queen, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments. Unit 206 is a studio with 1 bath, 386 sq ft, available now at $1,000/mo. On lease length: we offer both 6-month and 12-month terms at the same rental rate, so a 6-month lease is available on this home. New 12-month leases currently also come with one month free, in case that's worth considering alongside the 6-month option. As for monthly costs beyond rent: parking is $80/mo for a surface spot or $95/mo for a garage spot (on-site parking is full right now, so new residents go on a waitlist, with overflow parking available next door for $100/mo if needed sooner). Water, sewer, trash, and heat are billed monthly through our utility company, Conservice, based on usage, typically running around $40 to $50/mo for a studio, while electric and internet are set up separately in your own name with Xcel Energy and your internet provider. There's no admin fee, and since you mentioned no pets, there's nothing additional on that front. You're all set for your tour Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM at Camellia Apartments, 1235 Grant Street. Looking forward to seeing you then! | Hi Queen, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 206, it's available now, a studio, 1 bath with 386 sq ft at $1,000/mo, which lines up well with your October 14 move-in. Yes, we offer 6 month leases, at the same rate as a 12 month lease. If a 12 month term works better for you, we're also running one month free on new 12 month leases right now. Beyond rent, utilities aren't included: water, sewer, trash and heat run through our billing company, Conservice, and typically land around $40 to $50 a month for a studio, starting about a month after move-in. Electric and internet are your own accounts (Xcel Energy for electric). Parking runs $80/mo for surface or $95/mo for garage, though both are full right now, so new residents go on a waitlist, and in the meantime overflow parking is available next door at $100/mo, arranged through our leasing office. I have Thursday, October 29 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Friday, October 30 between 9:30 AM and 1:45 PM to show you Unit 206, would either window work for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both answer the 6-month and fee questions well, but Email 2 ignores the booked tour and invites them to schedule one, while Email 1 correctly confirms the existing tour. / order B picked 2: Both answer the 6-month lease and fee questions well, but Email 1 ignores the confirmed tour on file and offers fresh slots, while Email 2 correctly confirms her existing tour. Drops: They already have a confirmed tour Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM at 1235 Grant Street; No admin fee
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Cylus, Glad to hear you're interested in Pomona Park Townhomes. You're all set for your tour this Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street. There's a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath home open now at 1,528 square feet for $2,495/mo, and if you sign a 12 month lease by October 31, 2026, you get your first month's rent half off. Looking forward to seeing you Tuesday, and let me know if you have any questions before then. | Hi Cylus, Great to hear from you about Pomona Park Townhomes! You're already all set for a tour this Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street. Right now we have a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath townhome open at 1,450 sq ft, from $2,395/mo, and it comes with a move in special: half a month free rent when you sign a 12 month lease by October 31. Let me know if you have any questions before Tuesday, or if there's anything specific you'd like me to cover when you come by. |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly acknowledge the booked Tuesday tour, but Email 2 pins the move-in special on the wrong home while Email 1 pairs the special with the home that actually offers it. / order B picked 2: Both correctly confirm the existing Tuesday tour and name one home, but Email 2 pairs the special with the home that actually carries it (1,528 sq ft at $2,495, confirmed by its tool result), while Email 1 misattributes the special to the $2,395 home.
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in NOW PRE-LEASING | 1.5 Months FREE | Brand-New Duplex Homes | Private Garages & Yards | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, That duplex listing you just matched with is part of Ember Estates, and it's not available right now. You'd already asked about Pomona Park Townhomes, Unit 405, a 3-bedroom at $2,495/mo, which is still open and pet friendly for your dog and cat. Would Thursday at 5:30 PM, or Friday between 11:30 AM and 12:00 PM or between 2:00 PM and 5:30 PM, still work to come take a look? | Hi Emma, The home at 374 Ember Lane is no longer available. You'd also asked about Pomona Park Townhomes, where Unit 405 (3 bed/2.5 bath, $2,495/mo) is open now and would work for your November 1st move-in. Want to come see it? I have Thursday, October 22 at 5:30 PM, or Friday, October 23 between 11:30 AM and 12:00 PM — which works best for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: no_em_dash, no_invented_tour_time; tools: |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1's tour windows match the tool's open slots and it keeps the pet-friendly fact Emma needs, while Email 2 invents tour dates not in the records. / order B picked 2: Email 2 recognizes the new listing she matched with, explains it is the same unavailable Ember Estates home, keeps the pet-friendly point relevant to her dog and cat, and offers more tour windows, while Email 1 reads like a flat repeat of the prior note. Drops: Pomona Park Unit 405 is pet friendly for her dog and cat
Inquiry: <user_message> I am interested in 2858 C 1/2 Rd.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Alec, 374 Ember Lane is open now, a 3 bedroom, 2 bath home with 1,228 square feet, from $2,300 a month, and right now it comes with our Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks of free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd just cover electricity and internet), running through October 31 or while supplies last. I'd love to get you in to see it. I have Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM, whichever works better for you? | Hi Alec, Thanks for reaching out about 374 Ember Lane. It's available now: a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,228 sq ft at $2,300/mo. I can show you around Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both confirm the home is open with rent, size and the same tour windows, but Email 1 also delivers the live special the person needs while Email 2 omits it, which outweighs Email 1's denser wording. / order B picked 2: Email 2 gives the open home, rent, size, the live special and concrete tour times, while Email 1 drops the special a first-time prospect needs, even though Email 2 attaches it loosely to the $2,300 figure. Drops: Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for the first year (resident covers electricity and internet), through October 31 or while supplies last
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi, 363 Ember Ln is a 3 bed, 2 bath home at 1,289 sq ft for $2,550/mo, and it comes with our Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd just cover electricity and internet), running through October 31 or while supplies last. On the 18 month lease, that actually falls right in the promotional range we're offering right now (14 to 18 months), so that works. As for the pet, cats and dogs are welcome here with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35/month pet rent — what kind of pet do you have so I can make sure it fits? Tomorrow evening isn't open on the calendar, but I do have Thursday, October 29 at 5:00 PM or Friday, October 30 at 5:00 PM for a tour of 363 Ember Ln — would either of those work for you? | I didn't book a tour. Tomorrow evening (Friday, October 9) has no open times, so the email offers the two latest windows on the calendar for 363 Ember Ln: Thursday, October 29 between 2:30 and 5:30 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 1:30 and 5:30 PM. Those are weeks out because they're the earliest times the calendar returned. The email doesn't give a reason. Here's what the email says: - **Opening:** it greets Michael and names 363 Ember Ln: 3 bed, 2 bath, 1,289 sq ft, $2,550/mo. Its Grand Opening Special goes beside the rent: 6 weeks free plus water, sewer and trash for the first year, until October 31 or while supplies last. - **18-month lease:** it says the standard term is 12 months and that 14 to 18 months is currently offered as a promotion. That covers 18 without promising it. - **Pet:** their card only says "Other," so the email doesn't assume it's an ordinary pet. It gives the cat and dog policy (up to two, $300 refundable deposit, $35 a month per pet) and asks what kind of pet it is. If the answer isn't a cat or dog, whether it's allowed isn't on file. Michael's name, the home he wants, the pet note and the 18-month request are now on his record. Two earlier replies in this thread are wrong, and I didn't correct them. The first said 2980 Emerald Circle was no longer available. The current record shows it open, so 2978 was the one that's gone. Those replies also listed 363 Ember Ln at $2,795 instead of $2,550, and 2863 Florida Street as open, though it isn't available until November 2. This email gives the right price for 363 but doesn't call out the earlier mistakes. You may want to send Michael a correction. |
| checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: check_availability, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 is a real, accurate, warm reply with the home's facts, special, lease and pet answers and concrete tour times, while Email 2 is only a meta-commentary note that cannot be sent. / order B picked 2: Email 2 is a real, warm, correct email that names 363 Ember Ln with rent, size and special, answers the 18-month and pet questions, and offers concrete tour times, while Email 1 is a meta-note about an email rather than something sendable. Drops: 363 Ember Ln is a 3 bed/2 bath, 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo with the Grand Opening Special (6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer, trash for the first year, through Oct 31); 18-month lease falls within the 14–18 month promotional range; pet policy: cats and dogs welcome, $300 refundable pet deposit, $35/month pet rent; tomorrow evening is not open; tour offered Thursday Oct 29 at 5:00 PM or Friday Oct 30 at 5:00 PM
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in Beautiful 3br Townhome w 1-car Garage (2024) | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo; there's no 1-bedroom open there right now. It also comes with a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and get half off your first month's rent. Pets are welcome, your dog and cat included: the refundable pet deposit is $300 total, plus $35 per pet per month in pet rent. I'll also mention that Ember Estates isn't available right now. I have Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM for a tour of Unit 405, would either work for you? | Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo; there's no 1-bedroom open there right now. Its listing has a move-in special too: if you sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, your first month's rent is half off. Your dog and cat are both welcome. The pet deposit is $300 total and refundable, and pet rent is $35 per pet per month. I can show you around Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails give the same correct unit, special, pet and tour facts, but Email 1 also closes out her Ember Estates inquiry with its status as the records direct, while Email 2 reads a little more naturally but drops it. / order B picked 2: Both emails give the same home facts, special, pet terms and tour times, but Email 2 also closes the loop on Ember Estates as the records direct, while Email 1 silently drops it. Drops: Ember Estates, which she also inquired about, isn't available right now
Inquiry: <user_message> I found 486-32 1/8 32 1 8 Rd on Homes.com and would like to learn more about it. Thanks! I would like to request a tour. Requested Date & Time: September 22 at 04:00 PM. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Reabecca, 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available right now. You're all set, though, for your tour there on Tuesday, September 22 at 4:00 PM, so there's nothing more to book on that. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. | Hi Reabecca, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road. That home is no longer available. As for your tour on Tuesday, September 22 at 4:00 PM, I'll check with the team and get back to you. I'm happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: none; tools: | checks failed: no_team_told; tools: get_available_units, forward_to_property_manager, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 correctly tells her the home is gone and that her requested tour is already confirmed, while Email 2 needlessly defers a fact on file and promises a follow-up. / order B picked 2: Email 2 states the home is gone and confirms the already-booked tour as the records require, while Email 1 needlessly defers that confirmed tour to the team. Drops: Their Tuesday, September 22 at 4:00 PM tour at 486 32 1/8 Road is already confirmed and they are all set for it
Inquiry: <user_message> Good morning me and .y my husband would like more information about 2841 Morningside Ct.. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Barbara, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court, it's available now, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. It's a single-family home in Orchard Mesa with a 2-car garage, recent upgrades, and a fenced-in backyard, and both cats and dogs are welcome there. You and your husband are all set for your tour on Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM at the home. Looking forward to showing you both around then! | Hi Barbara, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court. It's available now: a 4-bedroom, 2-bath home with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. You and your husband are set for your tour on Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM. A leasing agent will meet you both at the home. |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly confirm the existing tour and the home's status, but Email 1 actually answers the request for more information with sourced home features while Email 2 stays bare-bones. / order B picked 2: Both correctly confirm availability, price, size and the already-booked tour without re-offering slots, but Email 2 actually answers the couple's request for more information with sourced details (garage, upgrades, fenced yard, pets) in a warm, natural voice. Drops: single-family home in Orchard Mesa with a 2-car garage; recent upgrades; fenced-in backyard; cats and dogs welcome
Inquiry: <user_message> I'm interested in your property. inflation these are California prices for lease.. Pet Description: a pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Ronald, The home at 374 Ember Lane is open now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,228 sq ft, from $2,300/mo; right now it also comes with a Grand Opening Special of 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (electricity and internet are on you), through October 31 or while supplies last, and we're also offering longer lease terms of 14 to 18 months as a promotion, so an 18-month lease works fine here. Pets are welcome, with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 per pet per month in pet rent, so just let me know what kind of pet you have and I can confirm the details for you. I'd love to get you in to see it: I have Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM, whichever works better for you. | Hi Ronald, Thanks for reaching out about 374 Ember Lane. It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,228 sq ft from $2,300/mo. Our standard lease is 12 months. Longer leases of 14 to 18 months are also available right now as a promotion. Cats and dogs are welcome here. What kind of pet do you have? I can show you around Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives the special and the pet costs on file while answering the 18-month lease ask, whereas Email 2 reads more naturally but omits those needed facts. / order B picked 2: Email 2 gives the special, pet costs and a direct answer on the 18-month lease that Email 1 omits, even though Email 1 is cleaner and shorter. Drops: Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer, trash included first year, through Oct 31 or while supplies last; Pet deposit $300 refundable and pet rent $35 per pet per month
Inquiry: <user_message> Listing Notes - Phone call. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Vitaliy, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 364 Ember Ln at Ember Estates (374 Ember Lane). It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,795/mo, and it comes with our Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent, plus water, sewer, and trash included for your first year (you'd just cover electricity and internet). That runs through October 31 or while supplies last. I'd love to get you in to see it. I have Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Vitaliy, Thanks for asking about Unit 364 Ember Ln at Ember Estates (374 Ember Lane). It's available now: a 3-bedroom, 2-bath home with 1,289 sq ft at $2,795/mo, so it'll be ready before your October 31 move-in. It also has a Grand Opening Special. You get 6 weeks of free rent, and water, sewer and trash are included for your first year. You'd pay for electricity and internet. The special runs until October 31 or until supplies last. A leasing agent will meet you at the home for the tour. I can show it to you Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM. Which day works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same home, rent, size, special and tour times correctly; email 1 says it a little more smoothly and tightly, while email 2's extras (agent meets you, move-in timing) are fine but not needed. / order B picked 2: Both give the same accurate home, special and tour facts, but Email 2 says it more naturally and compactly with a warmer invitation to tour.
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Good to hear, Patrick! We have a studio open now at $950/mo (386 sq ft, 1 bath), with one month free on a 12-month lease. For your October 22nd move-in, I'd love to get you in to see it. I have tour times Thursday, October 29 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM or 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 9:30 AM and 1:45 PM or 2:15 PM and 4:45 PM — which window works best for you? | Hi Patrick, Camellia Apartments has a studio open now. It's a 1-bath with 386 sq ft at $950/mo, and it comes with one month free on a 12-month new lease. To correct my earlier note: that special has no other conditions attached. I can show you around Thursday, October 29 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Friday, October 30 between 2:15 PM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: check_availability | checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both name one studio at $950 with the one-month-free special, but Email 1 offers every open tour window in a warm, natural voice while Email 2 drops half the windows and inserts a confusing correction line. / order B picked 2: Both quote the same studio, rent and special, but Email 2 is warmer, gives every tour window, and avoids Email 1's odd self-correction line. Drops: Thursday, October 29 afternoon tour window (1:00–4:45 PM); Friday, October 30 morning tour window (9:30 AM–1:45 PM)
Inquiry: <user_message> I am interested in 2858 C 1/2 Rd.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5-goal |
|---|---|
| Hi Alec, 374 Ember Lane is open now, a 3 bedroom, 2 bath home with 1,228 square feet, from $2,300 a month, and right now it comes with our Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks of free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd just cover electricity and internet), running through October 31 or while supplies last. I'd love to get you in to see it. I have Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM, whichever works better for you? | Hi Alec, Thanks for reaching out about 374 Ember Lane. It's available now: a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,228 sq ft at $2,300/mo. I can show you around Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives the person the live special they need (though it attaches it loosely to the from-$2,300 rent), while Email 2 omits it altogether; both name one home and offer the same tour windows. / order B picked 2: Email 2 gives the same availability, size, rent and tour times as Email 1 but also includes the live special with its terms, which Email 1 drops. Drops: Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for the first year, through October 31 or while supplies last
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5-goal (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Cylus, Glad to hear you're interested in Pomona Park Townhomes. You're all set for your tour this Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street. There's a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath home open now at 1,528 square feet for $2,495/mo, and if you sign a 12 month lease by October 31, 2026, you get your first month's rent half off. Looking forward to seeing you Tuesday, and let me know if you have any questions before then. | Hi Cylus, Thanks for reaching out about 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now as a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,450 sq ft, from $2,395/mo. Your tour is set for Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM, and a leasing agent will meet you at the home. |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both confirm the booked tour and name one real open 3-bedroom with sourced rent and size, but Email 1 adds the live special with its terms and closes warmly, while Email 2 skips the special and reads clipped. / order B picked 2: Both correctly treat the booked Tuesday tour as set and name one home, but Email 2 includes the sourced move-in special with its terms and reads warmer, while Email 1 omits the special and ends flat. Drops: the move-in special: half a month of rent free with a 12-month lease signed by October 31, 2026, on the open 3-bedroom at $2,495/mo
Inquiry: <user_message> I would like to schedule a tour.. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 12. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5-goal |
|---|---|
| Hi Megan, The home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available, and I don't have another open home to offer in its place right now. For what it's worth, we do welcome pets here, with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 per pet in monthly pet rent, and our standard lease term is 12 months, which matches what you're looking for. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. | |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: no_empty_reply; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 correctly tells Megan the home is gone, covers the on-file pet and lease policies, and closes warmly, while Email 2 sends no reply. / order B picked 2: Email 1 sent no reply, while Email 2 correctly says the home is gone, answers the pet and lease-length points from the records, and closes warmly as instructed. Drops: home is no longer available; no alternative home to offer; pets welcome with $300 refundable pet deposit and $35/pet monthly pet rent; 12-month standard lease
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in Beautiful 3br Townhome w 1-car Garage (2024) | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5-goal |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo; there's no 1-bedroom open there right now. It also comes with a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and get half off your first month's rent. Pets are welcome, your dog and cat included: the refundable pet deposit is $300 total, plus $35 per pet per month in pet rent. I'll also mention that Ember Estates isn't available right now. I have Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM for a tour of Unit 405, would either work for you? | Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street), it’s available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo; there’s no 1-bedroom open there right now. Unit 405 has a move-in special on its listing: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and your first month's rent is half off. Your dog and cat are both welcome. The pet deposit is $300 total and refundable, and pet rent is $35 a month per pet. I can show you around Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give identical, sourced facts on Unit 405, the special, pets and tour times, but Email 1 also closes the loop on Ember Estates in one short sentence as the records call for, while Email 2 drops it. / order B picked 2: Both emails give the same correct home, special, pet and tour facts, but Email 2 also tells Emma that Ember Estates is unavailable as the records instruct, while Email 1 drops it. Drops: Ember Estates, which Emma also inquired about, is not available right now
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello I’m interested in the house however have a few questions. First is there other pictures of the inside of the house or back yard. Also is there any security deposit or any other fees to rent the property prior to moving in.. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5-goal |
|---|---|
| Hi Nathan, The home at 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available. A few other homes we have open right now: 2841 Morningside Court in Grand Junction (4 bed / 2 bath, $2,300/mo), 2980 Emerald Circle (4 bed / 2.5 bath, $2,300/mo), and 363 Ember Ln (3 bed / 2 bath, $2,550/mo). Each has its own deposit and fee details, which I'm happy to walk you through once you pick one. Which of these would you like to see? | |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: no_empty_reply; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 tells Nathan the home is gone and offers the alternatives the records directed, while Email 2 sent no reply whatsoever. / order B picked 2: Email 1 sent nothing, while Email 2 tells Nathan the home is gone, offers the alternatives the records instructed it to name, and invites next steps, despite not answering his photo and fee questions. Drops: 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available; alternative open homes (2841 Morningside Court, 2980 Emerald Circle, 363 Ember Ln) with beds/baths and rent; invitation to pick a home to tour
Inquiry: <user_message> I found 486-32 1/8 32 1 8 Rd on Homes.com and would like to learn more about it. Thanks! I would like to request a tour. Requested Date & Time: September 22 at 04:00 PM. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5-goal |
|---|---|
| Hi Reabecca, 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available right now. You're all set, though, for your tour there on Tuesday, September 22 at 4:00 PM, so there's nothing more to book on that. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. | Hi Reabecca, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road. That home is no longer available. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: none; tools: | checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, forward_to_property_manager, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly say the home is gone, but only Email 1 answers her tour request by confirming the booking already on file, while Email 2 leaves that ask unanswered. / order B picked 2: Both correctly say the home is gone, but only Email 2 addresses the one thing Reabecca actually asked for — her September 22, 4:00 PM tour — by confirming the booking already on file, while Email 1 silently drops it. Drops: Her tour is already confirmed for Tuesday, September 22 at 4:00 PM at 486 32 1/8 Road
Inquiry: <user_message> I am interested in touring 2980 Emerald Cir.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5-goal |
|---|---|
| Hi Kyle, The home at 2980 Emerald Circle is open now too, a 4-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,477 sq ft at $2,300/mo. For a tour there, I have Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or between 2:30 and 5:30 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM, or between 1:30 and 5:30 PM. What time works best for you? | Hi Kyle, Thanks for reaching out about 2980 Emerald Circle. It's available now: a 4-bedroom, 2.5-bath home with 1,477 sq ft at $2,300/mo. I can show it to you Thursday, October 29 any time between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 any time between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both are correct and warm, but Email 1 gives Kyle nearly all the sourced tour windows while Email 2 narrows his choices to two without reason. / order B picked 2: Both emails give the same correct home facts and sound natural, but Email 2 offers more of the actual open tour windows, giving Kyle more real choices. Drops: Thursday, October 29 afternoon tour window (2:30–5:30 PM); Friday, October 30 morning tour window (10:00 AM–12:30 PM)
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5-goal (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Will, good to hear from you again! Right now we have unit 220 open, a one-bedroom at $1,200/mo, 556 sqft. We're also running one month free on new 12-month leases. I don't have any update yet on a west-facing, floor 3+ unit beyond what's already been flagged with the team. Want to come take a look at 220 in the meantime? I have Monday between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or between 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM, whatever works best for you. | I wrote Will a short first email. Nothing was booked, and nothing went to the team. **What the email says:** - **Unit 614:** no longer available. - **What's open now:** a 1-bedroom, 1-bath, 556 sq ft at $1,200/mo, with 1 month free on a new 12-month lease. I didn't name the unit number. - **Parking:** I answered this because his notes mention it. On-site spots are full and new residents join a waitlist. Until then, the nail salon next door rents spots to residents for $100 a month. - **Tour times:** Thursday, October 29 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Friday, October 30 between 9:30 AM and 1:45 PM. **Things to check:** - **Tour dates:** those dates come from the inquiry card. My calendar check for Monday, October 5 showed openings from 9:00 AM to 11:45 AM and 1:00 PM to 4:45 PM. Both offered dates are after his October 24 move-in, so you may want to offer him Monday instead. - **Earlier wrong promises:** past emails told Will that units 420 and 524 were available when they had been rented. They also said someone would follow up "tomorrow" on the west-facing question, and that 614 was confirmed for a 1 PM tour even though the booking tool refused it. This email doesn't correct any of that, and I have no direction-facing data to answer his question. - **No tour on file now:** the September 30 tour has passed and nobody recorded whether he came. I saved his wants to his record: west-facing, level 3 or higher, and parking. |
| checks failed: none; tools: | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 is a real, warm, sendable email with rent, size, the special and concrete tour times, while Email 2 is a meta-summary that was never written as an email despite the tool telling it to. / order B picked 2: Email 2 is a real, warm, sendable note with the open home, rent, size, special and concrete Monday tour times, while Email 1 never writes the email at all.
Can Clara move to a new model on today's prompt with nothing else changed? Each arm is judged against production's own reply on the same turn, in the same window, and held to production against itself.
| Arm | Bar | Lines that failed |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-5 (production run 2) | FAIL | controls: a control did not go red: rows do not count reproduce: reference held 14, invented 0, dash 2; run 2 held 12, invented 0, dash 2; baseline v1 24 / 10 / 5 (allowed gap 11) |
| claude-opus-5-5 | FAIL | controls: a control did not go red: rows do not count never_do: no_em_dash 0 new (run 2: 2); no_invented_tour_time 1 new (run 2: 0); no_team_told 1 new (run 2: 0); no_empty_reply 1 new (run 2: 0) |
Review set: 12 examples, phones and emails masked, names kept. Grade in chat: "#U4 today" (production better), "#U7 new" (the new model better), "tie", "wrong" (both wrong). Ledger: artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-29-upgrade-post-23482.json.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Mary Ann, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. We don't have a 2 bedroom open at this home right now, but we do have a 3 bedroom, 2 bath open now at 1,289 sq ft for $2,550/mo, and it comes with a special right now: 6 weeks free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd still cover electricity and internet), running through October 31 or while supplies last. Would you like to come see it? I have Thursday, October 29 between 10:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM, whichever works better for you. | Hi Mary, No 2-bedroom is open at Ember Estates right now, but there is a 3-bedroom, 2-bath home open now at 1,289 sq ft for $2,550/mo. It comes with the Grand Opening Special: you get 6 weeks of free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year, with you responsible for electricity and internet, and the special runs through October 31 or while supplies last. I can show you around Thursday, October 29 between 10:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same facts, special and tour times, but Email 2 gets her name wrong in the greeting while Email 1 uses it correctly. / order B picked 2: Both emails give the same sourced facts, special terms and tour windows with one home named; Email 2 edges ahead only by using her full name Mary Ann.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I would love to schedule time to view this property. Additionally, if my partner and I like it potentially apply as well. Thank you for your time and consideration. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Amy, 2978 Emerald Circle isn't available right now, so that one won't be in play for an application. I hope you enjoyed seeing it on your tour. The good news is 2841 Morningside Court is open now, a 4 bed, 2 bath home at $2,300/mo, and you're already all set for your tour there tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29th at 5:30 PM. The application for it was sent to you on September 29th too, so once you and your partner have seen it, you can go ahead and apply, just check your email (and spam folder) for it. | Hi Amy, The home at 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available. You and your partner already toured 2841 Morningside Court on the 29th though, so I'd love to hear what you both thought of it. On applying, the application for 2841 Morningside Court already went out to you on Tuesday, September 29 from AppFolio, so take a look at your email (spam folder too) and your partner is welcome to apply alongside you whenever you're ready. |
| checks failed: none; tools: | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 confirms the real upcoming tour, quotes the rent and home details, and answers the apply question, while Email 2 misstates the tour as past, drops the rent and leaves the viewing request unaddressed. / order B picked 2: Email 2 correctly confirms the upcoming tour with rent and size and answers both the viewing and application asks, while Email 1 wrongly says the tour already happened and drops the rent and tour confirmation. Drops: 2841 Morningside Court is 4 bed / 2 bath at $2,300/mo; Her confirmed tour of 2841 Morningside Court tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29 at 5:30 PM
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Northridge Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Arturo, Thanks for reaching out about Northridge Apartments at 565 Redcliff Cir. It's available now, a 3 bedroom, 2 bath home with 1,100 sq ft at $2,400/mo. Tours here are self-guided: you go in on your own at the time you pick, any day, day or night, and I'll send you the lockbox code. What day and time would work for you? | Hi Arturo, Thanks for reaching out about Northridge Apartments at 565 Redcliff Cir, it's open now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,100 sq ft, from $2,400/mo. It's a self-guided visit: you go in on your own at the time you pick, and I'll send you the lockbox code. What day and time works best for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails give the same home, rent, size and self-guided tour ask, but Email 1 also tells Arturo he can go any day, day or night, which the records say to convey. / order B picked 2: Both emails give the same home facts and self-guided tour explanation, but Email 2 also tells Arturo he can visit any day or time as the records direct and reads a little more cleanly. Drops: tours can be any day, day or night
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in Beautiful 3br Townhome w 1-car Garage (2024) | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo; there's no 1-bedroom open there right now. It also comes with a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and your first month's rent is half off. Since you mentioned having a dog and a cat, the pet deposit is $300 total and pet rent runs $35 per pet per month. You'd also asked about Ember Estates, but that one isn't available right now. I'd love to show you Unit 405: I have Thursday, October 29 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo; there's no 1-bedroom open there right now. Right now it also comes with a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and get one half month of rent free. Cats and dogs are both welcome, with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 per pet per month in pet rent. I can show you Unit 405 Thursday, October 29 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM, would either of those work for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails state the mandated opening, rent, special, pet deposit and pet rent, and the same tour windows correctly, but Email 1 also tells Emma in one short sentence that Ember Estates is unavailable, as the records call for, while Email 2 omits it. / order B picked 2: Both give the same correct rent, size, special, pet costs and tour times, but Email 2 also closes the loop on Ember Estates in one sourced sentence as the records call for. Drops: Ember Estates, the other home she inquired about, is not available right now
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I would love to schedule time to view this property. Additionally, if my partner and I like it potentially apply as well. Thank you for your time and consideration. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Amy, 2978 Emerald Circle isn't available right now, so that one won't be in play for an application. I hope you enjoyed seeing it on your tour. The good news is 2841 Morningside Court is open now, a 4 bed, 2 bath home at $2,300/mo, and you're already all set for your tour there tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29th at 5:30 PM. The application for it was sent to you on September 29th too, so once you and your partner have seen it, you can go ahead and apply, just check your email (and spam folder) for it. | Hi Amy, Thanks for reaching out about 2978 Emerald Circle. That home is no longer available. Two other homes are open, and both are 4-bedrooms at $2,300/mo: 2841 Morningside Court has 2 baths, and 2980 Emerald Circle has 2.5 baths. You already have tours booked at both. You'll see 2841 Morningside Court tomorrow, Tuesday, September 29 at 5:30 PM, and 2980 Emerald Circle on Friday, October 2 at 1:30 PM. A leasing agent will meet you at each home. If you and your partner like one of them, the application fee is $40 per applicant, so $80 for the two of you. Each of you will need two forms of ID and proof of income. Just reply here when you're ready and I'll send the application. |
| checks failed: none; tools: | checks failed: no_invented_tour_time; tools: update_prospect, forward_to_property_manager, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 names one home, confirms the booked tour, and correctly reflects the application already on file, while Email 2 lists a count of homes and contradicts the record by offering to send an application that was already sent. / order B picked 2: Email 2 handles the apply ask the way the records require (application already sent, check email) and names one home without a count, while Email 1 wrongly re-promises the application and lists a roster; Email 2's past-tense tour slip is a smaller error. Drops: the application for 2841 Morningside Court was already sent to her (check email and spam)
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about 565 Redcliff Cir unit 585-201.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Tiffani, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 585-201 at Northridge Apartments (565 Redcliff Cir). It's available now, a 1 bedroom, 1 bath at $1,750/mo. You're all set for your self-guided tour this Saturday, October 17 at 10:00 AM, just text me whenever you're ready to head in and I'll send over the lockbox code. Looking forward to it! | Hi Tiffani, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 585-201 at Northridge Apartments (565 Redcliff Cir). It's available now: a 1-bedroom, 1-bath at $1,750/mo. Your self-guided tour is on Saturday, October 17 at 10:00 AM at 565 Redcliff Cir. Nobody will meet you there. You go in on your own, and when you ask for the lockbox code or tell me you've arrived, I'll get it sent to you. If you'd like to go earlier, just let me know. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same correct facts and confirm the booked self-guided tour, but Email 1 does it in a warmer, tighter voice while Email 2 adds a blunt line and process detail. / order B picked 2: Both give the same correct facts (unit open, 1bd/1ba, $1,750, Saturday 10 AM self-guided tour, lockbox code on request), but Email 2 says it more warmly and in fewer words.
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in Beautiful 3br Townhome w 1-car Garage (2024) | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo; there's no 1-bedroom open there right now. It also comes with a move-in special: sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, and your first month's rent is half off. Since you mentioned having a dog and a cat, the pet deposit is $300 total and pet rent runs $35 per pet per month. You'd also asked about Ember Estates, but that one isn't available right now. I'd love to show you Unit 405: I have Thursday, October 29 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street). It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo. If you sign a 12-month lease by October 31, 2026, you get your first month's rent half off. There's no 1-bedroom open there right now. Your dog and cat are both welcome. The pet deposit is $300 total and refundable, and pet rent is $35 per pet per month. I can show you around Thursday, October 29 between 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails give the same correct home facts, special, pet charges and tour times, but Email 1 also closes the loop on Ember Estates while Email 2 only adds that the pet deposit is refundable. / order B picked 2: Both are accurate and offer real tour times, but Email 2 also closes the loop on Ember Estates as the records direct, while Email 1 only adds the minor 'refundable' detail. Drops: Ember Estates, which Emma also inquired about, is not available right now
Inquiry: <user_message> Good morning me and .y my husband would like more information about 2841 Morningside Ct.. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Barbara, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court, it's available now, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. It's a single-family home in Orchard Mesa with a 2-car garage, recent upgrades throughout, and a fenced backyard, and both cats and dogs are welcome there. You're all set for your tour on Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM, and your husband is more than welcome to join you. Let me know if anything else comes to mind before then. | Hi Barbara, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court. It's available now, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. The lease is 12 months, and residents pay electricity and internet. You already have a tour booked for Monday, September 28 at 11:00 AM. A leasing agent will meet you at the home, and your husband is welcome to come too. We look forward to meeting you both. |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly honor the booked tour and give the headline facts, but Email 1 answers a 'more information about the house' ask with the home's actual features (garage, yard, pets) while Email 2 only adds lease and utility notes. / order B picked 2: Both correctly confirm the existing tour, but Email 2 gives the richer, more relevant picture of the home for a general information request in a warmer voice. Drops: single-family home in Orchard Mesa; 2-car garage; recent upgrades; fenced backyard; cats and dogs welcome
Inquiry: <user_message> I'm interested in your property. inflation these are California prices for lease.. Pet Description: a pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Ronald, Thanks for reaching out about 374 Ember Lane, it's available now, a 3 bedroom, 2 bath home with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo, and right now it comes with a grand opening special: 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd just cover electricity and internet), running through October 31 or while supplies last. On lease length, we're currently offering longer terms of 14 to 18 months as a promotion, so an 18 month lease works here. For pets, cats and dogs are welcome, with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 per pet per month in pet rent. Since your pet is listed as "Other," let me know a bit more about what kind so I can make sure that's all set. Would you like to come see it Thursday, October 29 between 10:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 10:00 AM and 12:30 PM? | Hi Ronald, Thanks for reaching out about 374 Ember Lane. It's available now: a 3-bedroom, 2-bath home with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo. I hear you on the rent, and the Grand Opening Special helps with that. You get 6 weeks of free rent, and water, sewer and trash are included for your first year (you'd pay for electricity and internet). The special runs until Oct 31 or supplies last. Our standard lease is 12 months, and right now we're offering longer leases of 14 to 18 months as a promotion. Cats and dogs are welcome here, up to two pets. What kind of pet do you have? I can show you the home Thursday, October 29 between 10:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both are accurate and offer tours, but Email 1 answers the pet question more fully with the sourced pet deposit and rent and explicitly confirms the 18-month lease, while Email 2's nicer nod to the rent comment doesn't make up for leaving pet costs out. / order B picked 2: Email 2 directly confirms the 18-month lease and quotes the on-file pet deposit and pet rent a pet owner needs, while Email 1 is a bit warmer but leaves those out. Drops: $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 per pet per month pet rent
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Thanks for the details. I don't have anything open tomorrow evening, but for 363 Ember Ln I can offer Thursday, October 29 between 2:30 and 5:30 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 1:30 and 5:30 PM. Would either of those work? On the lease, we're currently running a promotion offering longer terms of 14 to 18 months, so an 18-month lease works for 363 Ember Ln. As for the pet, we do welcome cats and dogs, with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35/month pet rent (every pet gets registered through OurPetPolicy before move-in). Since you listed the type as "Other," can you let me know what kind of pet it is so I can confirm how it fits our policy? And just a reminder, 363 Ember Ln is a 3 bed, 2 bath home at $2,550/month, with a Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd just cover electricity and internet). That special runs through October 31 or while supplies last. | Hi Michael, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 363 Ember Ln at Ember Estates (374 Ember Lane), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo. It also has the Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year, with you covering electricity and internet. The special runs until Oct 31 or until supplies last. Cats and dogs are welcome. There's a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 a month in pet rent per pet. What kind of pet do you have? On the lease, we're offering longer leases of 14 to 18 months right now as a promotion. Tomorrow evening isn't open. I can show you around Thursday, October 29 between 2:30 PM and 5:30 PM, or Friday, October 30 between 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect | checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Both give the same rent, special, pet terms, lease promotion and the same Oct 29/30 tour windows, but Email 2 leads with the home being available now, adds the square footage, and reads more naturally, while Email 1 omits availability and size. / order B picked 1: Email 1 leads with the home, its availability, size, rent and special, answers the tour, pet and lease questions concisely and warmly, while Email 2 is longer, misordered, omits the sq ft and availability, and reads oddly with 'just a reminder'. Drops: pets are registered through OurPetPolicy before move-in
Inquiry: <user_message> I am interested in touring 2980 Emerald Cir.. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Kyle, The home at 2980 Emerald Circle is open now too — a 4-bedroom. For tomorrow, Monday, I have openings between 9:00 and 9:30 AM, between 11:30 AM and 12:00 PM, between 2:00 and 3:30 PM, or at 5:30 PM. Which time works for you? | |
| checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: | checks failed: no_empty_reply; tools: save_prospect, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked both_wrong: Email 2 is a total non-response, but Email 1 invents tour slots that contradict the records and drops the rent and size, so neither is safe to send. / order B picked both_wrong: Email 1 never replies, while Email 2 replies but invents tour times that contradict the records and omits the home's rent and size, so neither is fit to send. Drops: 2980 Emerald Circle is open now; 4-bedroom; tour times
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Will, good to hear from you again! Our 1-bedroom, unit 220, is open now at $1,200/mo, 556 sqft. On the west-facing, floor 3+ requirement, I still don't have an update on that from the team. The office is closed today, but tomorrow (Monday) I have openings between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or between 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM — would any time in there work for a tour of 220, or would you rather wait on the floor 3+ question first? | Hi Will, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments. Unit 614 at Camellia Apartments (1235 Grant Street) is no longer available, but we have a 1-bedroom, 1-bath with 556 sq ft open now at $1,200/mo. It qualifies for our Move-in Special: 1 month free on 12-month new leases. I can show you around Thursday, October 29 between 10:15 AM and 11:45 AM, or Friday, October 30 between 9:30 AM and 1:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 states 614 is gone, gives the open home, the special and the real tour slots, while Email 1 invents a unit number and tour times not on file. / order B picked 1: Email 1 sticks to the sourced facts (614 gone, open 1BR, special, real tour slots) while Email 2 invents tour times and a unit number and drops the special and the 614 update. Drops: Acknowledgment of Will's west-facing, floor 3+ requirement
Can Clara move to a new model on today's prompt with nothing else changed? Each arm is judged against production's own reply on the same turn, in the same window, and held to production against itself.
| Arm | Bar | Lines that failed |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-5 (production run 2) | PASS | no line failed |
| claude-sonnet-5-5 | FAIL | never_do: no_em_dash 0 new (run 2: 3); invented_facts 6 new (run 2: 2); no_team_told 1 new (run 2: 0) quality: production better on 10, this arm better on 15, tie 5 (run 2: production better 7, allowed 9) |
| claude-opus-5-5 | FAIL | never_do: no_em_dash 0 new (run 2: 3); invented_facts 1 new (run 2: 2); no_team_told 1 new (run 2: 0) graded: production better on 2 of 9 graded cards (run 2: 1) |
Review set: 20 examples, phones and emails masked, names kept. Grade in chat: "#U4 today" (production better), "#U7 new" (the new model better), "tie", "wrong" (both wrong). Ledger: artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-28-upgrade.json.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Mary Ann, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. A 2-bedroom isn't open there right now, but there's a 3-bedroom open now, running $2,550 to $2,795 a month. It also comes with the Grand Opening Special: receive 6 weeks free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd cover electricity and internet). That special runs through October 31 or while supplies last. Would a 3-bedroom work for you? I can show it Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM, whichever is better for you. | Hi Mary Ann, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. We don't have a 2-bedroom open there right now, but we do have a 3-bedroom available, running $2,550 or $2,795 a month. It also comes with a special: Grand Opening Special: Receive 6 Weeks FREE Rent + Water, Sewer, Trash Included for Your First Year! (Resident responsible for electricity and internet.) Special until Oct 31 or supplies last! I'd love to show it to you. I have Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM. Would either of those work for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same facts, slots and one home, but Email 1 phrases the special in a warm, natural agent voice while Email 2 reads like pasted listing copy. / order B picked 2: Both give the same facts and the same tour windows, but Email 2 states the special in a natural sentence and checks whether a 3-bedroom works for her, sounding more like a real leasing agent.
Inquiry: <user_message> I found 486-32 1/8 32 1 8 Rd on Homes.com and would like to learn more about it. Thanks!. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Erika, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road. It's no longer available. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. | Hi Erika, The home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly say the home is gone and close warmly without promising follow-up, but Email 1 opens with a thank-you that makes it feel more like a real leasing agent's first reply. / order B picked 2: Both correctly say the home is gone and close warmly, but Email 2 thanks Erika first, which reads like a real leasing agent.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'm interested in a studio apartment (unit 206/606) at Camellia Apartments and am looking to move in around October 14. Do you offer 6-month lease options? I'd also like to know what additional monthly fees are charged besides the base rent, such as utilities, parking, trash, or other community fees. Thank you!. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 1. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Queen, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 206 at Camellia Apartments, it's a studio, 1 bath, 386 sq ft, available now at $1,000/mo. We do offer 6-month leases, at the same rate as our 12-month leases, and 12-month leases currently come with one month free. On fees: utilities aren't included in rent. Water, sewer, trash, and heat run through Conservice (studio residents typically see about $40 to $50 a month there), while electric and internet are your own separate accounts. Parking runs $80/mo for a surface spot or $95/mo for a garage, though on site parking is full right now so new residents go on the waitlist, with overflow parking available next door for $100/mo in the meantime, and there's no admin fee. You're all set for your tour on Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM at Camellia Apartments, looking forward to it! | Hi Queen, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 206 at Camellia Apartments, it's available now, a studio, 1 bath with 386 sq ft at $1,000/mo. We do offer both 6-month and 12-month leases at the same rental rate, and right now new 12-month leases get one month free. Beyond rent, water, sewer, trash and heat are billed monthly through our third-party provider, Conservice, based on usage; studio charges run about $40 to $50 a month. Electric is your own account with Xcel Energy, and internet is also set up in your own name. Parking is $80/mo for a surface spot or $95/mo for a garage spot, though on-site parking is full right now, so new residents go on a waitlist; in the meantime, the nail salon next door rents spots to residents for $100/mo, arranged through our office. I'd love to get you in to see it. I have Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM. Would either work for a tour? |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 answers both questions fully, adds the no-admin-fee point, and correctly confirms the existing tour, while Email 2 contradicts the tour state by inviting them to book a new one. / order B picked 2: Email 2 answers both questions with sourced facts and correctly confirms the existing tour, while Email 1 ignores the booked tour and offers fresh slots, which tells the prospect their booking doesn't exist. Drops: Their confirmed tour on Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM; No admin fee
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in NOW PRE-LEASING | 1.5 Months FREE | Brand-New Duplex Homes | Private Garages & Yards | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, Ember Estates is no longer available. The 3-bedroom at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is still open at $2,495/mo, and it's pet-friendly for your dog and cat. Want to grab one of the tour times I mentioned, Thursday, October 22 at 5:30 PM or Friday, October 23 between 11:30 AM and 12:00 PM? | Hi Emma, That duplex listing is for Ember Estates, and it's not available right now. Let me know if you'd like to look at anything else and I'm happy to help. |
| checks failed: no_invented_tour_time; tools: | checks failed: none; tools: |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 names the unavailable home, redirects to the open 3-bedroom with rent and pet answer, and offers tour times, while Email 2 is a dead end; only Email 1's unsourced tour slots keep it from being clean. / order B picked 2: Email 2 states the unavailability plainly, redirects to the open Pomona Park 3-bedroom with rent and pet answer, and offers tour times, while Email 1 is a dead end. Drops: Pomona Park Townhomes 3-bedroom is open at $2,495/mo; pet-friendly for her dog and cat; concrete tour times offered
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Mary Ann, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. A 2-bedroom isn't open there right now, but there's a 3-bedroom open now, running $2,550 to $2,795 a month. It also comes with the Grand Opening Special: receive 6 weeks free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd cover electricity and internet). That special runs through October 31 or while supplies last. Would a 3-bedroom work for you? I can show it Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM, whichever is better for you. | Hi Mary Ann, Thanks for reaching out about 374 Ember Lane. There's a 3-bedroom available now at $2,550 to $2,795/mo, and no 2-bedroom is open there right now. The listing has a Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year. You'd cover electricity and internet. The special runs until Oct 31 or supplies last. I can show you the 3-bedroom on Wednesday, October 28 between 10:30 AM and 12:30 PM, or Thursday, October 29 between 1:00 PM and 1:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails give the same sourced facts (no 2-bedroom open, 3-bedroom at $2,550–$2,795, the full special terms, valid tour windows), but Email 1 acknowledges her 2-bedroom request first and asks whether a 3-bedroom would work, sounding a touch warmer. / order B picked 2: Both give the same correct facts, special and tour times; Email 2 reads slightly warmer by naming Ember Estates, leading with her 2-bedroom ask, and checking whether the 3-bedroom would suit her.
Inquiry: <user_message> I found 486-32 1/8 32 1 8 Rd on Homes.com and would like to learn more about it. Thanks!. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Erika, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road. It's no longer available. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. | Hi Erika, The home at 486 32 1/8 Road in Clifton is no longer available. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly say the home is gone and close warmly without inventing anything, but Email 1 opens with a thank-you while Email 2 jumps straight to the bad news. / order B picked 2: Both emails correctly say the home is gone and close warmly, but Email 2 thanks Erika first, which makes it read like a real leasing agent rather than a curt notice.
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Cylus! Great to hear you're interested in Pomona Park Townhomes. You're actually all set for your tour there on Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street. Right now we've got a 3-bedroom open, and it's running a move-in special: 1 half month of rent free, at $2,495/month. You'll be able to see it in person on Tuesday. Let me know if you have any questions before then! | Hi Cylus, Thanks for reaching out about 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now, a 3-bedroom at $2,495/mo, and the listing carries a Move-In Special: Get 1 HALF MONTH of Rent FREE! You're all set for your tour on Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM at the home, where a leasing agent will meet you. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both are accurate and confirm the existing tour, but Email 1 reads like a warm agent with a natural close while Email 2 feels flat and copy-pasted, outweighing its small extra arrival detail. / order B picked 2: Both correctly confirm the existing tour and give the 3-bedroom rent and special, but Email 2 sounds warmer and more natural while Email 1 only adds the minor detail that an agent meets them.
Inquiry: <user_message> I would like to schedule a tour.. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 12. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Megan, The home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available. We do run standard 12 month leases, and cats and dogs are welcome here with a refundable $300 pet deposit and $35 a month pet rent per pet. On your pet specifically, I'll check with the team and get back to you. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. | Hi Megan, 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available. Our pet policy welcomes cats and dogs, with a refundable $300 pet deposit and $35 per pet per month in pet rent. A 12-month lease is the standard term. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: no_team_told; tools: update_prospect, forward_to_property_manager, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly say the home is gone and give the same pet and lease facts, but Email 1 also addresses Megan's non-cat/dog pet with a sanctioned team check-in while Email 2 leaves that question hanging. / order B picked 2: Both correctly say the home is gone and give the same pet and lease facts, but Email 2 recognizes that an 'Other' pet isn't covered by the cats-and-dogs policy and routes that to the team, which answers her more fully.
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Thanks for letting me know, 363 Ember Ln is open now, a 3 bed/2 bath at 1,289 sq ft for $2,550/mo, and it's running the Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd cover electricity and internet), through October 31 or while supplies last. An 18 month lease works there too, since that home is currently offering lease terms of 14 to 18 months. On the pet, could you tell me what kind it is? We're pet friendly for cats and dogs (limit two), and I want to make sure I give you the right info. For the tour, I don't have an exact evening slot locked in yet, but I do have Wednesday, October 28 with openings from 1:00 PM up to 5:45 PM, or Thursday, October 29 from 2:30 PM up to 5:45 PM. Would 5:00 PM on either of those work, or is there a specific time you'd prefer? | Hi Michael, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 363 Ember Ln at Ember Estates (374 Ember Lane). It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo, and it carries this special: "*Grand Opening Special – Receive 6 Weeks FREE Rent + Water, Sewer, Trash Included for Your First Year!* (Resident responsible for electricity and internet.) - Special until Oct 31 or supplies last!" An 18-month lease works here, since longer leases of 14 to 18 months are currently offered as a promotion. What kind of pet do you have? Once I know, I can go over the pet details with you. I'd be glad to set up a tour for tomorrow. What time works best for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives real, checked tour times, the pet policy and the special in its own words, while Email 2 promises an unverified tomorrow tour and pastes the special verbatim with asterisks. / order B picked 2: Email 2 answers the tour question with sourced, concrete slots and adds the pet policy, while Email 1 promises an unchecked 'tomorrow' tour with no times. Drops: the actual open tour slots (Wednesday Oct 28 1:00–5:45 PM, Thursday Oct 29 2:30–5:45 PM); pets welcome are cats and dogs, limit two
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in Beautiful 3br Townhome w 1-car Garage (2024) | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo; there's no 1-bedroom open there right now. There's also a move-in special on it right now: get 1 half month of rent free. You'd also asked about Ember Estates, which isn't available right now. Cats and dogs are both welcome, with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 per pet per month in pet rent. I have tours Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM, want to come take a look? | Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo; there's no 1-bedroom open there right now. The listing has a Move-In Special: Get 1 HALF MONTH of Rent FREE! Both your dog and your cat are welcome. The refundable pet deposit is $300 total, and pet rent is $35 per pet per month, so $70 a month for the two. Ember Estates is no longer available. I can show you Unit 405 on Wednesday, October 28 between 1:15 PM and 5:45 PM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: invented_facts; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails give the same facts, special, pet terms and valid tour windows, but Email 1 phrases the special and the tour invite in a more natural leasing-agent voice. / order B picked 2: Both give the same correct facts, special, pet terms and valid tour slots, but Email 2 phrases the special and the Ember Estates note in a natural agent voice while Email 1 pastes shouty listing text.
Inquiry: <user_message> Dear owner Leasing Agent. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Patricia, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments. We have a studio available now, running $950 to $1,000 a month, around 386 to 444 square feet, and new 12-month leases come with one month free right now. I'd love to show you around: I have Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM. Which works better for you? | Hi Patricia, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments at 1235 Grant Street, where a studio is open now. New 12-month leases also come with 1 month free. I can show you around Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: invented_facts; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both are correct, warm and offer valid tour windows, but Email 1 adds the rent and square footage Patricia needs while Email 2 only confirms a studio is open. / order B picked 2: Email 2 gives the sourced rent and square footage Patricia needs along with the special and tour times, while Email 1 omits pricing entirely. Drops: studio rent ($950–$1,000/mo); studio size (386–444 sq ft)
Inquiry: <user_message> 367 Ember Ln, awaiting your reply Western Slope Property Management Message in Zillow Rental Manager: https://www.zillow.com/rental-manager/inbox/u6gfa757ygvs?byProperty=true. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi David, Thanks for reaching out about 367 Ember Lane, it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,317 sq ft at $2,750/mo. I can show you around Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM, whichever works better for you. | Hi David, Thanks for reaching out about 367 Ember Lane, it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,317 sq ft at $2,750/mo. I can show you the home Wednesday between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM or Thursday between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM, which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: The emails are otherwise identical, but only Email 1 states the actual tour dates, while Email 2's bare weekday names imply tomorrow and would mislead David. / order B picked 2: Both emails open correctly and offer the same slots, but only Email 2 gives the dates, which matters because the slots are a week out, not tomorrow. Drops: Tour dates: Wednesday, October 28 and Thursday, October 29 (email 2 says only 'Wednesday' and 'Thursday', which from a Tuesday Oct 20 reads as tomorrow, Oct 21/22)
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Cylus! Great to hear you're interested in Pomona Park Townhomes. You're actually all set for your tour there on Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM at 624 Eisenhauer Street. Right now we've got a 3-bedroom open, and it's running a move-in special: 1 half month of rent free, at $2,495/month. You'll be able to see it in person on Tuesday. Let me know if you have any questions before then! | Hi Cylus, Thanks for reaching out about 624 Eisenhauer Street. It's available now, a 3-bedroom at $2,495/mo, and its listing has a move-in special: get 1 half month of rent free. You're all set for your tour this Tuesday, October 20 at 5:00 PM, and a leasing agent will meet you at the home. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both confirm the existing tour and give the same open 3-bedroom, rent and special correctly, but Email 1 reads like a warm agent with a natural close while Email 2 is clipped despite adding the small arrival detail. / order B picked 2: Both are accurate and confirm the existing tour without re-offering slots, but Email 2 reads warmer and finishes naturally, while Email 1's only extra is the meet-at-the-home detail and it stops mid-thought.
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Thanks for letting me know, 363 Ember Ln is open now, a 3 bed/2 bath at 1,289 sq ft for $2,550/mo, and it's running the Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd cover electricity and internet), through October 31 or while supplies last. An 18 month lease works there too, since that home is currently offering lease terms of 14 to 18 months. On the pet, could you tell me what kind it is? We're pet friendly for cats and dogs (limit two), and I want to make sure I give you the right info. For the tour, I don't have an exact evening slot locked in yet, but I do have Wednesday, October 28 with openings from 1:00 PM up to 5:45 PM, or Thursday, October 29 from 2:30 PM up to 5:45 PM. Would 5:00 PM on either of those work, or is there a specific time you'd prefer? | Hi Michael, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 363 Ember Ln at Ember Estates (374 Ember Lane), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo. Its Grand Opening Special gives you 6 weeks of free rent, and water, sewer and trash are included for your first year (you'd cover electricity and internet). The special runs until Oct 31 or while supplies last. An 18-month lease is available: leases of 14 to 18 months are being offered right now as a promotion. Cats and dogs are welcome with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 a month in pet rent per pet. What kind of pet do you have? I'd be glad to set up a tour for tomorrow evening. What time works for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 answers the tour ask with sourced, concrete slots while Email 2 promises an unchecked evening tour, though Email 2 is warmer and adds the pet fees. / order B picked 2: Email 2 actually answers the tour question with sourced, concrete slots and is honest that no evening slot is open, while Email 1 implies a tomorrow-evening tour it never verified and offers no times; Email 1's warmer greeting and pet-cost details don't outweigh that. Drops: Concrete open tour slots (Wed Oct 28 1:00–5:45 PM, Thu Oct 29 2:30–5:45 PM) from the booking tool
Inquiry: <user_message> Dear owner Leasing Agent. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Patricia, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments. We have a studio available now, running $950 to $1,000 a month, around 386 to 444 square feet, and new 12-month leases come with one month free right now. I'd love to show you around: I have Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM. Which works better for you? | Hi Patricia, Thanks for reaching out about 1235 Grant Street. A studio there is available now, and we're running one month free on new 12-month leases. I can show you around Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: invented_facts; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both are warm, correctly sourced and offer real tour windows with the special, but only Email 1 tells Patricia the studio's rent and size. / order B picked 2: Both are warm, accurate and offer concrete tour times, but Email 2 adds the sourced rent and square footage Patricia needs while staying just as short. Drops: Rent ($950 to $1,000 a month); Size (around 386 to 444 square feet)
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Sara, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments. We have a studio open now, running 386 to 444 sq ft for $950 to $1,000 a month, and right now new 12 month leases get one month free. I'd be glad to set up a tour for you, what day and time would work best? | Hi Sara, Thanks for reaching out about 1235 Grant Street. We have a studio available now, and we're running 1 month free on 12-month new leases. I'd be glad to set up a viewing for you. What day and time work best? |
| checks failed: invented_facts; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives the rent, size and special accurately while Email 2 only confirms a studio exists; neither offers concrete tour times, so Email 1's extra facts decide it. / order B picked 2: Both are warm, accurate and name one home with the special, but Email 2 adds the sourced rent and size Sara needs while Email 1 gives her nothing to judge the home by; neither offers concrete tour times. Drops: Studio rent ($950 to $1,000 a month); Studio size (386 to 444 sq ft)
Inquiry: <user_message> Info Request: Move-in 10/09/2026 I saw your rental listing on Zumper and would like to learn more. Zumper Listing: https://www.zumper.com/apartment-buildings/p1642949/northridge-apartments-ridgway-co. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Steven, Thanks for reaching out about Northridge Apartments at 565 Redcliff Cir, it's available now, a 3-bedroom home. Tours here are self-guided: you can go in on your own any day, any time that works for you, and I'll send you the lockbox code ahead of your visit. What day and time would you like to go see it? | I've written the first reply to Steven's inquiry. It tells him a 3-bedroom is open now at Northridge Apartments (565 Redcliff Cir) and confirms the virtual tour already on file for Sunday, September 27 at 10:00 AM, with the Zoom link. Two things in his record don't add up: - **Tour:** The record shows a virtual tour already booked for Sunday, even though this is his first message and he hasn't asked for one. I treated it as real and confirmed it because the record says it's booked. Someone should check how it got there, or he'll get a confirmation for a tour he doesn't know about. - **Application:** The record says his application was sent on Sunday, September 27. Today is Friday, September 25, so that date hasn't happened yet. He didn't ask about applying, so the email doesn't mention it, but the date is probably wrong. The email has no rent, bath count or square footage because his record doesn't list them for the 3-bedroom, and I didn't look them up. I saved him as a lead with his name, email and the October 9 move-in date. Nothing was handed off to the team. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 is a short, warm, sendable reply that names the open 3-bedroom and explains the self-guided visit, while Email 2 is an internal summary that cannot be sent to the prospect. / order B picked 2: Email 2 is a real, warm, sendable reply naming the home and availability, though it wrongly ignores the booked tour, while Email 1 is an internal summary rather than a message to the prospect.
Inquiry: <user_message> I'm interested in your property and would like to move forward. Can you send me an application for this property? Message in Zillow Rental Manager: https://www.zillow.com/rental-manager/inbox/4fr53kdcs2q85?byProperty=true. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 12. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Keyvis, Thanks for letting us know you'd like to move forward. The application for 2863 Florida Street went out to you earlier today, so take a look in your inbox, and check your spam folder just in case. You'd also asked about 2841 Morningside Court, which is open now too, and that application went out today as well. If you don't see either one, just let me know. | Hi Keyvis, Thanks for reaching out about 2863 Florida Street. It's available now: a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,435 sq ft at $2,775/mo. We sent you the application for it today, Sunday, October 18. It comes from AppFolio, so please check your inbox and your spam folder. We also sent you the application for 2841 Morningside Court today. A 12-month lease is the standard term here. The application fee is $40 per applicant, and a decision takes 1 to 2 business days once everything is in. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Both correctly report the applications already sent, but Email 2 also gives the availability, size and rent the person needs while Email 1 omits them entirely. / order B picked 1: Email 1 confirms the application was sent and gives availability, rent, size and fee facts a person moving forward needs, while Email 2 omits every home fact. Drops: 2841 Morningside Court is open now
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Northridge Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Owen, Thanks for reaching out about Northridge Apartments, we have a 3-bedroom open now. Tours here are self-guided, so you can go any time that works for you, day or night, and I'll send you the lockbox code. What day and time would you like to go? | Hi Owen, Thanks for reaching out about Northridge Apartments at 565 Redcliff Cir. A 3-bedroom is available there now. It's a self-guided visit: you go in on your own at the time you pick, and I'll send you the lockbox code. What day and time would you like to see it? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked tie: Both emails thank Owen, name the 3-bedroom as open, explain the self-guided visit correctly, and ask for a time in the same warm, short voice, differing only in the address versus the 'day or night' phrasing. / order B picked 2: Both are correct and nearly identical, but Email 2 conveys the any-time flexibility the records specify in one natural flowing paragraph, while Email 1 only adds the address. Drops: tours can be any time, day or night
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about Camellia Apartments.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Yoira, Unit 402 at Camellia Apartments (1235 Grant Street) is no longer available. The good news is we do have a studio open right now, running $1,150/mo. Also, just to confirm, we offer both 6 and 12 month leases at the same rental rate, so a 6 month term works fine here. I'd be glad to get a tour set up for you. What day and time work best? | I sent Yoira a reply. Before you rely on it, you should know my June reply to her had two errors. This one fixes them, but she may still have the wrong information. The June errors: - **Wrong application link.** I sent her the floor-plans page on the Camellia website. This reply gives her the correct link (https://jpco.appfolio.com/listings) and asks her to use it instead. - **Wrong wording on the special.** I said "1 month free on select apartments, restrictions may apply." The actual special is 1 month free on new 12-month leases, with none of those conditions. This reply states it correctly but doesn't point out that the earlier wording was wrong. What the new reply says: - Unit 402 is no longer available, but a studio is open now. - Camellia offers 6-month and 12-month leases at the same rent. Her new inquiry asked for 6 months, so I added that the 1 month free special only applies to 12-month leases. - She already has a tour on Monday, October 26 at 11:00 AM at 1235 Grant Street, so she doesn't need to book another. Her new inquiry asked to schedule a tour, so I didn't book a second one. I left out a rent figure. The only prices I have are from June (studios at $1,150/mo), and the current availability info doesn't include a price. I also added a note to her lead record that she asked about a 6-month lease. Nothing needed to go to the team. |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 is a real, warm, sendable note with only a tour-booking slip and a missing special, while Email 2 is a meta-summary addressed to the operator that could never go to the prospect. / order B picked both_wrong: Email 1 describes a correct reply but is not itself a sendable email, while Email 2 is sendable but wrongly treats her as having no tour and omits the application link and special. Drops: Studio rent of $1,150/mo
Can Clara move to a new model on today's prompt with nothing else changed? Each arm is judged against production's own reply on the same turn, in the same window, and held to production against itself.
| Arm | Bar | Lines that failed |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-5 (production run 2) | PASS | no line failed |
| claude-opus-5-5 | FAIL | never_do: no_invented_tour_time 0 new (run 2: 1); invented_facts 1 new (run 2: 1); no_team_told 1 new (run 2: 0) |
Review set: 15 examples (the 12 the runner picks, losses first, plus the never-do item it skipped and two wins), phones and emails masked, names kept. Grade in chat: "#U4 today" (production better), "#U7 new" (the new model better), "tie", "wrong" (both wrong). Ledger: artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-28-upgrade-postfold.json.
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi there, 363 Ember Ln is open now, a 3 bedroom, 2 bath home at 1,289 sq ft for $2,550/mo, and it's running the Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd just cover electricity and internet), through October 31 or while supplies last. On the pet: cats and dogs are welcome here with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35/month pet rent. Since you listed the type as "Other," could you let me know what kind of pet it is so I can confirm it's covered under that policy? On lease length: this home is currently offering longer terms as a promotion, 14 to 18 months, so an 18 month lease works here. For an evening tour, the latest I can offer is 5:45 PM: that's open Wednesday, October 28 or Thursday, October 29. Which day works better for you? | Tomorrow evening isn't open for a tour, but I can get you in Wednesday, October 28 at 9:00 AM or Thursday, October 29 at 9:30 AM, whichever works better. For 363 Ember Ln, it's a 3-bedroom, 2-bath home at 1,289 sq ft for $2,550/mo, and it's currently running a Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer, and trash included for your first year (you'd just cover electricity and internet), through October 31 or while supplies last. An 18-month lease works too, since we're currently offering promotional terms from 14 to 18 months. On the pet, could you tell me what kind of animal it is? That'll help me give you the right details. |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect | checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 answers the evening-tour request with actual evening slots, states the home is open and gives the sourced pet deposit and pet rent, while Email 2 offers mornings and omits those facts. / order B picked 2: Email 2 states the home is open, gives the sourced pet deposit and rent, confirms the 18-month lease, and offers evening slots that match the ask, while Email 1 answers an evening request with morning times and omits the pet fees. Drops: that 363 Ember Ln is open now; pet deposit $300 refundable and $35/month pet rent; evening tour times (5:45 PM Oct 28 or Oct 29) matching the evening request
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in Beautiful 3br Townhome w 1-car Garage (2024) | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo; there's no 1-bedroom open there right now. It also comes with a move-in special: get one half month of rent free. Cats and dogs are both welcome there, with a refundable pet deposit of $300 total and pet rent of $35 per pet per month, so your dog and cat are covered under the two-pet limit. I can show you around Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo; there's no 1-bedroom open there right now. It's also running a move-in special: get one half month of rent free. Since you mentioned your dog and cat, Pomona Park welcomes cats and dogs, with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 per pet monthly pet rent, so you're all set with two pets. I have Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM to show you the home, whichever works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails give the same sourced facts (availability, rent, special, pet deposit and rent, tour windows); Email 1 reads slightly more naturally with a clean, separate tour-offer question while Email 2's final sentence is clumsy. / order B picked 2: Both emails give the same sourced facts (availability, rent, size, special, pet deposit and rent, tour times); email 2 reads a touch more naturally with a clean, separate tour-time question.
Inquiry: <user_message> Dear owner Leasing Agent. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Patricia, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments at 1235 Grant Street. We have a studio available now, 1 bath, 386 sq ft, at $950/mo, and right now new 12 month leases come with one month free. I can show it to you Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Patricia, Thanks for reaching out to Camellia Apartments! I'd love to help you find the right place here. Are you looking for a particular size apartment, like a studio or one bedroom, and do you have a move in date in mind? |
| checks failed: invented_facts; tools: get_available_units | checks failed: none; tools: |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 names one open studio with rent, size, the live special and concrete tour times, while Email 2 defers everything and just asks the prospect questions. / order B picked 2: Email 2 names the open studio with its sourced rent, size and live special and offers concrete tour times, while Email 1 shares nothing and just asks questions. Drops: a studio is open now; 386 sq ft, 1 bath at $950/mo; one month free on new 12-month leases; concrete tour times Wednesday Oct 28 or Thursday Oct 29
Inquiry: <user_message> Carmen matched with and expressed interest in Pomona Park Townhomes | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (27 days away!) | BEDS: Studio | BUDGET: $900 | PETS: Renter has no pets | AMENITIES: On-Site Laundry. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Carmen, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available. There's no studio open there right now, but a 3-bedroom is open at $2,495/mo, and it comes with this move-in special: get 1 half month of rent free. I can show it to you Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Carmen, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available. There isn't a studio open at this property right now, but there is a 3 bedroom open, starting from $2,395 a month. Would you like to come see it? I have Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM, whichever works better for you. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly say Unit 300 is gone, no studio is open, name the open 3-bedroom and offer the same tour windows, but Email 1 includes the real move-in special while Email 2 drops it. / order B picked 2: Both correctly say Unit 300 is gone, no studio is open, a 3-bedroom is, and offer the same tour windows, but Email 2 includes the sourced move-in special with its rent while Email 1 drops it. Drops: the move-in special on the open 3-bedroom at $2,495/mo: get 1 half month of rent free
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'm interested in a studio apartment (unit 206/606) at Camellia Apartments and am looking to move in around October 14. Do you offer 6-month lease options? I'd also like to know what additional monthly fees are charged besides the base rent, such as utilities, parking, trash, or other community fees. Thank you!. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 1. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Queen, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 206, a studio at $1,000/month, available now. Camellia Apartments offers both 6-month and 12-month lease terms at the same rental rate, so a 6-month lease works fine for your October 14 move-in. On fees beyond rent: water, sewer, trash, and heat are billed monthly through our third-party biller, Conservice (studio residents typically see about $40 to $50 a month there), while electric and internet are set up separately in your own name with Xcel Energy and your preferred provider. On-site parking runs $80/month for a surface spot or $95/month for a garage spot, though those are currently full with a waitlist; in the meantime, overflow parking is available next door at the nail salon for $100/month, arranged through our office. Since you don't have pets, there's nothing additional there. Looking forward to seeing you Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM for your tour! | I've written Queen's first email from what we have on file. The only thing still open is her "Lease Length Months: 1": nothing on file covers a 1-month lease, so I sent that question to the property team. The email covers: - **The unit:** Unit 206 is a studio with 1 bath, 386 sq ft, at $1,000/mo, and it's available now. It also has the 1 month free special on a 12-month new lease. - **6-month lease:** Yes, we offer one, at the same rent as a 12-month lease. For the 1-month term, the email says "I'll check with the team and get back to you" and doesn't hint at an answer. - **Utilities:** None are included in rent. Water, sewer, trash and heat are billed through Conservice based on usage, and studio residents have paid around $40 to $50 a month. Electric (Xcel Energy) and internet are her own accounts. - **Parking:** Surface spots are $80/mo and garage spots are $95/mo, but on-site parking is full, so she'd go on a waitlist. Until then, the nail salon next door rents spots for $100/mo through the leasing office. - **Admin fee:** There isn't one. - **Tour:** She already has a confirmed tour for Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM at 1235 Grant Street, so the email ends on that instead of offering new times. She also mentioned unit 606. I left it out because her card is for Unit 206 and I haven't looked up whether 606 is available. Her record also says an application was sent on Tuesday, October 13, which is two days from now, so that date looks wrong. She didn't ask about applying, so the email doesn't mention it. |
| checks failed: none; tools: | checks failed: no_team_told; tools: forward_to_property_manager, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 is a warm, sendable reply that answers the 6-month and fees questions and honors the existing tour, while Email 2 is a meta-description of an email rather than one. / order B picked 2: Email 2 is a real, warm, sendable email that answers the lease and fee questions and honors the booked tour, while Email 1 is only a staff-facing description of an email and would be nonsensical to send.
Inquiry: <user_message> I would like to schedule a tour.. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 12. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Megan, The home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available, and I don't have another open home to offer right now. For what it's worth, pets are welcome here, cats and dogs, with a refundable $300 deposit and $35 a month pet rent per pet, and the standard lease term is 12 months, which matches what you're looking for. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. | Hi Megan, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road. That home is no longer available. Our standard lease is 12 months. Where pets are allowed, cats and dogs are welcome, with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 per pet per month in pet rent. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly say the home is gone, give the sourced pet deposit/rent and 12-month lease, and close as required; email 1 is a touch warmer and more direct about pets being welcome here. / order B picked 2: Both correctly say the home is gone and give the same pet and lease facts, but Email 2 states plainly that pets are welcome at this property and ties the 12-month lease back to Megan's ask, reading more like a warm agent.
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi there, 363 Ember Ln is open now, a 3 bedroom, 2 bath home at 1,289 sq ft for $2,550/mo, and it's running the Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd just cover electricity and internet), through October 31 or while supplies last. On the pet: cats and dogs are welcome here with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35/month pet rent. Since you listed the type as "Other," could you let me know what kind of pet it is so I can confirm it's covered under that policy? On lease length: this home is currently offering longer terms as a promotion, 14 to 18 months, so an 18 month lease works here. For an evening tour, the latest I can offer is 5:45 PM: that's open Wednesday, October 28 or Thursday, October 29. Which day works better for you? | Hi Michael, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 363 Ember Ln at Ember Estates (374 Ember Lane), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo. It also has a Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks of free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd cover electricity and internet), until Oct 31 or while supplies last. You can get an 18-month lease on this home, because leases of 14 to 18 months are being offered right now as a promotion. Cats and dogs are welcome. There's a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 a month in pet rent per pet. What kind of pet do you have? I'd be glad to set up a tour for tomorrow evening. What time works for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives the same home facts plus real, tool-sourced tour times, while Email 2 promises an unverified tomorrow-evening tour and offers no concrete slot. / order B picked 2: Email 2 answers every question with sourced facts and gives real, bookable evening tour times, while Email 1 promises an unverified tomorrow-evening tour with no times at all. Drops: concrete open tour times (Wednesday Oct 28 or Thursday Oct 29, latest 5:45 PM)
Inquiry: <user_message> Dear owner Leasing Agent. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Patricia, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments at 1235 Grant Street. We have a studio available now, 1 bath, 386 sq ft, at $950/mo, and right now new 12 month leases come with one month free. I can show it to you Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Patricia, Thanks for reaching out about 1235 Grant Street. We have a studio available now, and it comes with 1 month free on a 12-month new lease. I can show you around Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: invented_facts; tools: get_available_units | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both are warm, correct and offer the same tour windows, but Email 1 gives the studio's rent and size while Email 2 leaves Patricia without the basic facts she needs. / order B picked 2: Both are warm, correct and offer the same tour windows, but Email 2 adds the sourced rent and size the person needs while Email 1 leaves them out. Drops: rent $950/mo; 386 sq ft, 1 bath
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello I’m interested in the house however have a few questions. First is there other pictures of the inside of the house or back yard. Also is there any security deposit or any other fees to rent the property prior to moving in.. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Nathan, Thanks for reaching out about 2978 Emerald Circle, it's no longer available right now. I'm not able to send photos through this channel, but I'm happy to help you find something else that fits what you're looking for. As for fees, the standard security deposit is one month's rent and won't exceed two months' rent, and there's a $40 application fee per applicant. The exact deposit amount is confirmed once your application is reviewed. A few other homes are open right now: 2841 Morningside Court, a 4 bed, 2 bath at $2,300/mo, 2980 Emerald Circle, a 4 bed, 2.5 bath at $2,300/mo, and 363 Ember Ln, a 3 bed, 2 bath at $2,550/mo. Which of these would you like to see? | Hi Nathan, Thanks for reaching out about 2978 Emerald Circle. That home is no longer available. Here are three similar homes that are open now: 2980 Emerald Circle, a 4-bed, 2.5-bath at $2,300/mo 2841 Morningside Court, a 4-bed, 2-bath at $2,300/mo 363 Ember Ln, a 3-bed, 2-bath at $2,550/mo Here's what you'd pay before moving in. The security deposit is one month's rent. The application fee is $40 per applicant. You'd also pay the first month's rent and show proof of renter's insurance before move-in. Which of these homes would you like to see? |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 answers both of Nathan's questions (photos and pre-move-in costs) while Email 2 silently skips the photo request, even though Email 2 gives a slightly fuller picture of move-in costs. / order B picked 2: Email 2 answers both of Nathan's questions (photos and fees) in a warmer voice, while Email 1 skips the photo question entirely despite giving a slightly fuller fee rundown. Drops: answer to the photos question (no photos can be sent through this channel); the deposit can run up to two months' rent
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Tristan, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments. We have a studio available now, Unit 110, 1 bath, 444 sq ft, at $1,000/mo, and new 12-month leases come with one month free right now. What would you like to do next with this one? | Hi Tristan, Thanks for reaching out about 1235 Grant Street. We have a studio open now, and we're running a move-in special of 1 month free on 12-month new leases. What would you like to do next with this one? |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives the sourced rent and size for one named studio plus the special, while Email 2 leaves the person without any pricing; neither offers tour times. / order B picked 2: Both confirm the open studio and the special without proposing tour times, but Email 2 adds the rent, size and bath count the prospect needs, so it is the stronger first email. Drops: rent $1,000/mo; 444 sq ft, 1 bath
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Sara, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments, a studio at Unit 106 is available now at 386 sq ft and $950 a month, and we're currently offering one month free on 12 month leases. I'd be glad to set up a viewing, what day and time work best for you? | Hi Sara, Thanks for reaching out about 1235 Grant Street. We have a studio available now, and it comes with 1 month free on a 12-month new lease. I'd be glad to set up a viewing for you. What day and time work best for you? |
| checks failed: invented_facts; tools: get_available_units, save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives the sourced rent and square footage Sara needs while Email 2 only says a studio is open; both fail to offer specific viewing times, so Email 1's extra facts decide it. / order B picked 2: Both skip concrete tour slots, but Email 2 gives Sara the rent and size she needs while Email 1 leaves her with only 'a studio is open', so Email 2 is the more useful first reply despite the minor unit-number slip. Drops: rent $950/month; size 386 sq ft
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Patrick, Good to hear from you! Camellia Apartments has a studio open now, Unit 206, at $1,000/mo for 386 sqft, and we're also running one month free right now on 12-month leases. Since you're hoping to move in October 22nd, want to come take a look? I have Wednesday, October 28th at 10:00 AM or Thursday, October 29th at 10:00 AM, whichever works better for you. | Hi Patrick, Unit 106 at Camellia Apartments is a studio with 1 bath and 386 sq ft at $950/mo. It's available now, so it works for your October 22 move-in, and it comes with 1 month free on a 12-month new lease. What would you like to do next with this one? |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, check_availability | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both quote a real studio, its rent and the one-month-free special correctly, but only Email 1 offers actual tour slots and sounds like a warm agent, while Email 2 stalls with a vague question. / order B picked 2: Both quote sourced facts and the special, but only Email 2 offers real tour slots from check_availability and reads like a warm leasing agent, while Email 1 never moves toward a tour. Drops: concrete tour times (Wednesday Oct 28 or Thursday Oct 29 at 10:00 AM)
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Danielle, Unit 206 is a studio at $1,000/mo, 386 sqft, available now, and since you're looking at a 12-month lease it qualifies for our current move-in special of one month free. I can get you in for a tour Wednesday, October 28th at 10:00 AM or Thursday, October 29th at 2:00 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Danielle, Unit 106 at Camellia Apartments is open now. It's a studio with 1 bath and 386 sq ft at $950/mo. Since you're looking at a 12-month lease, it also comes with our move-in special of 1 month free on new 12-month leases. I need to correct my last email. The price and size range I gave you wasn't accurate, and that special doesn't have any "select apartments" or "restrictions" conditions on it. The terms are just what I wrote above. On your pet, what kind of animal is it? The pet fees I mentioned apply to pets. Service and assistance animals are always welcome and don't pay pet fees. You don't need to pick a time. Your tour is booked for Wednesday, October 7 at 10:30 AM at 1235 Grant Street. Looking forward to meeting you then. |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, check_availability | checks failed: invented_facts; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 correctly confirms the tour already on file while Email 1 ignores it and offers new slots, which outweighs Email 1's cleaner, shorter wording. / order B picked 1: Email 2 is cleaner and warmer but ignores the confirmed October 7 tour and offers new slots, which tells Danielle her booking doesn't exist; Email 1 is clunky but gets the home, rent, special and existing tour right.
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Got it, Juria — happy to help you find a studio at Camellia Apartments. What day and time would work best for a tour before your December 11th move-in? | Hi Juria, Camellia Apartments at 1235 Grant Street has a studio available now from $950/mo, and our Move-in Special gives you 1 month free on a 12-month new lease. Your virtual tour is confirmed for tomorrow, Tuesday, October 13 at 4:00 PM. You don't need to come to the property. The team will call you then at the number we have on file. |
| checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: | checks failed: none; tools: |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Email 2 answers the availability question with rent and the live special and correctly confirms the existing virtual tour, while Email 1 answers nothing and implies no tour exists. / order B picked 1: Email 1 answers the availability question with rent and the live special and confirms the booked tour, while Email 2 ignores the question and asks to schedule a tour that already exists.
Inquiry: <user_message> Do you have a viewing available around 4?. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Amanda, You're all set, no need to book anything new. Your tour for 2841 Morningside Court is already confirmed for today, Friday, October 9, at 4:30 PM. Looking forward to seeing you then! | Hi Amanda, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court. It's available now, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. Your tour there is already booked for today, Friday, October 9 at 4:30 PM, and a leasing agent will meet you at the home. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 2: Both correctly tell Amanda her 4:30 PM tour today is already confirmed, but Email 2 also gives the home's availability, layout, rent and who meets her, which Email 1 omits. / order B picked 1: Both correctly confirm the existing 4:30 PM tour today without rebooking, but Email 1 also gives the home's availability, size and rent that a first email should carry, while Email 2 omits them.
Can Clara move to a new model on today's prompt with nothing else changed? Each arm is judged against production's own reply on the same turn, in the same window, and held to production against itself.
| Arm | Bar | Lines that failed |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-5 (production run 2) | FAIL | reproduce: reference held 10, invented 0, dash 2; run 2 held 8, invented 0, dash 0; baseline v1 14 / 8 / 1 (allowed gap 6) |
| claude-opus-5-5 | PASS | no line failed |
Review set: 12 examples, phones and emails masked, names kept. Grade in chat: "#U4 today" (production better), "#U7 new" (the new model better), "tie", "wrong" (both wrong). Ledger: artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-28-upgrade-post-23123.json.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Mary, Ember Estates doesn't have a 2-bedroom open right now, but a 3-bedroom home at 363 Ember Ln is open now, 2 bath, 1,289 sq ft, at $2,550 a month. It comes with a Grand Opening Special: 6 Weeks FREE Rent plus Water, Sewer, and Trash included for your first year (you would cover electricity and internet), running through October 31 or while supplies last. I can show you around Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Mary Ann, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. There isn't a 2-bedroom open there right now, but we do have a 3-bedroom open, and it comes with our Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you'd just cover electricity and internet), running through October 31 or while supplies last, at $2,550 or $2,795 a month. I'd love to get you in to see it. I have Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM, would either work for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 commits to one concrete home with its rent, size and the special, while Email 2 hedges between two rents and omits the size, though Email 2 gets her name right and reads a touch warmer. / order B picked 2: Email 2 gives her a concrete home with rent, size and baths plus the special and tour times, while Email 1 is vague on price and specs; Email 2's only real slip is shortening her name. Drops: home size (1,289 sq ft, 2 bath); a single definite rent for the home being offered
Inquiry: <user_message> I'm interested in this property Zumper Listing: https://www.zumper.com/listings/24011074p/3-bedroom-foresight-park-grand-junction-co. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Mallary, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available, but we do have another 3-bedroom open now at $2,495 a month, and it comes with a move-in special: get 1 half month of rent free. You're all set for your tour this Saturday, October 3 at 11:00 AM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, and we'll walk you through that home then. | Hi Mallary, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available, but we do have another 3 bedroom open now at $2,495 a month, and it comes with the current move in special: Move-In Special! Get 1 HALF MONTH of Rent FREE! You're all set for your tour this Saturday, October 3 at 11:00 AM at 624 Eisenhauer Street. Looking forward to it! |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same facts (Unit 300 gone, a 3-bedroom open at $2,495 with the half-month-free special, the Saturday 11:00 AM tour on file), but Email 1 states the special in its own natural sentence while Email 2 drops in the raw listing blurb. / order B picked 2: Both emails give the same facts correctly, but Email 2 phrases the special in a natural voice and ties the existing tour to the open home.
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in NOW PRE-LEASING | 1.5 Months FREE | Brand-New Duplex Homes | Private Garages & Yards | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, the home at Ember Estates, 374 Ember Lane, is no longer available, and there's no 1-bedroom open there right now. Is there a particular area or neighborhood you're hoping to be near? That'll help me point you toward something that fits a 1-bedroom around $1,500 with your dog and cat. | Hi Emma, that listing isn't one I have pulled up by a specific address, so if you can share the exact street address I'll take a look for you. Ember Estates isn't available right now, but Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes still is, and I can get you in Thursday at 5:30 PM or Friday between 11:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or between 2:00 PM and 5:30 PM, if either works for you. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: no_invented_tour_time; tools: update_prospect |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 is short, correct and sticks to the records, while Email 2 invents tour times, re-asks which property, and names a unit number. / order B picked 2: Email 1 invents tour slots and asks for an address it already has, while Email 2 states only what the records support, so despite being thin it is the safer email to send. Drops: no 1-bedroom is open at Ember Estates right now
Inquiry: <user_message> I would like to schedule a tour.. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 12. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Megan, The home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available, so I'm not able to get you in for a tour there. For what it's worth, our standard lease length is 12 months, which lines up with what you're looking for, and our pet policy allows cats and dogs with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 per pet per month in pet rent. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. | Hi Megan, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road, it's no longer available right now, and we don't have another home open to offer at the moment. On pets, we welcome cats and dogs with a refundable $300 pet deposit and $35/month pet rent per pet (limit two). Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 directly addresses the tour request, confirms the 12-month lease she asked about, and covers pets, while Email 2 skips the lease point and talks about other homes being closed. / order B picked 2: Both correctly say the home is gone and quote the on-file pet terms, but Email 2 directly answers the tour ask, confirms the 12-month lease she wants, and reads more smoothly. Drops: 12-month standard lease matches what she asked for; explicitly addresses her tour request (can't tour an unavailable home)
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Mary, Ember Estates doesn't have a 2-bedroom open right now, but a 3-bedroom home at 363 Ember Ln is open now, 2 bath, 1,289 sq ft, at $2,550 a month. It comes with a Grand Opening Special: 6 Weeks FREE Rent plus Water, Sewer, and Trash included for your first year (you would cover electricity and internet), running through October 31 or while supplies last. I can show you around Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM. Which works better for you? | Hi Mary Ann, Thanks for reaching out about Ember Estates at 374 Ember Lane. There isn't a 2-bedroom open there right now, but a 3-bedroom is available at $2,550/mo. Its listing has a Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks of free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year. You'd pay electricity and internet. The special runs until October 31 or until supplies last. Could a 3-bedroom work for you? I can show you around Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM. |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both say no 2-bedroom is open and offer the same 3-bedroom, special and tour slots, but Email 1 adds the sourced bath count and square footage she needs to judge the home, outweighing its slightly clipped greeting. / order B picked 2: Both correctly say no 2-bedroom is open and present the $2,550 3-bedroom with the special and the same tour slots, but email 2 adds the size and bath count the person needs, while its only slip is the shortened greeting. Drops: 2 baths; 1,289 sq ft
Inquiry: <user_message> I found 486-32 1/8 32 1 8 Rd on Homes.com and would like to learn more about it. Thanks!. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Erika, 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. | Hi Erika, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road in Clifton. The home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly say the home is gone and close with the warm line, but Email 2's redundant repetition of the address is unnecessary filler while Email 1 says the same thing cleanly. / order B picked 2: Both correctly say the home is gone and close warmly without promising follow-up; Email 2 does it without the redundant repetition of the address.
Inquiry: <user_message> I would like to schedule a tour.. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 12. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Megan, The home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available, so I'm not able to get you in for a tour there. For what it's worth, our standard lease length is 12 months, which lines up with what you're looking for, and our pet policy allows cats and dogs with a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 per pet per month in pet rent. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. | Hi Megan, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road. The home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available. For future reference, cats and dogs are welcome where pets are allowed. There's a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 a month in pet rent for each pet. Our leases are 12 months. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly say the home is gone and give the same pet and lease facts, but Email 1 explicitly answers the tour ask and reads tighter and more natural. / order B picked 2: Both correctly say the home is gone and give the same pet and lease facts, but email 2 directly answers the tour ask and reads more naturally without the redundant address repetition.
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Tomorrow evening doesn't work, but for 363 Ember Ln ($2,550/mo, and it comes with the Grand Opening Special, 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year, with you covering electricity and internet, running through October 31 or while supplies last) I can get you in Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 and 9:45 AM, between 10:30 AM and 12:30 PM, or between 1:00 and 5:45 PM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM, between 1:00 and 1:45 PM, or between 2:30 and 5:45 PM. Which works best for you? On the pet, the pet deposit is $300 refundable and pet rent runs $35 per pet per month, with a limit of two pets, and every pet gets registered through OurPetPolicy before move in. An 18 month lease works too, we're currently running a promotion on longer leases from 14 to 18 months. | Hi Michael, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 363 Ember Ln at Ember Estates (374 Ember Lane). It's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,550/mo. Its listing has a Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks of free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year. You'd pay for electricity and internet, and the special runs until Oct 31 or while supplies last. On lease length, we're offering longer leases of 14 to 18 months right now as a promotion. Cats and dogs are welcome. There's a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35 a month in pet rent per pet. What kind of pet do you have? I'd be glad to set up a tour for you. What time tomorrow evening works best? |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 actually answers the only question asked with sourced tour windows and all pet/lease facts, while Email 2 dodges the tour question with an unchecked 'what time tomorrow evening' despite reading more warmly. / order B picked 2: Email 2 actually answers the tour question with sourced slots and tells him tomorrow evening isn't open, while Email 1 leaves him expecting a tour time that was never checked, even though Email 1 is warmer and gives the home's size. Drops: that tomorrow evening is not available; concrete tour slots (Wed Oct 28 / Thu Oct 29 windows); two-pet limit and OurPetPolicy registration
Inquiry: <user_message> Dear owner Leasing Agent. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Patricia, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments at 1235 Grant Street. We have a studio open now, Unit 110, 1 bath at 444 sq ft for $1,000/mo, and it comes with one month free on a 12 month lease. I can show you around Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM, whichever works better for you. | Hi Patricia, Thanks for reaching out about 1235 Grant Street. We have a studio available now, and new 12-month leases come with 1 month free. I can show you around Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both are warm, correct and offer the same tour windows and special, but Email 1 adds the sourced rent and size for the one open studio while Email 2 leaves her with no price at all. / order B picked 2: Both are warm and offer the same tour windows and special, but Email 2 also gives the rent and size the person needs while Email 1 leaves them out. Drops: rent $1,000/mo; 444 sq ft, 1 bath
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Tristan, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments, we have a studio available now, starting at $950 a month, and new 12-month leases come with one month free. What would you like to do next with this one? | Hi Tristan, Thanks for reaching out about 1235 Grant Street. We have a studio available now, and new 12-month leases come with 1 month free. What would you like to do next with this one? |
| checks failed: none; tools: get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails are near-identical and neither offers tour times, but Email 1 adds the sourced $950 rent that the prospect needs while Email 2 leaves them with no price. / order B picked 2: Both are near-identical and neither proposes tour times, but Email 2 adds the sourced $950 rent the person needs, so it is the more useful first email. Drops: Rent for the open studio ($950/month)
Inquiry: <user_message> Interested in Camellia Apartments </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Sara, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments. We have a studio available now at $950/mo, about 386 square feet, and it comes with one month free on a new 12-month lease. I'd be glad to set up a viewing. What day and time would work best for you? | Hi Sara, Thanks for reaching out about 1235 Grant Street. We have a studio open now, and new 12-month leases come with our Move-in Special of 1 month free. I'd be glad to set up a viewing for you. What day and time work best? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives Sara the rent and size from the unit data plus the special, while Email 2 omits the rent entirely; both fail to offer specific tour slots. / order B picked 2: Both are warm and correct, but Email 2 adds the sourced rent and square footage the person needs while Email 1 leaves her with no price at all. Drops: rent $950/mo; about 386 square feet
Inquiry: <user_message> Listing Notes - Phone call. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Vitaliy, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 364 Ember Ln at Ember Estates (374 Ember Lane), it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,795/mo. There's also a Grand Opening Special right now: six weeks of free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (electricity and internet are on you), good through October 31 or while supplies last. I'd love to show it to you. I have Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM, whichever works better for you. | Hi Vitaliy, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 364 Ember Ln at Ember Estates (374 Ember Lane). It's available now: a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,289 sq ft at $2,795/mo. It also comes with the Grand Opening Special, which gives you 6 weeks of free rent plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year. You'd cover electricity and internet. The special runs until Oct 31 or until supplies last. It's ready in time for your October 31 move-in. I see you'd like to talk by phone. When you pick a tour time, just send me the best number to reach you. I can show you around Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 9:30 AM and 12:15 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same home, rent, size, special terms and tour windows, but Email 1 says it in a tighter, more natural voice while Email 2 adds an assumed phone-call request and slightly awkward phrasing. / order B picked 2: Both give the same home, rent, size, special and tour windows, but Email 2 says it cleanly and naturally while Email 1 adds an inferred phone-call request that clutters the close.
Is Opus's first email better than production's?
The judge says yes: Opus wrote the better email on 21 of 30 cards, the same on 7, and production was better on 2. Today's send check would hold 10 of production's emails and 9 of Opus's. 0 Spanish cards in this tier.
| # | Who wrote in | Customer | Judge | Production | Opus | Fede |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patrick Culhane | Camellia | Production better | sends | sends | |
| 2 | Michael Asti | Western Slope | Production better | held | sends | |
| 3 | Erika Loyo | Western Slope | Same | sends | sends | |
| 4 | Tristan Durov | Camellia | Same | sends | sends | |
| 5 | Danielle Coleman | Camellia | Same | sends | sends | |
| 6 | Vitaliy Glazman | Western Slope | Same | sends | sends | |
| 7 | Kyle windscheffel | Western Slope | Same | sends | sends | |
| 8 | David Jones | Western Slope | Same | sends | sends | |
| 9 | Patricia Li | Camellia | Same | sends | sends | |
| 10 | Juria Tsutsui | Camellia | Opus better | held | held | |
| 11 | Megan crawford | Western Slope | Opus better | sends | sends | |
| 12 | Elizabeth DONLAN | Western Slope | Opus better | held | held | |
| 13 | Sara Bryant | Camellia | Opus better | sends | sends | |
| 14 | Emma Clark | Western Slope | Opus better | sends | sends | |
| 15 | Carmen Casias | Western Slope | Opus better | sends | sends | |
| 16 | Owen Dai | Western Slope | Opus better | sends | sends | |
| 17 | Cylus Bradford | Western Slope | Opus better | held | held | |
| 18 | Natalee Madsen | Western Slope | Opus better | sends | held | |
| 19 | Tiffani Hazelwood | Western Slope | Opus better | sends | sends | |
| 20 | Mary Ann Boren | Western Slope | Opus better | sends | held | |
| 21 | Mallary Williams | Western Slope | Opus better | sends | held | |
| 22 | Amanda Derryberry | Western Slope | Opus better | held | held | |
| 23 | Steven Fernandez | Western Slope | Opus better | sends | sends | |
| 24 | Jessalyn Rospert | Western Slope | Opus better | sends | sends | |
| 25 | Angele Tatem | Western Slope | Opus better | sends | sends | |
| 26 | Keyvis Gilmore | Western Slope | Opus better | held | sends | |
| 27 | Nathan Law | Western Slope | Opus better | held | held | |
| 28 | Queen Olafadehan | Camellia | Opus better | held | held | |
| 29 | Emma Clark | Western Slope | Opus better | held | sends | |
| 30 | Yoira E. Estrada | Camellia | Opus better | held | sends |
#1 · Patrick Culhane · Camellia Production better
Their latest message:
Interested in Camellia Apartments
Renter:
[AppFolio Property Manager]
New Lead for 1235 Grant Street
CONTACT INFO
patrick culhane
[email]
COMMENTS
Reason For Moving: None.
Reply
PREFERENCES
Baths: 0.0
Move In Date: 10/22/2026
LEAD INFO
Source: Apartments.com
Received: 10/21/2026 04:26 AM
Interested in: Camellia Apartments
View the guest card for this lead.
If you would like to stop receiving these emails, please click the link below to change your notification settings:
AppFolio Property Manager
70 Castilian Dr., Santa Barbara, CA 93117
[phone]
© 2026 AppFolio, Inc.
Clara:
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments! We've got studios running $950–$1,000/mo (around 386–444 sqft), plus a one-bedroom at $1,200/mo (556 sqft). We're also running one month free on 12-month leases right now, on select apartments — restrictions may apply.
Since you're hoping to move in October 22nd, let's get a tour on the books soon — what day and time works best for you?
Judge: Production better. Both quote the correct studio, rent, size and special, but only Production offers concrete tour slots and sounds like a leasing agent, while its before-move-in slip is minor next to Opus's missing tour push. Opus left out: concrete tour times (Wed Oct 28 10:00 AM / Thu Oct 29 2:00 PM).
#2 · Michael Asti · Western Slope Production better
Their latest message:
hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour.
I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18.
Renter:
[]
today
[]
tomorrow
Hi, would you be available today evening or tomorrow morning for a tour?
Clara:
[Context note, never write this in a reply: sent Friday, October 2, 2026 at 1:02 PM. Any day, time or open slot named below was true then, not necessarily now.]
2980 Emerald Circle is no longer available, but I can show you a few other homes open now: 2841 Morningside Court (4 bed/2 bath), 2863 Florida Street (3 bed/2 bath), or 363 Ember Ln (3 bed/2 bath).
For today, our office hours end at 5 PM, so evening tours aren't an option — but tomorrow (Saturday) I've got openings between 10:00 and 10:30 AM, or between 12:00 PM and 1:30 PM. Would one of those work, and which home would you like to see?
Renter:
[]
tomorrow
Hi, would you be available to do a tour tomorrow morning or evening?
Clara:
[Context note, never write this in a reply: sent Friday, October 2, 2026 at 6:20 PM. Any day, time or open slot named below was true then, not necessarily now.]
Hi there,
The home at 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available. I do have a few other homes open right now: 2841 Morningside Court (4BR/2BA, $2,300/mo), 2863 Florida Street (3BR/2BA, $2,775/mo), and 363 Ember Ln (3BR/2BA, $2,795/mo).
For tomorrow I can do 10:00 AM, or anytime between 12:00 and 1:30 PM — which works, and which home would you like to see?
Judge: Production better. Production actually answers the tour question with real checked slots while Opus skips the check and leaves the tour hanging, which outweighs Opus's cleaner tone and single-home focus. Opus left out: that tomorrow evening is not open for a tour; concrete tour times (Wednesday Oct 28 or Thursday Oct 29 at 5:30 PM). Production left out: an explicit statement that 363 Ember Ln is available now.
#3 · Erika Loyo · Western Slope Same
What they wrote:
I found 486-32 1/8 32 1 8 Rd on Homes.com and would like to learn more about it. Thanks!. Reason For Moving: None.
Judge: Same. The judge leaned to production one way round and called them equal the other way, so it counts as a tie. Both correctly say the home is gone and close with the required warm line; they differ only in a redundant repeated phrase in Opus versus bare terseness in Production.
#4 · Tristan Durov · Camellia Same
Their latest message:
Interested in Camellia Apartments
Renter:
[AppFolio Property Manager]
New Lead for 1235 Grant Street
CONTACT INFO
Tristan Durov
[email]
[phone]
COMMENTS
Reason For Moving: None.
Reply
PREFERENCES
Move In Date: 12/02/2026
LEAD INFO
Source: Apartments.com
Received: 10/21/2026 01:52 AM
Interested in: Camellia Apartments
View the guest card for this lead.
If you would like to stop receiving these emails, please click the link below to change your notification settings:
AppFolio Property Manager
70 Castilian Dr., Santa Barbara, CA 93117
[phone]
© 2026 AppFolio, Inc.
Judge: Same. The judge leaned to Opus one way round and called them equal the other way, so it counts as a tie. Both give the same open studio, rent, size and special with no tour offer; Opus edges ahead by quoting the special's new-lease terms exactly and tying the reply to his December 2 move-in.
#5 · Danielle Coleman · Camellia Same You graded this card before (#25 in the Oct 24 set).
Their latest message:
Interested in Camellia Apartments
Renter:
[AppFolio Property Manager]
New Lead for 1235 Grant Street
CONTACT INFO
Danielle Coleman
[email]
[phone]
COMMENTS
I would like to schedule a tour.. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 12.
Reply
PREFERENCES
Pets: other
LEAD INFO
Source: Zillow Rental Network
Received: 10/01/2026 09:51 PM
Interested in: Camellia Apartments
View the guest card for this lead.
If you would like to stop receiving these emails, please click the link below to change your notification settings:
AppFolio Property Manager
70 Castilian Dr., Santa Barbara, CA 93117
[phone]
© 2026 AppFolio, Inc.
Clara:
Hi Danielle,
Thanks for reaching out, and good to know you've got a pet coming along — we're pet-friendly here (there's a $250 one-time pet fee, a $100 refundable pet deposit, and $35/mo pet rent). Since you're thinking 12 months, you'd also be in line for our current move-in special: one month free on new 12-month leases, on select apartments, restrictions may apply. Right now we've got studios and one-bedrooms running $1,000–$1,200/mo, roughly 386–585 sqft.
I'd love to get a tour on the books for you — what's a day and time that works best?
Judge: Same. The judge leaned to Opus one way round and called them both wrong the other way, so it counts as a tie. Production is warm and factually sourced but ignores the confirmed tour and offers new slots, while Opus handles the booked tour correctly but misdescribes the studio as a 1-bed and includes a strange self-correction, so neither is fit to send as is. Opus left out: pet fee $250 one-time, $100 refundable pet deposit, $35/mo pet rent (she told us she has a pet). Production left out: Danielle already has a confirmed tour Wednesday, October 7 at 10:30 AM at 1235 Grant Street.
#6 · Vitaliy Glazman · Western Slope Same
What they wrote:
Listing Notes - Phone call.
Judge: Same. The judge leaned to production one way round and called them equal the other way, so it counts as a tie. Both give the same home, rent, size, special terms and valid tour windows; Production reads a touch warmer and more natural, tying the tour to the October 31 move-in.
#7 · Kyle windscheffel · Western Slope Same
What they wrote:
I am interested in touring 2841 Morningside Ct..
Judge: Same. The judge leaned to Opus one way round and called them equal the other way, so it counts as a tie. Both emails state the home is open, give rent, size and layout, offer two sourced tour windows and ask which works, differing only in wording and which Thursday window they picked.
#8 · David Jones · Western Slope Same
What they wrote:
367 Ember Ln, awaiting your reply Western Slope Property Management
Message in Zillow Rental Manager: https://www.zillow.com/rental-manager/inbox/u6gfa757ygvs?byProperty=true.
Judge: Same. The judge called them equal both ways round. Both emails give the same availability, size, rent and two valid tour windows from the records, with only different (but equally sourced) Wednesday slot choices and phrasing.
#9 · Patricia Li · Camellia Same
What they wrote:
Dear owner Leasing Agent.
Judge: Same. The judge called them equal both ways round. Both emails give the same open studio, rent, special, and tour windows with no errors; Production is marginally warmer and Opus marginally shorter, so they are effectively equivalent.
#10 · Juria Tsutsui · Camellia Opus better
Their latest message:
Interested in Camellia Apartments
Renter:
[AppFolio Property Manager]
New Lead for 1235 Grant Street
CONTACT INFO
Juria Tsutsui
[email]
[phone]
COMMENTS
Hello! Are the studio apartments still available?. Reason For Moving: None.
Reply
PREFERENCES
Move In Date: 12/11/2026
LEAD INFO
Source: Apartments.com
Received: 10/12/2026 02:07 PM
Interested in: Camellia Apartments
View the guest card for this lead.
If you would like to stop receiving these emails, please click the link below to change your notification settings:
AppFolio Property Manager
70 Castilian Dr., Santa Barbara, CA 93117
[phone]
© 2026 AppFolio, Inc.
Clara:
Hi Juria,
Good news — we do have studios available, running around 386–444 sqft at $1,000/mo. We're also running a one month free special on 12-month leases right now (on select apartments, restrictions may apply).
What day and time would work best for a tour, ahead of your December 11th move-in?
Judge: Opus better. Opus answers the availability question with sourced facts, surfaces the special, and correctly confirms the existing virtual tour, while Production gives no facts and wrongly tries to schedule a tour the person already has. Production left out: studio is available now; 386 sq ft, 1-bath, from $950/mo; 1 month free on a 12-month new lease; confirmed virtual tour Tuesday, October 13 at 4:00 PM, team will call them.
#11 · Megan crawford · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
I would like to schedule a tour.. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 12.
Judge: Opus better. Both correctly say the home is gone and quote the on-file pet deposit and rent, but Opus also confirms the 12-month lease Megan mentioned and reads more naturally. Production left out: Leases are 12 months (the person specified a 12-month lease).
#12 · Elizabeth DONLAN · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
Listing Notes - I terested in 4 bed house in fruitcake.
Judge: Opus better. Both emails give the same home facts and confirm the existing Monday 4:30 PM tour, but Opus adds the sourced, useful detail that a leasing agent meets them at the home, while Production's "I'll see you then" is a slightly misleading sign-off. Production left out: a leasing agent will meet them at the home for the tour.
#13 · Sara Bryant · Camellia Opus better
Their latest message:
Interested in Camellia Apartments
Renter:
[AppFolio Property Manager]
New Lead for 1235 Grant Street
CONTACT INFO
Sara Bryant
[email]
[phone]
COMMENTS
I am interested in this rental and would like to schedule a viewing. Please let me know when this would be possible..
Reply
LEAD INFO
Source: Zillow Rental Network
Received: 09/30/2026 08:51 AM
Interested in: Camellia Apartments
View the guest card for this lead.
If you would like to stop receiving these emails, please click the link below to change your notification settings:
AppFolio Property Manager
70 Castilian Dr., Santa Barbara, CA 93117
[phone]
© 2026 AppFolio, Inc.
Judge: Opus better. Both give the same correct facts (studio, 386 sq ft, 1 bath, $950/mo, one month free on a 12-month new lease) and neither proposes actual tour slots, but Opus reads like a natural leasing agent while Production is a single breathless run-on sentence.
#14 · Emma Clark · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
Emma matched with and expressed interest in Beautiful 3br Townhome w 1-car Garage (2024) | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat.
Judge: Opus better. Both give the same unit, rent, special, no-1-bedroom note, pet terms and valid tour windows, but only Opus closes the loop on Ember Estates with its recorded not-available status. Production left out: Ember Estates, which Emma also inquired about, is no longer available.
#15 · Carmen Casias · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
Carmen matched with and expressed interest in Pomona Park Townhomes | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (27 days away!) | BEDS: Studio | BUDGET: $900 | PETS: Renter has no pets | AMENITIES: On-Site Laundry.
Judge: Opus better. Opus states the special with its correct rent and terms as the records require, while Production misattributes the special to the wrong 3-bedroom; both otherwise cover Unit 300, the no-studio fact, size, rent and valid tour windows. Production left out: the move-in special belongs to the 3-bedroom listed at $2,495/mo, not the one from $2,395/mo.
#16 · Owen Dai · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
Interested in Northridge Apartments
Judge: Opus better. Both give the same correct availability, size and rent, but Opus explains the self-guided visit properly (lockbox code sent) and reads more naturally. Production left out: that Owen will be sent the lockbox code for the self-guided visit.
#17 · Cylus Bradford · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
Interested in Pomona Park Townhomes
Judge: Opus better. Both emails correctly confirm the existing tour and give the open 3-bedroom's facts, but Opus adds the sourced detail that a leasing agent meets them at the home, which helps them on arrival. Production left out: a leasing agent will meet them at the home for the tour.
#18 · Natalee Madsen · Western Slope Opus better You graded this card before (#30 in the Oct 24 set).
What they wrote:
Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards..
Judge: Opus better. Opus quotes the special beside the rent it actually belongs to while Production misattributes the special to the $2,300 home. Production left out: the special belongs to the 3-bedroom listed at $2,550 or $2,795 a month, not the $2,300 rent.
#19 · Tiffani Hazelwood · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
Hello, I'd like more information about 565 Redcliff Cir unit 585-201..
Judge: Opus better. Both correctly name the unit, price and the tour already on file, but Opus adds sourced lease-length and deposit facts that answer a general information request and reads more naturally without the repeated 'self-guided'. Production left out: Leases are 12 months; Security deposit is typically one month's rent and won't exceed two months' rent.
#20 · Mary Ann Boren · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards..
Judge: Opus better. Opus correctly scopes the 1.5-months-free special to the $2,550/$2,795 listings as the records require, while Production implies the $2,300 home carries it; Production is warmer and tighter but that misstatement is the bigger problem. Production left out: the special applies only to the 3-bedrooms priced at $2,550 or $2,795 a month.
#21 · Mallary Williams · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
I'm interested in this property
Zumper Listing: https://www.zumper.com/listings/24011074p/3-bedroom-foresight-park-grand-junction-co.
Judge: Opus better. Opus gives the special and correctly confirms her existing tour, while Production ignores the booked tour and offers fresh slots as if she had none. Production left out: the half-month-free move-in special on the open 3-bedroom listed at $2,495/mo; that she already has a confirmed tour Saturday, October 3 at 11:00 AM at 624 Eisenhauer Street, met by a leasing agent.
#22 · Amanda Derryberry · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
Do you have a viewing available around 4?. Reason For Moving: None.
Judge: Opus better. Both correctly confirm the existing 4:30 PM tour today, but Opus also names the home's availability, rent and size and tells her an agent meets her at the home, while Production gives none of those facts. Production left out: the home is available now; 4-bedroom, 2-bath, 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo; a leasing agent will meet them at the home.
#23 · Steven Fernandez · Western Slope Opus better You graded this card before (#26 in the Oct 24 set).
What they wrote:
Info Request: Move-in 10/09/2026
I saw your rental listing on Zumper and would like to learn more.
Zumper Listing: https://www.zumper.com/apartment-buildings/p1642949/northridge-apartments-ridgway-co.
Judge: Opus better. Both give the same home facts, but Opus honors the tour already on file with the Zoom link while Production wrongly offers to book one from scratch. Production left out: Steven already has a confirmed virtual tour on Sunday, September 27 at 10:00 AM; the video tour link to join that tour.
#24 · Jessalyn Rospert · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
Jessalyn matched with and expressed interest in Pomona Park Townhomes | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (19 days away!) | BEDS: 2 | BUDGET: $1,800 | PETS: Renter has no pets.
Judge: Opus better. Both say Unit 300 is gone, no 2-bedroom is open, describe the 3-bedroom and offer the same tour windows, but Production misattributes the special to the wrong home while Opus places it correctly beside the $2,495 rent. Production left out: the move-in special belongs to the 3-bedroom listed at $2,495/mo, not the $2,395 home.
#25 · Angele Tatem · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
Interested in Northridge Apartments
Judge: Opus better. Both emails are otherwise identical and correct, but Opus includes the required note that the lockbox code will be sent for the self-guided visit. Production left out: that the lockbox code will be sent to them for the self-guided visit.
#26 · Keyvis Gilmore · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
I'm interested in your property and would like to move forward. Can you send me an application for this property?
Message in Zillow Rental Manager: https://www.zillow.com/rental-manager/inbox/4fr53kdcs2q85?byProperty=true. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 12.
Judge: Opus better. Both correctly report the application was already sent today, but Opus also gives the home's availability, size, rent, lease length and concrete tour times in a warm agent voice, while Production is bare. Production left out: 2863 Florida Street is available now; 3 bed / 2 bath, 1,435 sq ft; $2,775/mo rent; 12-month lease length; concrete tour times (Wed Oct 28, Thu Oct 29).
#27 · Nathan Law · Western Slope Opus better
What they wrote:
Hello I’m interested in the house however have a few questions. First is there other pictures of the inside of the house or back yard. Also is there any security deposit or any other fees to rent the property prior to moving in.. Reason For Moving: None.
Judge: Opus better. Both correctly report the home is gone, offer the same alternatives and decline photos, but Opus more fully answers the pre-move-in cost question with sourced facts (first month's rent, renter's insurance) that Production omits. Production left out: first month's rent is paid before move-in; proof of renter's insurance with at least $100,000 liability is required before move-in.
#28 · Queen Olafadehan · Camellia Opus better
What they wrote:
Hello, I'm interested in a studio apartment (unit 206/606) at Camellia Apartments and am looking to move in around October 14. Do you offer 6-month lease options? I'd also like to know what
additional monthly fees are charged besides the base rent, such as utilities, parking, trash, or other community fees. Thank you!. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 1.
Judge: Opus better. Both are accurate and confirm the existing tour, but Opus also answers the community-fee question (no admin fee) and reads more naturally in short paragraphs. Production left out: there is no admin fee (answers the 'other community fees' part of the question); utilities are billed to the resident portal and paid along with rent.
#29 · Emma Clark · Western Slope Opus better
Their latest message:
Emma matched with and expressed interest in NOW PRE-LEASING | 1.5 Months FREE | Brand-New Duplex Homes | Private Garages & Yards | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat.
Renter:
Emma matched with and expressed interest in Beautiful 3br Townhome w 1-car Garage (2024) | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat.
Clara:
Hi Emma,
Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is open now — a 3-bedroom; there's no 1-bedroom open right now. It's 3 bed/2.5 bath, 1,528 sqft, running $2,495/mo. We're pet-friendly for both your dog and cat — there's a $300 refundable pet deposit and $35/month pet rent per pet.
Want to come take a look? I can offer Thursday, October 22, 2026 at 5:30 PM, or Friday, October 23, 2026 between 11:30 AM and 12:00 PM, or between 2:00 PM and 5:30 PM. Let me know which works best for you and I'll get it set up.
Judge: Opus better. Opus gives the real open Ember Estates home, rent, size, special, pet fees and the actual tour slots, while Production wrongly says the property is unavailable and offers made-up tour times; Opus's only serious flaw is its unwarranted retraction of the Pomona Park option. Opus left out: Pomona Park Unit 405 remains an open 3-bedroom at $2,495/mo (Email 2 wrongly tells her to disregard it). Production left out: Ember Estates is open with a 3-bedroom, 2-bath (363 Ember Ln, 1,289 sq ft, $2,550/mo); the Grand Opening Special (6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer, trash for the first year, resident pays electricity and internet, through Oct 31 or while supplies last); no 1-bedroom is open at Ember Estates; pet deposit $300 total and pet rent $35 per pet per month; the real tour slots (Wed Oct 28 and Thu Oct 29).
#30 · Yoira E. Estrada · Camellia Opus better You graded this card before (#36 in the Oct 24 set).
Their latest message:
Hello, I'd like more information about Camellia Apartments..
Renter:
Zillow Rentals Inquiry
New Contact
Yoira Estrada says:
"I'm interested in your property and would like to move forward. Can you send me an application for this property?"
Income and time frame
Credit score
660 to 719
Yearly income
$42000
Lease length
12 months
Pets
None, no pets
[email]
[phone]
Your listing
[Listing photo]
FOR RENT
$1,150+
Studio to 2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom
1235 N Grant St, Denver, CO
See all listing details
Zillow, Inc.
1301 Second Avenue, Floor 36
Seattle, WA 98101
© 2006-2026
Privacy policy
Clara:
[Context note, never write this in a reply: sent Thursday, June 4, 2026 at 7:01 PM. Any day, time or open slot named below was true then, not necessarily now.]
Hi Yoira! Great to hear from you — here's the application link to get started:
https://www.camelliadenver.com/#floor-plans
While you're at it, we have a nice range of options available right now. Studios are running $1,150/mo (386–462 sqft), one-bedrooms at $1,350/mo (540–585 sqft), and a two-bedroom at $1,650/mo (666 sqft). We're also currently offering 1 month free on select apartments, restrictions may apply — so there's a great opportunity to save.
If you'd like to come see the place before or after applying, I have openings as soon as tomorrow morning or afternoon. Would any of those work for you?
Renter:
[AppFolio Property Manager]
New Lead for 1235 Grant Street
CONTACT INFO
Yoira Estrada
[email]
[phone]
COMMENTS
I would like to schedule a tour.. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 6.
Reply
LEAD INFO
Source: Zillow Rental Network
Received: 10/03/2026 03:58 AM
Interested in: Camellia Apartments
View the guest card for this lead.
If you would like to stop receiving these emails, please click the link below to change your notification settings:
AppFolio Property Manager
70 Castilian Dr., Santa Barbara, CA 93117
[phone]
© 2026 AppFolio, Inc.
Judge: Opus better. Opus gives the availability, size, rent, special, lease terms, application link and tour confirmation the person needs, while Production only covers lease terms and the tour. Production left out: Unit 402 is no longer available; a studio is open now; the open studio is 1-bath, 386 sq ft, from $950/mo; the application link https://jpco.appfolio.com/listings.
Names kept, phones and emails taken out. Emails and inputs are quoted exactly as written, dashes included. The other arms of this run (production run a second time, Opus with a goal block) are in the run details further down. Ledger: artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-28-upgrade-post-23161.json.
Can Clara move to a new model on today's prompt with nothing else changed? Each arm is judged against production's own reply on the same turn, in the same window, and held to production against itself.
| Arm | Bar | Lines that failed |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-5 (production run 2) | PASS | no line failed |
| claude-sonnet-5-5 | FAIL | never_do: no_em_dash 0 new (run 2: 1); invented_facts 2 new (run 2: 0); no_team_told 1 new (run 2: 1) quality: production better on 16, this arm better on 8, tie 6 (run 2: production better 7, allowed 9) graded: production better on 5 of 9 graded cards (run 2: 3) |
| claude-opus-5-5 | FAIL | never_do: no_em_dash 0 new (run 2: 1); invented_facts 3 new (run 2: 0); no_team_told 0 new (run 2: 1); no_empty_reply 1 new (run 2: 0) facts: drops a fact production gave on 10 (run 2: 7, allowed 9) quality: production better on 17, this arm better on 8, tie 5 (run 2: production better 7, allowed 9) graded: production better on 5 of 9 graded cards (run 2: 3) |
Review set: 20 examples, phones and emails masked, names kept. Grade in chat: "#U4 today" (production better), "#U7 new" (the new model better), "tie", "wrong" (both wrong). Ledger: artifacts/clara-review-set-2026-10-27-upgrade.json.
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in NOW PRE-LEASING | 1.5 Months FREE | Brand-New Duplex Homes | Private Garages & Yards | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, That listing isn't one of the homes we currently have open, but Pomona Park Townhomes at 624 Eisenhauer Street still has Unit 405 open now — pet friendly for your dog and cat. Want to go ahead and book a tour? I have Tuesday, October 27 between 5:00 and 5:15 PM, or Wednesday, October 28 in the morning or afternoon, whichever works better for you. | Hi Emma, Ember Estates doesn't have a 1-bedroom open right now, so that one's not a fit for this budget. The home I mentioned earlier, the 3-bedroom at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street, unit 405, $2,495/mo), is still open if you'd like to see it, pets and all. Want me to get you booked for a tour there? |
| checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: | checks failed: none; tools: |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 plainly redirects to the open home with real tour slots and avoids the budget comparison, while Email 2 adds rent and size but breaks the budget rule and leaves the tour vague. / order B picked 2: Email 2 plainly marks the new listing as unavailable, redirects to the open Pomona Park unit with pets covered, and offers real tour times, while Email 1 has no slots and an awkward budget remark. Drops: concrete tour times (Tue Oct 27 5:15 PM, Wed Oct 28 morning/afternoon)
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Thanks for letting me know you're interested in 363 Ember Ln. The good news on lease length: this home is currently offering longer leases of 14 to 18 months as a promotion, so an 18 month term works perfectly here. On the pet, since it's listed as "Other," I'd love to know exactly what kind of pet it is to make sure it fits our policy. In general we welcome cats and dogs, with a refundable pet deposit of $300 total and pet rent of $35 per pet per month. For touring, I don't have anything open tomorrow evening for this home, but the earliest opening I have is Wednesday, October 28, anytime between 1:00 PM and 5:45 PM. Would 5:00 PM or 5:30 PM work, or is there another time in that window you'd prefer? | Thanks for narrowing it down to 363 Ember Ln! It's a 3 bed, 2 bath home at 1,289 sq ft for $2,550/mo, and right now it comes with a grand opening special: 6 weeks free rent plus water, sewer, and trash included for your first year (you'd just cover electricity and internet) — that special runs through October 31 or while supplies last. An 18 month lease works too, since we're currently offering longer terms of 14 to 18 months as a promotion. As for your pet, there's a refundable $300 pet deposit and $35/month pet rent, with a two pet limit, and every pet gets registered through OurPetPolicy before move in. For tomorrow evening, I can do 5:00 PM or 5:45 PM — which works better for you? I'll also need your full name to get the tour booked. |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect | checks failed: no_em_dash; tools: check_availability, update_prospect |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 2 is far more complete on home facts, but inventing a tomorrow-evening tour slot the calendar did not return is a worse error than Email 1's omissions, since Email 1's times are sourced and nothing it says is false. / order B picked 2: Email 1 gives every home fact but invents a tour time its tools did not return, while Email 2 honestly offers the real Oct 28 window yet drops the rent, size and special it was supposed to lead with.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello I’m interested in the house however have a few questions. First is there other pictures of the inside of the house or back yard. Also is there any security deposit or any other fees to rent the property prior to moving in.. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Nathan, Thanks for reaching out. The home at 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available. A few other homes we have open right now are 2841 Morningside Court in Grand Junction, 81503, a 4 bedroom, 2 bath at $2,300/mo, 2980 Emerald Circle in Grand Junction, 81504, a 4 bedroom, 2.5 bath also at $2,300/mo, and 363 Ember Ln in Grand Junction, 81501, a 3 bedroom, 2 bath at $2,550/mo. I don't have extra interior or backyard photos to send over, but once you pick a home I'm happy to get a tour set up so you can see it in person. On fees, the standard security deposit is typically one month's rent and never more than two months, with the exact amount confirmed per home, and there's a $40 application fee per applicant when you're ready to apply. Which of these homes would you like to see? | Hi Nathan, The home at 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available. A few options that are open right now: 2841 Morningside Court in Grand Junction, a 4 bed/2 bath at $2,300/mo; 2980 Emerald Circle in Grand Junction, a 4 bed/2.5 bath at $2,300/mo; and 363 Ember Ln in Grand Junction, a 3 bed/2 bath at $2,550/mo. On fees: the standard security deposit is one month's rent and won't exceed two months' rent, and there's a $40 application fee per applicant. As for more interior and backyard photos, that's one the property team can go over with you at your tour. Want me to get one on the books? Which of the homes above would you like to see? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: forward_to_property_manager, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same home and fee facts, but Email 1 thanks the person, answers the photo question directly and closes with one clear ask, while Email 2 is colder and punts on photos. / order B picked 2: Both list the same alternates and fees, but email 2 thanks the person, answers the photo question directly instead of deferring it, and flows naturally into asking which home they want to see.
Inquiry: <user_message> Jessalyn matched with and expressed interest in Pomona Park Townhomes | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (19 days away!) | BEDS: 2 | BUDGET: $1,800 | PETS: Renter has no pets. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Jessalyn, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available. We don't have a 2-bedroom open there right now, but there is a 3-bedroom open. 3-bedrooms here start at $2,395/mo, and the one that's open right now is $2,495/mo, running a move-in special: get 1 half month of rent free. If a 3-bedroom could work for your November 1st move-in, I'd love to get you in to see it. I have Tuesday, October 27 between 5:00 and 5:15 PM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 and 9:45 AM, does either of those work for you? | Hi Jessalyn, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available. We don't have a 2 bedroom open there right now, but there is a 3 bedroom open, running from $2,395 a month, and it comes with a move in special: get 1 half month of rent free. Would you like to come see it? I have Tuesday, October 27 between 5:00 PM and 5:15 PM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM, whichever works better for you. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 gives the actual rent of the home with the special and ties the special to the right listing, while Email 2 drops that rent and pairs the special with the wrong price. / order B picked 2: Email 2 states both the starting rent and the $2,495 rent of the open home with the special correctly placed beside it, and ties the tour offer to her November 1 move-in, while Email 1 pairs the special with the wrong rent figure. Drops: the open 3-bedroom carrying the special rents at $2,495/mo
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about 565 Redcliff Cir unit 585-201.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Tiffani, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 585-201 at Northridge Apartments (565 Redcliff Cir). It's available now, a 1 bedroom, 1 bath at $1,750 a month. You're already set for your self guided tour this Saturday, October 17 at 10:00 AM, you'll head in on your own at that time and I'll get you the lockbox code when you're ready to go in. | Hi Tiffani, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 585-201 at Northridge Apartments (565 Redcliff Cir). It's available now, a 1-bedroom, 1-bath at $1,750/mo. It's a freshly remodeled end unit with new flooring, fresh paint, new stainless steel kitchen appliances and updated bathrooms. Rent includes water, sewer and trash, plus off-street parking and one reserved carport space. You'd cover gas, electric and internet. The security deposit is $1,750, and cats and dogs are welcome. You're all set for your tour on Saturday, October 17 at 10:00 AM at 565 Redcliff Cir. It's a self-guided visit: you go in on your own at that time, and I'll send you the lockbox code whenever you ask for it. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both fabricate a booked tour time, but Email 2 also piles on unit details pulled from a different apartment and made-up remodel claims, while Email 1 sticks to the confirmed facts and stays short. / order B picked 2: Email 2 sticks to the confirmed unit facts while Email 1 pads the same message with invented remodel details and another unit's listing data presented as 585-201's.
Inquiry: <user_message> I found 486-32 1/8 32 1 8 Rd on Homes.com and would like to learn more about it. Thanks!. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Erika, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road. That home is no longer available. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. | Hi Erika, The home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly say the home is gone and close warmly, but Email 1 thanks the person first, which Email 2 skips. / order B picked 2: Both say the same correct things, but Email 2 thanks her first and reads like a warm agent while Email 1 is curt.
Inquiry: <user_message> I am interested in touring 2841 Morningside Ct.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Kyle, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court, it's available now, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. I have Tuesday, October 27 between 5:00 and 5:30 PM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 and 9:45 AM, whichever works best for you. | Hi Kyle, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court, it's available now, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. I can show you the home today between 5:15 PM and 5:30 PM, or Wednesday between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both open with the correct home details, but Email 2 misstates the tour dates ('today' and an undated Wednesday) while Email 1 gives the right days and dates. / order B picked 2: Both give the same home details and tour days, but Email 1 misdates the Tuesday slot as today while Email 2 names the correct dates.
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in Beautiful 3br Townhome w 1-car Garage (2024) | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street); it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo, and there's a move-in special on it right now: get 1 half month of rent free. There's no 1-bedroom open there right now. Cats and dogs are both welcome here, up to two pets, with a refundable pet deposit of $300 total and pet rent of $35 per pet per month, so your dog and cat would both be covered. You'd also asked about Ember Estates; that one isn't available right now. I'd love to show you Unit 405: I have Tuesday, October 27 between 5:00 and 5:15 PM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 and 9:45 AM. Which works better for you? | Hi Emma, Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is available now. It's a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with a 1-car garage and 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo, and the listing carries a Move-In Special: Get 1 HALF MONTH of Rent FREE! There's no 1-bedroom open at Pomona Park right now, and Ember Estates is no longer available. For your dog and cat, the refundable pet deposit is $300 total and pet rent is $35 per pet per month, so $70 a month for the two of them. I can show you Unit 405 today at 5:15 PM, or Wednesday anytime between 1:15 PM and 5:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect | checks failed: invented_facts; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 opens with thanks, states the home and special correctly and offers real dated tour slots, while Email 2 skips the thanks, pastes the all-caps special, and mislabels the Tuesday slot as today. / order B picked 2: Email 2 opens correctly with thanks and the home, states the special and the no-1-bedroom fact, and dates its tour offers correctly, while Email 1 misdates the Tuesday slot as today.
Inquiry: <user_message> Dear owner Leasing Agent. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Patricia, Thanks for reaching out about the studio at Camellia Apartments. It's available, a studio with 1 bath and 386 to 444 square feet, running $950 to $1,000 a month, and we're also offering one month free on 12 month new leases right now. I'd love to show you around. I have Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Thursday, October 29 between 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM, whichever works better for you? | Hi Patricia, Thanks for reaching out about Camellia Apartments. We have a studio open now, with 1 bath and 386 to 444 sq ft, at $950 to $1,000/mo. It also comes with 1 Month Free on 12-month new leases. I can show you around Wednesday between 9:00 AM and 11:45 AM, or Thursday between 1:00 PM and 4:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: invented_facts; tools: get_available_units, save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: invented_facts; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both emails give the same home, size, rent and special in a natural voice, but only Email 1 names the actual tour dates, which matters since the inquiry came in more than two weeks before the slots. / order B picked 2: Both give the same studio facts, special and slots, but Email 2 names the actual tour dates while Email 1's bare 'Wednesday/Thursday' could be mistaken for next week. Drops: tour dates (October 28 and October 29) — written on Saturday, October 10, a bare 'Wednesday' and 'Thursday' read as the coming week, not two weeks out
Inquiry: <user_message> 367 Ember Ln, awaiting your reply Western Slope Property Management Message in Zillow Rental Manager: https://www.zillow.com/rental-manager/inbox/u6gfa757ygvs?byProperty=true. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi David, Thanks for reaching out about 367 Ember Lane, it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,317 sq ft at $2,750/mo. I have Tuesday, October 27 between 5:00 PM and 5:15 PM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM. Would either of those work for a tour? | Hi David, Thanks for reaching out about 367 Ember Lane, it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,317 sq ft at $2,750/mo. I can show you the home today (Tuesday) at 5:15 PM, or Wednesday between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both open identically with the home and its facts, but Email 2 misdates the tour as today (already past) instead of October 27, while Email 1 gives the correct dates. / order B picked 2: Both open identically with the right home facts, but Email 1 mislabels the October 27 slot as 'today' at an hour that has already passed, while Email 2 gives the correct dates for both tour options.
Inquiry: <user_message> Carmen matched with and expressed interest in Pomona Park Townhomes | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (27 days away!) | BEDS: Studio | BUDGET: $900 | PETS: Renter has no pets | AMENITIES: On-Site Laundry. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Carmen, The home at 624 Eisenhauer Street, Unit 300 is no longer available. Pomona Park Townhomes doesn't have a studio open right now, but there is a 3 bedroom townhome open, with rent starting from $2,395 a month. The current listing is $2,495 a month and comes with a Move-In Special: get 1 half month of rent free. I can show you the home Tuesday, October 27 between 5:00 PM and 5:15 PM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM. Which works better for you? | Hi Carmen, Unit 300 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street) is no longer available. No studio is open there right now. The open homes are 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath townhomes from $2,395/mo, between 1,450 and 1,528 sq ft. The one at $2,495/mo comes with an in-unit washer/dryer and carries this special: "Move-In Special! Get 1 HALF MONTH of Rent FREE!" If you'd like to see one, I can show you today at 5:15 PM or Wednesday between 1:15 PM and 5:45 PM. Which works better? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, check_availability, get_property_details, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 2 gives more detail but misdates the tour as today and talks about 'the open homes' as a set, while Email 1 names one home with correct rent, special and dates. / order B picked 2: Email 2 is cleaner: one home, plain dates, correct special beside the rent, while Email 1 misdates the tour as 'today' and drifts toward describing multiple units, outweighing its extra details.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello I’m interested in the house however have a few questions. First is there other pictures of the inside of the house or back yard. Also is there any security deposit or any other fees to rent the property prior to moving in.. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-sonnet-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Nathan, Thanks for reaching out. The home at 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available. A few other homes we have open right now are 2841 Morningside Court in Grand Junction, 81503, a 4 bedroom, 2 bath at $2,300/mo, 2980 Emerald Circle in Grand Junction, 81504, a 4 bedroom, 2.5 bath also at $2,300/mo, and 363 Ember Ln in Grand Junction, 81501, a 3 bedroom, 2 bath at $2,550/mo. I don't have extra interior or backyard photos to send over, but once you pick a home I'm happy to get a tour set up so you can see it in person. On fees, the standard security deposit is typically one month's rent and never more than two months, with the exact amount confirmed per home, and there's a $40 application fee per applicant when you're ready to apply. Which of these homes would you like to see? | Hi Nathan, Thanks for reaching out about 2978 Emerald Circle. It's no longer available, but a few other homes are open: 2841 Morningside Court, a 4 bed, 2 bath at $2,300/mo; 2980 Emerald Circle, a 4 bed, 2.5 bath at $2,300/mo; and 363 Ember Ln, a 3 bed, 2 bath at $2,550/mo. On fees, the application fee is $40 per applicant. The security deposit is refundable and set per home, and it won't exceed two months of rent. Renter's insurance is also required before move-in. Which of those homes would you like to see? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly report the home is gone and offer the three alternatives with the same fee details, but only Email 1 answers the photo question, while Email 2 skips it entirely. / order B picked 2: Email 2 answers both of Nathan's questions while Email 1 skips the photo question entirely; both list the alternates as instructed and share equally unsourced fee details. Drops: answer to the photo question (no extra interior/backyard photos available, offer to see in person)
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'd like more information about NOW PRE-LEASING ! 1.5 Months FREE ! Brand-New Duplex Homes ! Private Garages & Yards.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Mary Ann, We don't have a 2 bedroom open right now at Ember Estates, 374 Ember Lane, but we do have a 3 bedroom home open now, running $2,550 to $2,795 a month. It comes with our Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year (you would just cover electricity and internet), running through October 31 or while supplies last. I have Tuesday, October 27 between 5:00 PM and 5:15 PM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM to show you around. Which works better for you? | Hi Mary Ann, There isn't a 2-bedroom open at Ember Estates right now, but the brand-new 3-bedroom, 2-bath duplex homes are. They're 1,289 sq ft at $2,550 or $2,795 a month, each with an attached garage and a private fenced backyard. Both carry the Grand Opening Special: 6 weeks free rent, plus water, sewer and trash included for your first year. You'd cover electricity and internet, and the special runs until Oct 31 or while supplies last. I can show you around today at 5:15 PM, or tomorrow, Wednesday, between 1:00 PM and 5:45 PM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 2 is warmer and answers more of the listing's points, but it invents a square footage, counts the open homes with 'Both', and dates the tour as 'today' against the stated September 29 date, while Email 1 stays accurate on rent, special and home. / order B picked 2: Email 1 reads warmer and fuller but invents a square footage contradicted by its own tool data and slips in a two-home count, while Email 2's facts all hold up with only a minor tour-minute fudge. Drops: street address 374 Ember Lane; the tour dates (October 27 / October 28) instead of today/tomorrow, which conflicts with the stated September 29 date
Inquiry: <user_message> I found 486-32 1/8 32 1 8 Rd on Homes.com and would like to learn more about it. Thanks!. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Erika, Thanks for reaching out about 486 32 1/8 Road. That home is no longer available. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. | Hi Erika, The home at 486 32 1/8 Road is no longer available. Happy to answer anything else about renting with us. |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly say the home is gone and close warmly, but Email 1 thanks the person first, which reads more like a capable leasing agent. / order B picked 2: Both correctly say the home is gone and close warmly without promising follow-up, but Email 2 thanks Erika for reaching out, which Email 1 omits.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello, I'm interested in a studio apartment (unit 206/606) at Camellia Apartments and am looking to move in around October 14. Do you offer 6-month lease options? I'd also like to know what additional monthly fees are charged besides the base rent, such as utilities, parking, trash, or other community fees. Thank you!. Pet Description: no pets. Pet Type: None. Lease Length Months: 1. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Queen, Yes, Camellia offers both 6-month and 12-month lease terms at the same rental rate, so a 6-month lease works just fine for Unit 206 (the studio, 386 sq ft, $1,000/mo, available now). Beyond rent, water, sewer, trash and heat are billed monthly through our third-party biller, Conservice, based on usage (studio residents have generally seen it run about $40 to $50 a month, though it varies). Electric is your own account with Xcel Energy and internet is set up on your own as well. Parking is optional, $80/mo for a surface spot or $95/mo for a garage spot (on-site parking is full right now, so new residents join a waitlist, and there's overflow parking next door for $100/mo arranged through our office), and there's no admin fee here. Since you mentioned no pets, there's nothing else to add on that front. Looking forward to seeing you for your tour this Tuesday, October 13 at 2:30 PM! | I wrote Queen's first reply, which is ready to send above. One thing doesn't add up. The prompt says today is October 27, but the system context says October 11. I went with October 11, so I treated her October 13 tour as still ahead and confirmed it instead of offering the October 28 and 29 slots. If today is really the 27th, that tour has already passed and the reply needs new tour times. What the email covers: - **Unit 206:** a studio with 1 bath, 386 sq ft, $1,000/mo, available now. I also mentioned the 1 month free special on 12-month new leases. - **6-month lease:** yes, at the same rent as a 12-month lease. - **1-month lease:** her inquiry form listed a 1-month lease length, and nothing on file covers that. I sent the question to the property team and told her I'd check and get back to her. - **Fees:** - Water, sewer, trash and heat come through Conservice. They're usage-based, and studio residents have paid around $40 to $50 a month. - Electric (Xcel Energy) and internet are her own accounts. - There's no admin fee. - Parking is $80 surface or $95 garage. It's full with a waitlist, and the nail salon next door rents spots for $100 a month. **Unit 606** didn't show up in the available studios, so I left it out. I didn't say it's unavailable, because there's no result for it either way. The application on file shows as sent on October 13, which is after October 11. She didn't ask about applying, so I didn't mention it. I saved her as a lead: studio, unit 206, moving in around October 14, no pets. |
| checks failed: none; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, update_prospect, forward_to_property_manager, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 is a real, warm reply that answers the lease and fee questions, while Email 2 is an unsendable internal summary that lists units and says nothing to the person. / order B picked 2: Email 2 is an actual warm, sendable reply that answers the lease and fee questions and names one home, while Email 1 is operator-facing notes rather than a message to the prospect.
Inquiry: <user_message> hi, would you be available tomorrow evening for a tour. I am interested in:363 Ember Ln. Pet Description: A pet. Pet Type: Other. Lease Length Months: 18. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Thanks for letting me know you're interested in 363 Ember Ln. The good news on lease length: this home is currently offering longer leases of 14 to 18 months as a promotion, so an 18 month term works perfectly here. On the pet, since it's listed as "Other," I'd love to know exactly what kind of pet it is to make sure it fits our policy. In general we welcome cats and dogs, with a refundable pet deposit of $300 total and pet rent of $35 per pet per month. For touring, I don't have anything open tomorrow evening for this home, but the earliest opening I have is Wednesday, October 28, anytime between 1:00 PM and 5:45 PM. Would 5:00 PM or 5:30 PM work, or is there another time in that window you'd prefer? | |
| checks failed: none; tools: check_availability, update_prospect | checks failed: no_empty_reply; tools: update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 at least answers the tour request with sourced October 28 windows, while Email 2 sends nothing, though Email 1 is weakened by made-up pet and lease figures and omits the rent and special. / order B picked 2: Email 1 is a non-reply, so Email 2 wins by default even though it fabricates fee and lease policies and omits the home's rent, size and special. Drops: 363 Ember Ln is open now; tour windows on Wednesday, October 28; lease-length and pet answers
Inquiry: <user_message> I am interested in touring 2841 Morningside Ct.. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Kyle, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court, it's available now, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. I have Tuesday, October 27 between 5:00 and 5:30 PM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 and 9:45 AM, whichever works best for you. | Hi Kyle, Thanks for reaching out about 2841 Morningside Court. It's open and ready to tour, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath with 1,518 sq ft at $2,300/mo. I can show you around today between 5:15 PM and 5:30 PM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, check_availability, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both give the same home facts, but Email 2 mislabels the October 27 tour window as today, while Email 1's dates are correct. / order B picked 2: Email 2 dates the Tuesday tour correctly while Email 1 misleads Kyle into thinking the slot is this evening; Email 2's 15-minute slip on the same day is a smaller fault.
Inquiry: <user_message> Emma matched with and expressed interest in Beautiful 3br Townhome w 1-car Garage (2024) | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (9 days away!) | BEDS: 1 | BUDGET: $1,500 | PETS: Renter has a Dog, Cat. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street); it's available now, a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo, and there's a move-in special on it right now: get 1 half month of rent free. There's no 1-bedroom open there right now. Cats and dogs are both welcome here, up to two pets, with a refundable pet deposit of $300 total and pet rent of $35 per pet per month, so your dog and cat would both be covered. You'd also asked about Ember Estates; that one isn't available right now. I'd love to show you Unit 405: I have Tuesday, October 27 between 5:00 and 5:15 PM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 and 9:45 AM. Which works better for you? | Hi Emma, Thanks for reaching out about Unit 405 at Pomona Park Townhomes (624 Eisenhauer Street). It's available now: a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath with 1,528 sq ft at $2,495/mo, and its listing has a move-in special of a half month of rent free. There's no 1-bedroom open there right now. Your dog and cat are both welcome. The refundable pet deposit is $300 total, and pet rent is $35 per pet per month. Ember Estates, the other place you looked at, is no longer available. I can show you around Unit 405 today at 5:15 PM or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM. Which works better for you? |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, check_availability, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both open correctly, cover pets, and dismiss Ember Estates, but Email 2 misdates its first tour slot as today while Email 1's slip is only an extra pet-limit claim. / order B picked 2: Both emails lead correctly with Unit 405, its rent and special, and the no-1-bedroom note, but Email 1 misdates the Tuesday tour as today while Email 2 gives the right day with only a minor minutes stretch.
Inquiry: <user_message> Carmen matched with and expressed interest in Pomona Park Townhomes | MOVE-IN: 11/01/2026 (27 days away!) | BEDS: Studio | BUDGET: $900 | PETS: Renter has no pets | AMENITIES: On-Site Laundry. </user_message>
| Production reference | claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| Hi Carmen, The home at 624 Eisenhauer Street, Unit 300 is no longer available. Pomona Park Townhomes doesn't have a studio open right now, but there is a 3 bedroom townhome open, with rent starting from $2,395 a month. The current listing is $2,495 a month and comes with a Move-In Special: get 1 half month of rent free. I can show you the home Tuesday, October 27 between 5:00 PM and 5:15 PM, or Wednesday, October 28 between 9:00 AM and 9:45 AM. Which works better for you? | I sent Carmen her first email. It says Unit 300 is no longer available and no studio is open at Pomona Park Townhomes right now. - **What's open:** I told her about the 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath townhomes: 1,450 to 1,528 sq ft, at $2,395 to $2,495 a month. These are well above the $900 budget on her card. Per the rules, I gave the rent as it is and didn't compare it to her budget. - **Special:** The $2,495 home has a move-in special of half a month's rent free, so I put that next to its rent. The listing's full terms say the 12-month lease has to be signed by October 31, 2026. I only used the short version from the listing's special line, so that deadline isn't in the email. - **Laundry:** Her card asked for on-site laundry. The property has no amenities on file, so I used the $2,495 home's own listing, which includes an in-unit washer and dryer. - **Tour times:** I offered today at 5:15 PM or Wednesday, October 28, anytime between 1:15 PM and 5:45 PM. Nothing is booked yet. **The date doesn't match.** The message from the property says it's Sunday, October 4. The rest of the setup and the availability check both say today is Tuesday, October 27. I went with the 27th, but if the 4th is right, "today at 5:15 PM" is the wrong day. That would also leave her only four days to sign if she wants the special. I saved her as a lead with her email address, not as a phone number, because no phone number is on file. Her saved details are a studio, move-in 11/01/2026, a $900 budget, no pets and on-site laundry. Nothing went to the property team, since everything she asked was answered. |
| checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, check_availability, get_amenities, update_prospect, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Email 1 is a real, mostly correct message to Carmen that names the home, states the rent and special, and offers tour times, while Email 2 is a summary written to the operator that could never be sent. / order B picked 2: Email 2 is an actual warm, concise email with the key facts, while Email 1 is an unsendable internal summary with a wrong tour date.
Inquiry: <user_message> Hello I’m interested in the house however have a few questions. First is there other pictures of the inside of the house or back yard. Also is there any security deposit or any other fees to rent the property prior to moving in.. Reason For Moving: None. </user_message>
| Production reference (held) | claude-opus-5-5 (held) |
|---|---|
| Hi Nathan, Thanks for reaching out. The home at 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available. A few other homes we have open right now are 2841 Morningside Court in Grand Junction, 81503, a 4 bedroom, 2 bath at $2,300/mo, 2980 Emerald Circle in Grand Junction, 81504, a 4 bedroom, 2.5 bath also at $2,300/mo, and 363 Ember Ln in Grand Junction, 81501, a 3 bedroom, 2 bath at $2,550/mo. I don't have extra interior or backyard photos to send over, but once you pick a home I'm happy to get a tour set up so you can see it in person. On fees, the standard security deposit is typically one month's rent and never more than two months, with the exact amount confirmed per home, and there's a $40 application fee per applicant when you're ready to apply. Which of these homes would you like to see? | Hi Nathan, Thanks for reaching out. The home at 2978 Emerald Circle is no longer available, but these homes are open: 2980 Emerald Circle, a 4-bedroom, 2.5-bath at $2,300/mo; 2841 Morningside Court, a 4-bedroom, 2-bath at $2,300/mo; and 363 Ember Ln, a 3-bedroom, 2-bath at $2,550/mo. The standard security deposit is one month's rent. It's paid along with the first month's rent before move-in. The application fee is $40 per applicant, and you'll need renter's insurance with at least $100,000 in liability coverage before you move in. Which of these homes would you like to see? |
| checks failed: none; tools: declare_deferred_asks | checks failed: none; tools: save_prospect, get_available_units, declare_deferred_asks |
Judge (claude-fable-5-1, both orders): order A picked 1: Both correctly report 2978 is gone and name the three alternatives as instructed, but Email 1 answers both of Nathan's questions while Email 2 ignores the photo question and adds more made-up policy specifics. / order B picked 2: Email 2 answers both questions (photos and fees) with hedged rather than invented-as-fact figures, while Email 1 skips the photo question and asserts unsourced deposit and insurance policies. Drops: answer to whether more interior/backyard photos exist (none to send, offer to tour instead)
| Date | What changed | Set | Surface | Headline number | Never-do | Judge W / T / L | Fede graded | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-03 | Staff desk turn (a teammate writing to Clara): Opus 5.5 against Sonnet 5.5 model | Staff-reaction regression harness (43 fixtures) pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-11-03 | staff text | Opus 5.5 vs Sonnet 5.5 on the staff desk: Fixtures 43 v 43 passes (2 runs each), 0 regressions the model can cause; judge on the 18 desk fixtures: Sonnet 13 / tie 16 / Opus 7, a tie once the two missing-information rows are taken out | a renter was texted on a PropFlow operator's word (syn-10) in all 4 runs, on the prospect path, not the desk: a code cause (any @propflowai.co address counts as staff). No forbidden tool ran on either arm. | All 41 runnable fixtures, both runs: Sonnet 15 / tie 54 / Opus 11. Desk fixtures only: Sonnet 13 / tie 16 / Opus 7. | – | complete | detail |
| 2026-11-02 | Fede's Wrong cards are now a frozen check; prospect replies have an upgrade surface measurement | Clara Bench frozen sets v1 (tenant text) and v2 (prospect reply turn) v1 + v2 | tenant text, prospect later email, prospect text | Production against itself: Tenant text (Sonnet): FAIL, 6 of 9 runnable Wrong cards still reproduce (reference 5 of 9). Prospect reply (Opus): PASS, judge 6 W / 12 T / 12 L | tenant: told the team 10 / 7; prospect reply: 1 invented fact, 1 invented tour time, 1 told the team, on both runs | Tenant run 2 9 W / 12 T / 9 L; prospect reply run 2 6 W / 12 T / 12 L | – | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-30 | Model upgrade bench: production claude-sonnet-5 against itself (prospect first email, full) measurement | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): PASS; judge vs production 19 W / 18 T / 14 L; held 13 vs 15 | this arm: dash 2, tour time 1, invented 0; new vs reference 2 | 19 / 18 / 14 | 0 of 4 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-30 | Model upgrade bench: production claude-sonnet-5 against itself (prospect first email, full) measurement | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): PASS; judge vs production 7 W / 30 T / 14 L; held 16 vs 13 | this arm: dash 4, tour time 1, invented 0; new vs reference 3 | 7 / 30 / 14 | 0 of 4 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-30 | Model upgrade bench: production claude-sonnet-5 against itself (prospect first email, full) measurement | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): PASS; judge vs production 16 W / 25 T / 10 L; held 14 vs 14 | this arm: dash 2, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 2 | 16 / 25 / 10 | 0 of 4 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-30 | Model upgrade bench: production claude-sonnet-5 against itself (prospect first email, full) measurement | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): PASS; judge vs production 13 W / 28 T / 10 L; held 15 vs 14 | this arm: dash 3, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 3 | 13 / 28 / 10 | 0 of 4 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-30 | Model upgrade bench: production claude-sonnet-5 against itself (prospect first email, full) measurement | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): FAIL; judge vs production 10 W / 27 T / 14 L; held 12 vs 15 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 1 | 10 / 27 / 14 | 0 of 4 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-30 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5 on today's prompt (prospect first email, full) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): PASS; judge vs production 33 W / 14 T / 4 L; held 15 vs 15 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 0 | 33 / 14 / 4 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-30 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5 on today's prompt (prospect first email, full) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): PASS; judge vs production 29 W / 17 T / 5 L; held 14 vs 13 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 0 | 29 / 17 / 5 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-30 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5 on today's prompt (prospect first email, full) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): FAIL; judge vs production 30 W / 20 T / 1 L; held 13 vs 14 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 1 | 30 / 20 / 1 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-30 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5 on today's prompt (prospect first email, full) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): PASS; judge vs production 34 W / 14 T / 3 L; held 12 vs 14 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 0 | 34 / 14 / 3 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-30 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5 on today's prompt (prospect first email, full) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): PASS; judge vs production 27 W / 19 T / 5 L; held 12 vs 15 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 0 | 27 / 19 / 5 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-30 | Prompt cut bench: first-email prompt cut by deletion on claude-opus-5-5 (prospect first email, full) prompt | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): PASS; judge vs production 28 W / 21 T / 2 L; held 12 vs 15 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 0 | 28 / 21 / 2 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-29 | Model upgrade bench: production claude-sonnet-5 against itself (prospect first email, full) measurement | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): FAIL; judge vs production 12 W / 29 T / 10 L; held 12 vs 14 | this arm: dash 2, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 2 | 12 / 29 / 10 | 0 of 4 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-29 | Model upgrade bench: production claude-sonnet-5 against itself (prospect first email, full) measurement | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): PASS; judge vs production 6 W / 25 T / 20 L; held 15 vs 13 | this arm: dash 3, tour time 1, invented 1; new vs reference 6 | 6 / 25 / 20 | 0 of 4 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-29 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5 on today's prompt (prospect first email, full) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): FAIL; judge vs production 24 W / 22 T / 5 L; held 13 vs 14 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 1, invented 0; new vs reference 3 | 24 / 22 / 5 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-29 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5 on today's prompt (prospect first email, full) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): FAIL; judge vs production 25 W / 16 T / 10 L; held 15 vs 13 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 1, invented 0; new vs reference 2 | 25 / 16 / 10 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-29 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5-goal on today's prompt (prospect first email, full) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (full, 51 items): FAIL; judge vs production 24 W / 17 T / 10 L; held 13 vs 13 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 1, invented 0; new vs reference 3 | 24 / 17 / 10 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-28 | Model upgrade bench: claude-sonnet-5-5 on today's prompt (prospect first email, smoke) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (smoke, 30 items): FAIL; judge vs production 15 W / 5 T / 10 L; held 13 vs 10 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 7; new vs reference 7 | 15 / 5 / 10 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-28 | Model upgrade bench: production claude-sonnet-5 against itself (prospect first email, smoke) measurement | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (smoke, 30 items): PASS; judge vs production 6 W / 17 T / 7 L; held 10 vs 10 | this arm: dash 3, tour time 0, invented 3; new vs reference 5 | 6 / 17 / 7 | 0 of 4 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-28 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5 on today's prompt after the prompt cleanup (prospect first email, smoke) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (smoke, 30 items): FAIL; judge vs production 11 W / 10 T / 9 L; held 9 vs 9 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 1; new vs reference 2 (the invented one is a false flag, see caveats) | 11 / 10 / 9 | 0 of 11 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-28 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5 on today's prompt after the open-home line fixes (#23112, #23161) (prospect first email, smoke) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (smoke, 30 items): PASS; judge vs production 21 W / 7 T / 2 L; held 9 vs 10 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 0 | 21 / 7 / 2 | 0 of 30 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-28 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5 on today's prompt after the first-email rule fixes (#23123) (prospect first email, smoke) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (smoke, 30 items): PASS; judge vs production 12 W / 6 T / 12 L; held 8 vs 10 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 0 | 12 / 6 / 12 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-28 | Goal block bench: claude-opus-5-5 with a short goal placed first in the first-email prompt (prospect first email, smoke) prompt | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Goal block vs the same prompt without it (smoke, 30 items): TOO CLOSE, run the full tier: vs no-goal Opus 7 W / 18 T / 5 L; held 7 vs 9; 1 new never-do (an empty email) | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 0; new vs reference 1 | 18 / 9 / 3 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-28 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5 on today's prompt (prospect first email, smoke) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (smoke, 30 items): FAIL; judge vs production 13 W / 12 T / 5 L; held 11 vs 10 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 1; new vs reference 2 | 13 / 12 / 5 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-27 | Model upgrade bench: claude-sonnet-5-5 on today's prompt (prospect first email, smoke) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (smoke, 30 items): FAIL; judge vs production 8 W / 6 T / 16 L; held 7 vs 11 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 8; new vs reference 3 | 8 / 6 / 16 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-27 | Model upgrade bench: production claude-sonnet-5 against itself (prospect first email, smoke) measurement | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (smoke, 30 items): PASS; judge vs production 8 W / 15 T / 7 L; held 9 vs 11 | this arm: dash 1, tour time 0, invented 5; new vs reference 2 | 8 / 15 / 7 | 0 of 4 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-27 | Model upgrade bench: claude-opus-5-5 on today's prompt (prospect first email, smoke) model | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Against the exit bar (smoke, 30 items): FAIL; judge vs production 8 W / 5 T / 17 L; held 10 vs 11 | this arm: dash 0, tour time 0, invented 7; new vs reference 4 | 8 / 5 / 17 | 0 of 8 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-27 | Step 1: today's leasing first-email prompt split into four pieces, on production's own model refactor | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email | Does splitting today's leasing prompt into pieces change what Clara writes?: No beyond noise: the split matches production run A on 20 of 51 emails, where production matches itself on 16 to 25 of 51; every count sits inside the three production runs' spread (one count, save prospect 30 vs 25, is one over the strict two-run bar). | Invented facts 9 / 8 / 8 production, 9 split; told the team 0 / 1 / 1 production, 0 split; em dash 4 / 2 / 3 production, 5 split | Split vs A: 13 W / 27 T / 11 L; noise B vs A: 12 / 24 / 15; noise C vs A: 12 / 25 / 14 | – | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-26 | Slice H: full context versus restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt) prompt | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | prospect first email, tenant text, decide-to-speak, Spanish | Does the full facts block make Clara better? (first email; tenant texts, noise first): First email, production → full context: held 21 → 16 of 51, invented facts 9 → 4, helpful 51 of 51 → 47 of 50. Tenant other text, restrictive → full context: noise 44 → 53 of 99 (production 84), helpful 30 of 56 (54%) → 37 of 66 (56%) (production 76 of 122, 62%) | First email: production held 21 of 51, invented 9, broken promises 0, helpful 51 of 51; restrictive held 19 of 51, invented 15, broken promises 0, helpful 50 of 51; full context held 16 of 51, invented 4, broken promises 0, helpful 47 of 50; tenant other text: noise production 84 / restrictive 44 / full 53 of 99, told the team 46 / 26 / 29, invented 8 / 7 / 8 | no judge | – | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-25 | Baseline v1 (production, Oct 25) measurement | Clara Bench frozen set v1 v1 | tenant text, decide-to-speak, prospect first email, Spanish | Noise rate: production replied where the office answered within 48 h (primary score, tenant other text, full): 82 of 96 (85%); helpful rate 72 of 119 replies (61%) | Tenant other full: 82 replies where the office answered, 47 "told the team" replies, 5 invented facts (pattern check); prospect full: 10 invented (pattern check), 1 "told the team" | Tenant repair smoke 6 / 1 / 4 (Clara better / same / office better, n=11), controls 5 of 6. Tenant other text not valid: controls failed. | – | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-24 | Benchmark D3: office-conversation rule replaces the 24 h teammate gate prompt | Tenant texts: inbox copy, Situs history, Spanish F set, extra Spanish Situs pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-24 | tenant text, decide-to-speak, Spanish | Opus 5.5, agreement with Fede's 23 graded tenant examples: 22 of 23 (D2: 20; Sonnet 20); 0 replies on a staff-run thread, 0 invented, 0 "check with team", 0 promises; routine answered recent 10 → 12 of 50 | 0 · 0 · 0 on every sent reply; Opus 0 replies on a staff-run thread (Fable check) on all four sets; Sonnet 2 (one tenant's key return, counted in two sets) | Opus recent 4 / 2 / 0 (n=6), new rubric; Sonnet recent 2 / 1 / 3 (n=6) | 24 of 24 agree 4 of 5 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-23 | Benchmark G2: the same 261 tenant repair episodes under the two-outcome rules prompt | Tenant repair episodes: WS recent, Situs recent, Situs history pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23 | tenant text, Spanish | Opus 5.5, 261 repair episodes, two outcomes: filed when the office filed 8 of 42 (19%); same issue, location, urgency 8 of 8; invented facts 1 of 261; stayed out of staff-run threads 140 of 141 | Invented facts 1 of 261 episodes (Opus), 5 (Sonnet); 0 "check with the team"; 0 texts quoting an internal id; chimed in on staff-run threads 1 of 141 (Opus), 11 (Sonnet) | Judge overall mean 4.56 Opus, 4.38 Sonnet | – | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-23 | Benchmark G: whole tenant repair episodes with Clara's tools (first run) measurement | Tenant repair episodes: WS recent, Situs recent, Situs history pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23 | tenant text, Spanish | Opus 5.5, 261 repair episodes: filed when the office filed 11 of 42 (26%); same issue 10 of 11, location 11 of 11, urgency 10 of 11; 0 duplicates of 32 filings; invented facts 13 of 261 | Invented facts 13 of 261 episodes (Opus), 16 (Sonnet); 0 "check with the team"; 1 promise outside tools each | Judge overall mean 3.49 Opus, 3.47 Sonnet | – | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-23 | Benchmark F: Spanish model | Every Spanish text and card in the corpus pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23 | Spanish, tenant text, prospect first email | Opus 5.5, 365 Spanish tenant texts: 40 of 40 replies in Spanish, naturalness 4.53 of 5, judge 26 / 1 / 2 vs staff | 0 · 0 · 0; 28 of 78 replies on a teammate's thread (both arms) | Opus 26 / 1 / 2, Sonnet 22 / 1 / 4 | 0 of 4 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-23 | Benchmark D2: tenant texts redone on complete context, two outcomes, real reply pairing prompt | Tenant texts: inbox copy, Situs history, Spanish F set, extra Spanish Situs pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23 | tenant text, decide-to-speak, Spanish | Opus 5.5, 383 recent texts, after the full pipeline: 14 replies (was 23); 0 on a teammate's thread (was 10); 0 invented, 0 "check with team", 0 promises; routine texts answered 10 of 50 (was 18) | 0 · 0 · 0 on every sent reply; 0 replies on a thread a teammate wrote on in 24 h (was 10 to 13 per arm) | Opus recent 6 / 0 / 0 (n=6), new rubric 5 / 0 / 1 | 24 of 24 agree 4 of 5 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-23 | Benchmark D: one strong model, lean prompt, all context (tenant texts) refactor | Tenant texts: inbox copy + Situs history pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23 | tenant text, decide-to-speak | Opus 5.5 full context, 383 recent texts: silent 211 / team item 149 / reply 23; 0 invented, 0 "check with team", 0 promises; 10 replies on a teammate's thread | 0 · 0 · 0 on 111 replies; 10 of Opus's 23 recent replies on a teammate's thread | Opus full context 24 / 5 / 2 across both sets | 24 of 24 agree 4 of 5 | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-23 | Benchmark C: when to reply refactor | Western Slope + Situs AppFolio inbox copy, Sep 30 to Oct 23 pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23 | decide-to-speak | Leaks (replies to a non-prospect): 0 for every code rule; 1 for both models (the same Situs "Yes") | leaks 0 code / 1 per model; teammate thread 8 Sonnet, 5 Opus | no judge | – | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-23 | Benchmark B: prompt size, cache and cost per turn prompt | Real production traces, Sep 25 to Oct 23 pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23 | prospect first email, prospect later email, prospect text, tenant text, staff text, handyman text | First email, $ / turn on Sonnet 5: today $0.48 (106.2k tokens) vs thin $0.032 (7.2k tokens) | not graded (cost run) | no judge | – | complete | detail |
| 2026-10-23 | Benchmark A: today's first-reply prompt vs the thin prompt prompt | Whole guest-card corpus + production first emails pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23 | prospect first email | Clean, 72 production first emails: thin 81% (Opus) / 79% (Sonnet) vs today's draft 63%, sent 52% | over-share 0% thin vs 14% today's draft, 23% sent | no judge | 7 of 12 | complete | detail |
What changed: Candidate: move the staff leasing desk turn (Clara answering someone on the customer's own team, by text or email) from claude-sonnet-5-5 to claude-opus-5-5. Nothing else changed between the arms.. Tier: exploratory (Two full passes per arm on the same app code (d3f34befc2), arms run side by side. Served model checked on every one of 810 calls (requested = served).) Status: complete.
Set: Staff-reaction regression harness (43 fixtures), pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-11-03. 43 fixtures · 18 fixtures that reach the staff desk turn · 2 skipped (call channel, voice minutes rationed). No bench surface exists for the staff turn, so this is the 43-fixture harness on the fede/staff-reaction-regression-harness branch: real producers send the notice, the staff reaction enters through the real email or text door, local DynamoDB, wire cut at the socket. 18 of 41 runnable fixtures reach the staff desk turn; the rest stop at the reader, run another path, or run no model.
| Set | Arm | Fixtures PASS, run 1 / run 2 | Desk fixtures PASS, run 1 / run 2 | Judge on desk fixtures, both runs: this arm better / tie / other better | Consistent in both runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staff-reaction harness | Sonnet 5.5 (production) baseline claude-sonnet-5-5 | 22 / 21 | 6 / 4 | reference | reference |
| Staff-reaction harness | Opus 5.5 (candidate) claude-opus-5-5 | 21 / 22 | 5 / 6 | 7 / 16 / 13 | Opus 1, Sonnet 4 (2 of the 4 are missing-information rows, 2 are style) |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | blank: not a code check in this harness; the judge reads it |
| "Check with the team" | blank: not a code check in this harness |
| Promise outside tools | blank: the harness checks forbidden tools instead; none ran |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this harness |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: not a code check in this harness |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | Sonnet 5.5: 2 Opus 5.5: 2 |
claude-fable-5-1, vs Sonnet 5.5 on the same fixture, same pass (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree. Two fixtures (syn-09, syn-15) ran the same model in both arms and the judge still picked a side 3 of 4 times, so a single-run win is noise.): All 41 runnable fixtures, both runs: Sonnet 15 / tie 54 / Opus 11. Desk fixtures only: Sonnet 13 / tie 16 / Opus 7.. Per arm in the table above.
no review set written for this run
all red 3 of 3 caught. Judge: planted filler ('Thanks, noted!') against the real reply on 3 fixtures, both orders: the real reply won 3 of 3. Served model checked on all 810 calls. The harness's own controls (replied-only grader, wrong expectation, fixture drift, name leak) are in results/before-2026-11-03.md on the harness branch.
Ran on the Claude subscription. Not measured separately; both arms ran side by side, about 14 minutes a pass.
scripts/coworker-harness/staff-reaction-regression/run.ts (branch fede/staff-reaction-regression-harness) x2 per arm, STAFF_DESK_DRAFTING_MODEL edited locally for the Opus arm; blind pairwise Fable 5.1 judge on the subscriptionnever_do.invented_facts: not a code check in this harness; the judge reads itnever_do.check_with_team: not a code check in this harnessnever_do.promise_outside_tools: the harness checks forbidden tools instead; none rannever_do.over_share: not a code check in this harnessnever_do.teammate_thread: not a code check in this harnesscost.total_list_usd: ran on the subscription; not pricedcost.per_item: ran on the subscription; not pricedhuman_verdicts: no review set written for this runlinks.review_set: no review set written for this runlinks.results_md: results in the swap PR bodyWhat changed: No change to Clara. The bench now replays every Fede card it can rebuild on every arm and fails an arm while a Wrong card reproduces (clara-benchmark #65); bench upgrade gains the prospect_reply surface on a new frozen set v2 of 53 recorded turns (clara-benchmark #66). Two production-only runs prove both.. Tier: smoke (Both runs are the smoke tier (30 items each). Production against itself only: these runs set the floor, they do not test a candidate.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen sets v1 (tenant text) and v2 (prospect reply turn), v1 + v2. 30 tenant text (smoke) · 30 prospect reply turn (smoke) · 18 Fede's rated cards (17 Wrong, 1 Fine). v2 is new: 53 recorded turns where a renter wrote back (Western Slope 42, Situs Group 11, Oct 24 to 30), each replayed on the prompt production recorded for it. It judges model swaps only, never prompt changes.
| Set | Arm | Items run | Bar | Fede's Wrong cards reproduce | Never-do fails | Judge vs reference: run 2 better / tie / reference better |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenant other text v1, smoke | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | reference | 5 of 9 (13, 14, 26, 38, 44) | told the team 10, em dash 2 | n/a |
| Tenant other text v1, smoke | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | FAIL (fede_cards only) | 6 of 9 (10, 13, 14, 26, 38, 44) | told the team 7, em dash 2 | 9 / 12 / 9 |
| Prospect reply turn v2, smoke | Production reference baseline claude-opus-5-5 | 30 of 30 | reference | none runnable (cards 31, 41) | invented facts 1, invented tour time 1, told the team 1 | n/a |
| Prospect reply turn v2, smoke | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-opus-5-5 | 30 of 30 | PASS | none runnable (cards 31, 41) | invented facts 1, invented tour time 1, told the team 1 (0 new) | 6 / 12 / 12 |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Tenant reference: 0 Tenant run 2: 0 Prospect reply reference: 1 Prospect reply run 2: 1 |
| "Check with the team" | Tenant reference: 10 Tenant run 2: 7 Prospect reply reference: 1 Prospect reply run 2: 1 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: the tenant noise line carries it; not split out here |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: not measured on these sets |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree. Fede cards: a code check per card plus a 3-vote Fable card judge where words alone cannot tell.): Tenant run 2 9 W / 12 T / 9 L; prospect reply run 2 6 W / 12 T / 12 L. Per arm in the table above.
no review set written for these floor runs
all red 36 of 36 caught. Fede cards: every stored Wrong output (plus card 1's two synthetic twins and the Fine card) fed back through the checks, 18 of 18 as planted. Each run's own controls 18 of 18 (code checks, served model, write blocker, judge).
Ran on the Claude subscription.
clara-benchmark: bench upgrade --surface tenant_text --model claude-sonnet-5 --tier smoke; bench upgrade --surface prospect_reply --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier smoke; bench fede-cards controlnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this benchnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores itnever_do.teammate_thread: the tenant noise line carries it; not split out herenever_do.leaks: not measured on these setscost.total_list_usd: two runs on different models; not summed herehuman_verdicts: no review set written for these floor runslinks.review_set: no review set written for these floor runslinks.results_md: results live in the two PR bodies (clara-benchmark #65, #66)verdict: a floor measurement, not a candidatedecision: nothing for Fede to decideWhat changed: No change: production's claude-sonnet-5 run a second time in the same window, the noise floor every candidate is held to, and the check that production still reproduces baseline v1. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 33 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | Never-do fails: no tour times offered / deflected to the team with the answer on file | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 15 of 51 | 2 / 0 / 0 / 1 | 1 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,553,890 (4,432,394) / 181,902 ($22.95) | 40 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 13 of 51 | 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | no_invented_tour_time 1, no_em_dash 1 | 19 / 18 / 14 | 21 of 51 | 12 of 51 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,911,306 (9,716,279) / 175,785 ($4.19) | 38 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 1 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 19 / 18 / 14. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 4 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 4 rows have a judge call.
all red 23 of 23 caught. Code checks 18 of 18 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 9 of 9 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better; deflection: pet question put off, pet policy on file; deflection: a question the records do not answer).
About $4.19 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.082. Latency: Production reference 40 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 38 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-sonnet-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-30-post-23764-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: No change: production's claude-sonnet-5 run a second time in the same window, the noise floor every candidate is held to, and the check that production still reproduces baseline v1. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 33 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | Never-do fails: no tour times offered / deflected to the team with the answer on file | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 13 of 51 | 1 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,194,653 (9,035,726) / 183,484 ($4.05) | 36 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 16 of 51 | 4 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | no_em_dash 3 | 7 / 30 / 14 | 31 of 51 | 10 of 51 | 2 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 10,624,080 (10,394,926) / 186,243 ($4.49) | 41 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 7 / 30 / 14. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 4 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 4 rows have a judge call.
all red 23 of 23 caught. Code checks 18 of 18 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 9 of 9 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better; deflection: pet question put off, pet policy on file; deflection: a question the records do not answer).
About $4.49 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.088. Latency: Production reference 36 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 41 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-sonnet-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-30-pinned-oct30-r3-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: No change: production's claude-sonnet-5 run a second time in the same window, the noise floor every candidate is held to, and the check that production still reproduces baseline v1. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 32 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | Never-do fails: no tour times offered / deflected to the team with the answer on file | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 14 of 51 | 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 1 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,315,468 (4,216,616) / 177,375 ($22.78) | 39 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 14 of 51 | 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 | 1 / 0 | offers_tour_times 1, no_em_dash 1 | 16 / 25 / 10 | 28 of 51 | 11 of 51 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,797,540 (9,602,271) / 181,876 ($4.22) | 35 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 16 / 25 / 10. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 4 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 4 rows have a judge call.
all red 23 of 23 caught. Code checks 18 of 18 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 9 of 9 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better; deflection: pet question put off, pet policy on file; deflection: a question the records do not answer).
About $4.22 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.083. Latency: Production reference 39 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 35 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-sonnet-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-30-pinned-oct30-r2-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: No change: production's claude-sonnet-5 run a second time in the same window, the noise floor every candidate is held to, and the check that production still reproduces baseline v1. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 33 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | Never-do fails: no tour times offered / deflected to the team with the answer on file | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 14 of 51 | 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 1 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,682,294 (9,492,298) / 182,773 ($4.2) | 41 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 15 of 51 | 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 | 1 / 0 | no_em_dash 2, offers_tour_times 1 | 13 / 28 / 10 | 26 of 51 | 11 of 51 | 5 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 10,016,498 (9,831,154) / 172,220 ($4.15) | 34 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 13 / 28 / 10. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 4 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 4 rows have a judge call.
all red 23 of 23 caught. Code checks 18 of 18 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 9 of 9 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better; deflection: pet question put off, pet policy on file; deflection: a question the records do not answer).
About $4.15 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.081. Latency: Production reference 41 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 34 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-sonnet-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-pin-at-start/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-30-pinned-oct30-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: No change: production's claude-sonnet-5 run a second time in the same window, the noise floor every candidate is held to, and the check that production still reproduces baseline v1. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 37 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | Never-do fails: no tour times offered / deflected to the team with the answer on file | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 15 of 51 | 4 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 1 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,667,085 (6,627,892) / 154,256 ($14.77) | 33 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | FAIL | 12 of 51 | 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 | 1 / 0 | offers_tour_times 1 | 10 / 27 / 14 | 26 of 51 | 16 of 51 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 10,015,036 (9,839,419) / 157,938 ($3.99) | 35 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 10 / 27 / 14. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 4 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 4 rows have a judge call.
all red 23 of 23 caught. Code checks 18 of 18 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 9 of 9 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better; deflection: pet question put off, pet policy on file; deflection: a question the records do not answer).
About $3.99 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.078. Latency: Production reference 33 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 35 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-sonnet-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-first-email-cut/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-30-first-email-cut-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 33 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | Never-do fails: no tour times offered / deflected to the team with the answer on file | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 15 of 51 | 2 / 0 / 0 / 1 | 1 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,553,890 (4,432,394) / 181,902 ($22.95) | 40 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 13 of 51 | 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | no_invented_tour_time 1, no_em_dash 1 | 19 / 18 / 14 | 21 of 51 | 12 of 51 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,911,306 (9,716,279) / 175,785 ($4.19) | 38 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 claude-opus-5-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 15 of 51 | 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | none | 33 / 14 / 4 | 17 of 51 | 5 of 51 | 0 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 12,074,697 (6,716,322) / 77,151 ($46.62) | 24 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 1 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 33 / 14 / 4. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 23 of 23 caught. Code checks 18 of 18 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 9 of 9 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better; deflection: pet question put off, pet policy on file; deflection: a question the records do not answer).
About $46.62 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.914. Latency: Production reference 40 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 38 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5 24 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-30-post-23764-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 33 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | Never-do fails: no tour times offered / deflected to the team with the answer on file | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 13 of 51 | 1 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,194,653 (9,035,726) / 183,484 ($4.05) | 36 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 16 of 51 | 4 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | no_em_dash 3 | 7 / 30 / 14 | 31 of 51 | 10 of 51 | 2 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 10,624,080 (10,394,926) / 186,243 ($4.49) | 41 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 claude-opus-5-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 14 of 51 | 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | none | 29 / 17 / 5 | 17 of 51 | 8 of 51 | 1 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 12,513,680 (12,347,115) / 81,502 ($7.42) | 23 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 29 / 17 / 5. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 23 of 23 caught. Code checks 18 of 18 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 9 of 9 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better; deflection: pet question put off, pet policy on file; deflection: a question the records do not answer).
About $7.42 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.145. Latency: Production reference 36 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 41 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5 23 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-30-pinned-oct30-r3-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 32 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | Never-do fails: no tour times offered / deflected to the team with the answer on file | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 14 of 51 | 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 1 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,315,468 (4,216,616) / 177,375 ($22.78) | 39 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 14 of 51 | 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 | 1 / 0 | offers_tour_times 1, no_em_dash 1 | 16 / 25 / 10 | 28 of 51 | 11 of 51 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,797,540 (9,602,271) / 181,876 ($4.22) | 35 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 claude-opus-5-5 | 51 of 51 | FAIL | 13 of 51 | 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 | 0 / 0 | no_team_told 1 | 30 / 20 / 1 | 20 of 51 | 4 of 51 | 0 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 13,663,024 (8,523,536) / 81,666 ($45.58) | 23 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 1 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 30 / 20 / 1. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 23 of 23 caught. Code checks 18 of 18 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 9 of 9 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better; deflection: pet question put off, pet policy on file; deflection: a question the records do not answer).
About $45.58 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.894. Latency: Production reference 39 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 35 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5 23 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-30-pinned-oct30-r2-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 33 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | Never-do fails: no tour times offered / deflected to the team with the answer on file | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 14 of 51 | 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 1 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,682,294 (9,492,298) / 182,773 ($4.2) | 41 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 15 of 51 | 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 | 1 / 0 | no_em_dash 2, offers_tour_times 1 | 13 / 28 / 10 | 26 of 51 | 11 of 51 | 5 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 10,016,498 (9,831,154) / 172,220 ($4.15) | 34 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 claude-opus-5-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 12 of 51 | 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | none | 34 / 14 / 3 | 13 of 51 | 7 of 51 | 1 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 12,293,094 (12,114,849) / 80,407 ($7.36) | 22 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 34 / 14 / 3. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 23 of 23 caught. Code checks 18 of 18 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 9 of 9 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better; deflection: pet question put off, pet policy on file; deflection: a question the records do not answer).
About $7.36 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.144. Latency: Production reference 41 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 34 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5 22 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-pin-at-start/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-30-pinned-oct30-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 37 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | Never-do fails: no tour times offered / deflected to the team with the answer on file | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 15 of 51 | 4 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 1 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,667,085 (6,627,892) / 154,256 ($14.77) | 33 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | FAIL | 12 of 51 | 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 | 1 / 0 | offers_tour_times 1 | 10 / 27 / 14 | 26 of 51 | 16 of 51 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 10,015,036 (9,839,419) / 157,938 ($3.99) | 35 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 claude-opus-5-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 12 of 51 | 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | none | 27 / 19 / 5 | 23 of 51 | 6 of 51 | 1 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 12,770,691 (7,699,804) / 77,251 ($44.64) | 22 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 27 / 19 / 5. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 23 of 23 caught. Code checks 18 of 18 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 9 of 9 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better; deflection: pet question put off, pet policy on file; deflection: a question the records do not answer).
About $44.64 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.875. Latency: Production reference 33 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 35 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5 22 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-first-email-cut/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-30-first-email-cut-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: Writer claude-opus-5-5 with today's first-email prompt cut by deletion only (34 blocks for other jobs or duplicates removed, 6 RULE headings flattened, no rule added or reworded): about 95K to 72K system tokens. Tools, checks and inputs unchanged. Local branch fede/first-email-split-by-deletion, no PR.. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 37 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | Never-do fails: no tour times offered / deflected to the team with the answer on file | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 15 of 51 | 4 / 1 / 0 / 0 | 1 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,667,085 (6,627,892) / 154,256 ($14.77) | 33 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | FAIL | 12 of 51 | 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 | 1 / 0 | offers_tour_times 1 | 10 / 27 / 14 | 26 of 51 | 16 of 51 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 10,015,036 (9,839,419) / 157,938 ($3.99) | 35 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5-cut claude-opus-5-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 12 of 51 | 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | none | 28 / 21 / 2 | 20 of 51 | 5 of 51 | 1 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,411,779 (5,529,943) / 74,025 ($34.32) | 21 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5-cut: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5-cut: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 28 / 21 / 2. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 23 of 23 caught. Code checks 18 of 18 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 9 of 9 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better; deflection: pet question put off, pet policy on file; deflection: a question the records do not answer).
About $34.32 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.673. Latency: Production reference 33 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 35 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5-cut 21 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5-cut --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-first-email-cut/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-30-first-email-cut-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: No change: production's claude-sonnet-5 run a second time in the same window, the noise floor every candidate is held to, and the check that production still reproduces baseline v1. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 27 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 14 of 51 | 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,259,905 (4,025,249) / 133,128 ($22.91) | 36 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | FAIL | 12 of 51 | 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 | no_em_dash 2 | 12 / 29 / 10 | 25 of 51 | 8 of 51 | 2 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,401,862 (4,659,377) / 150,134 ($21.19) | 33 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 12 / 29 / 10. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 4 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 4 rows have a judge call.
not all red 18 of 19 caught. Code checks 13 of 13 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 6 of 7 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better).
About $21.19 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.415. Latency: Production reference 36 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 33 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-sonnet-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-29-post-23482-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: No change: production's claude-sonnet-5 run a second time in the same window, the noise floor every candidate is held to, and the check that production still reproduces baseline v1. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 38 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 13 of 51 | 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,936,849 (5,199,508) / 173,892 ($21.44) | 34 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 15 of 51 | 3 / 1 / 1 / 0 | invented_facts 1, no_empty_reply 1, no_em_dash 3, no_invented_tour_time 1 | 6 / 25 / 20 | 27 of 51 | 18 of 51 | 2 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,345,517 (9,177,571) / 178,395 ($4.05) | 37 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 1 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 6 / 25 / 20. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 4 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 4 rows have a judge call.
all red 19 of 19 caught. Code checks 13 of 13 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 7 of 7 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better).
About $4.05 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.079. Latency: Production reference 34 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 37 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-sonnet-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-29-post-23203-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 27 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 14 of 51 | 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,259,905 (4,025,249) / 133,128 ($22.91) | 36 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | FAIL | 12 of 51 | 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 | no_em_dash 2 | 12 / 29 / 10 | 25 of 51 | 8 of 51 | 2 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,401,862 (4,659,377) / 150,134 ($21.19) | 33 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 claude-opus-5-5 | 51 of 51 | FAIL | 13 of 51 | 0 / 1 / 0 / 1 | no_team_told 1, no_empty_reply 1, no_invented_tour_time 1 | 24 / 22 / 5 | 24 of 51 | 8 of 51 | 0 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 12,496,651 (7,387,356) / 74,322 ($44.83) | 19 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 1 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 24 / 22 / 5. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
not all red 18 of 19 caught. Code checks 13 of 13 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 6 of 7 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better).
About $44.83 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.879. Latency: Production reference 36 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 33 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5 19 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-29-post-23482-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 38 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 13 of 51 | 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,936,849 (5,199,508) / 173,892 ($21.44) | 34 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 15 of 51 | 3 / 1 / 1 / 0 | invented_facts 1, no_empty_reply 1, no_em_dash 3, no_invented_tour_time 1 | 6 / 25 / 20 | 27 of 51 | 18 of 51 | 2 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,345,517 (9,177,571) / 178,395 ($4.05) | 37 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 claude-opus-5-5 | 51 of 51 | FAIL | 15 of 51 | 0 / 1 / 0 / 1 | no_team_told 1, no_invented_tour_time 1 | 25 / 16 / 10 | 17 of 51 | 11 of 51 | 1 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 12,059,174 (7,344,263) / 79,426 ($41.76) | 20 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 1 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 1 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 25 / 16 / 10. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 19 of 19 caught. Code checks 13 of 13 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 7 of 7 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better).
About $41.76 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.819. Latency: Production reference 34 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 37 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5 20 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-29-post-23203-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5-goal, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: full (51 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks; the set holds 51 the door can rebuild, so the full tier is 51, not 300 (never padded). Clock 240 min per arm; the command took 38 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The full tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 51.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 13 of 51 | 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,936,849 (5,199,508) / 173,892 ($21.44) | 34 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 | PASS | 15 of 51 | 3 / 1 / 1 / 0 | invented_facts 1, no_empty_reply 1, no_em_dash 3, no_invented_tour_time 1 | 6 / 25 / 20 | 27 of 51 | 18 of 51 | 2 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 9,345,517 (9,177,571) / 178,395 ($4.05) | 37 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5-goal claude-opus-5-5 | 51 of 51 | FAIL | 13 of 51 | 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 | no_empty_reply 2, no_invented_tour_time 1 | 24 / 17 / 10 | 16 of 51 | 11 of 51 | 1 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 14,702,294 (9,670,694) / 83,262 ($45.18) | 24 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (51): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 1 Candidate claude-opus-5-5-goal: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5-goal: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 24 / 17 / 10. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 19 of 19 caught. Code checks 13 of 13 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 7 of 7 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better).
About $45.18 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.886. Latency: Production reference 34 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 37 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5-goal 24 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5-goal --tier full); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-29-post-23203-prospect-first-email-fullnever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-sonnet-5-5, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: smoke (30 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks. Clock 20 min per arm; the command took 40 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 30 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The smoke tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 30.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 10 of 30 | 0 / 1 / 2 / 1 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,583,847 (5,478,892) / 101,928 ($2.37) | 33 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | PASS | 10 of 30 | 3 / 0 / 3 / 0 | no_em_dash 3, invented_facts 2 | 6 / 17 / 7 | 15 of 30 | 7 of 30 | 1 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,447,458 (5,374,658) / 97,400 ($2.22) | 36 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Candidate claude-sonnet-5-5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | 30 of 30 | FAIL | 13 of 30 | 0 / 0 / 7 / 1 | invented_facts 6, no_team_told 1 | 15 / 5 / 10 | 7 of 30 | 9 of 30 | 1 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,880,480 (5,812,653) / 33,277 (no list price on file) | 16 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 2 Production run 2 (noise floor): 3 Candidate claude-sonnet-5-5: 7 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 1 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-sonnet-5-5: 1 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 15 / 5 / 10. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 17 of 17 caught. Code checks 11 of 11 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 6 of 6 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better).
Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Latency: Production reference 33 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 36 s per turn; Candidate claude-sonnet-5-5 16 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-sonnet-5-5 --tier smoke); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-rerun/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-28-prospect-first-email-smokenever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.cost.total_list_usd: no list price on file for claude-sonnet-5-5What changed: No change: production's claude-sonnet-5 run a second time in the same window, the noise floor every candidate is held to, and the check that production still reproduces baseline v1. Tier: smoke (30 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks. Clock 20 min per arm; the command took 40 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 30 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The smoke tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 30.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 10 of 30 | 0 / 1 / 2 / 1 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,583,847 (5,478,892) / 101,928 ($2.37) | 33 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | PASS | 10 of 30 | 3 / 0 / 3 / 0 | no_em_dash 3, invented_facts 2 | 6 / 17 / 7 | 15 of 30 | 7 of 30 | 1 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,447,458 (5,374,658) / 97,400 ($2.22) | 36 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 2 Production run 2 (noise floor): 3 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 1 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 6 / 17 / 7. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 4 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 4 rows have a judge call.
all red 17 of 17 caught. Code checks 11 of 11 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 6 of 6 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better).
About $2.22 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.074. Latency: Production reference 33 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 36 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-sonnet-5 --tier smoke); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-rerun/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-28-prospect-first-email-smokenever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: smoke (30 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks. Clock 20 min per arm; the command took 20 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 30 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The smoke tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 30.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 9 of 30 | 1 / 0 / 3 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,742,214 (2,820,952) / 104,259 ($13.14) | 46 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | PASS | 11 of 30 | 0 / 1 / 3 / 0 | invented_facts 1, no_invented_tour_time 1 | 6 / 15 / 9 | 16 of 30 | 9 of 30 | 5 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,516,380 (5,427,306) / 101,032 ($2.31) | 39 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 claude-opus-5-5 | 30 of 30 | FAIL | 9 of 30 | 0 / 0 / 1 / 1 | invented_facts 1, no_team_told 1 | 11 / 10 / 9 | 11 of 30 | 7 of 30 | 4 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 7,075,983 (4,110,434) / 47,733 ($26.03) | 20 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 3 Production run 2 (noise floor): 3 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 1 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 1 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 11 / 10 / 9. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 11 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 11 rows have a judge call.
all red 18 of 18 caught. Code checks 11 of 11 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 7 of 7 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better).
About $26.03 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.868. Latency: Production reference 46 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 39 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5 20 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier smoke); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-001run/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-28-postfold-prospect-first-email-smokenever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5, on production's prompt as deployed, which now carries #23112 and #23161 (the Open now line gives the open home's bath, size and rent). Tier: smoke (30 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks. Clock 20 min per arm; the command took 23 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 30 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The smoke tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 30.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 10 of 30 | 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,445,863 (2,507,981) / 99,895 ($13.11) | 37 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | FAIL | 11 of 30 | 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 | no_em_dash 1 | 9 / 14 / 7 | 14 of 30 | 10 of 30 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,790,946 (5,694,722) / 104,280 ($2.4) | 39 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 claude-opus-5-5 | 30 of 30 | PASS | 9 of 30 | 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 | none | 21 / 7 / 2 | 7 of 30 | 4 of 30 | 0 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 7,013,866 (4,024,917) / 50,334 ($26.23) | 21 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 21 / 7 / 2. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 30 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 30 rows have a judge call.
all red 19 of 19 caught. Code checks 13 of 13 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 7 of 7 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better).
About $26.23 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.874. Latency: Production reference 37 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 39 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5 21 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier smoke); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-28-post-23161-prospect-first-email-smokenever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5, on production's prompt as deployed at web commit a504b90be, which now carries the first-email rule fixes from #23123. Tier: smoke (30 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks. Clock 20 min per arm; the command took 21 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 30 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The smoke tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 30.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 10 of 30 | 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 6,006,779 (3,055,702) / 126,064 ($13.47) | 51 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | FAIL | 8 of 30 | 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 | no_invented_tour_time 1 | 5 / 12 / 13 | 13 of 30 | 12 of 30 | 4 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 6,343,197 (6,217,032) / 96,885 ($2.5) | 36 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 claude-opus-5-5 | 30 of 30 | PASS | 8 of 30 | 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 | none | 12 / 6 / 12 | 9 of 30 | 11 of 30 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 7,077,361 (4,122,502) / 44,588 ($25.95) | 22 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 12 / 6 / 12. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 19 of 19 caught. Code checks 13 of 13 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 7 of 7 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better).
About $25.95 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.865. Latency: Production reference 51 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 36 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5 22 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier smoke); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23123/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-28-post-23123-prospect-first-email-smokenever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: One difference from the claude-opus-5-5 row in the same window: a 3 sentence goal block placed first in the system prompt. Exact text: <objective> This first email has one goal: get the prospect to book a tour, by answering their question from the home facts and knowledge below and offering real tour times from the tour slots you check. Success is a reply where they pick a time, and every fact in the email is in the inputs. Never invent a fact, a price or a time, never name a second home or give counts of homes, and never correct an earlier email unless the facts changed. </objective>. Tier: smoke (30 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks. Clock 20 min per arm; the command took 23 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 30 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The smoke tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 30.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 10 of 30 | 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,445,863 (2,507,981) / 99,895 ($13.11) | 37 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | FAIL | 11 of 30 | 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 | no_em_dash 1 | 9 / 14 / 7 | 14 of 30 | 10 of 30 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,790,946 (5,694,722) / 104,280 ($2.4) | 39 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 + goal block claude-opus-5-5 | 30 of 30 | FAIL | 7 of 30 | 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 | no_empty_reply 1 | 18 / 9 / 3 | 7 of 30 | 5 of 30 | 1 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 6,995,356 (4,095,376) / 46,994 ($25.58) | 21 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5-goal: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5-goal: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 18 / 9 / 3. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 19 of 19 caught. Code checks 13 of 13 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 7 of 7 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better; thank-you opener taken out: never production better).
About $25.58 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.853. Latency: Production reference 37 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 39 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5-goal 21 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5-goal --tier smoke); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-post23161/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-28-post-23161-prospect-first-email-smokenever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration; the stopping rule says run the full tier.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: smoke (30 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks. Clock 20 min per arm; the command took 40 min of wall time in all.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 30 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The smoke tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 30.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 10 of 30 | 0 / 1 / 2 / 1 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,583,847 (5,478,892) / 101,928 ($2.37) | 33 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | PASS | 10 of 30 | 3 / 0 / 3 / 0 | no_em_dash 3, invented_facts 2 | 6 / 17 / 7 | 15 of 30 | 7 of 30 | 1 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,447,458 (5,374,658) / 97,400 ($2.22) | 36 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 claude-opus-5-5 | 30 of 30 | FAIL | 11 of 30 | 0 / 0 / 1 / 1 | no_team_told 1, invented_facts 1 | 13 / 12 / 5 | 9 of 30 | 6 of 30 | 2 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 8,272,497 (6,543,751) / 48,451 ($17.09) | 23 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 2 Production run 2 (noise floor): 3 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 1 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 1 Production run 2 (noise floor): 0 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 1 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 13 / 12 / 5. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 17 of 17 caught. Code checks 11 of 11 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 6 of 6 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better).
About $17.09 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.57. Latency: Production reference 33 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 36 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5 23 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier smoke); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-rerun/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-28-prospect-first-email-smokenever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-sonnet-5-5, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: smoke (30 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks. Clock 20 min per arm; the command took 29 min of wall time in all (plus earlier invocations made before wall time was kept, not counted).) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 30 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The smoke tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 30.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 11 of 30 | 2 / 0 / 6 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,940,958 (4,295,561) / 128,985 ($8.51) | 52 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | PASS | 9 of 30 | 1 / 0 / 5 / 1 | no_em_dash 1, no_team_told 1 | 8 / 15 / 7 | 16 of 30 | 7 of 30 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,930,104 (5,624,486) / 119,452 ($3.35) | 46 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Candidate claude-sonnet-5-5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | 30 of 30 | FAIL | 7 of 30 | 0 / 0 / 8 / 1 | invented_facts 2, no_team_told 1 | 8 / 6 / 16 | 2 of 30 | 5 of 30 | 5 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 10,058,287 (8,324,998) / 48,701 (no list price on file) | 27 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 6 Production run 2 (noise floor): 5 Candidate claude-sonnet-5-5: 8 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 1 Candidate claude-sonnet-5-5: 1 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 8 / 6 / 16. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 17 of 17 caught. Code checks 11 of 11 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 6 of 6 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better).
Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Latency: Production reference 52 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 46 s per turn; Candidate claude-sonnet-5-5 27 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-sonnet-5-5 --tier smoke); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-upgrade/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-27-prospect-first-email-smokenever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.cost.total_list_usd: no list price on file for claude-sonnet-5-5What changed: No change: production's claude-sonnet-5 run a second time in the same window, the noise floor every candidate is held to, and the check that production still reproduces baseline v1. Tier: smoke (30 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks. Clock 20 min per arm; the command took 29 min of wall time in all (plus earlier invocations made before wall time was kept, not counted).) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 30 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The smoke tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 30.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 11 of 30 | 2 / 0 / 6 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,940,958 (4,295,561) / 128,985 ($8.51) | 52 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | PASS | 9 of 30 | 1 / 0 / 5 / 1 | no_em_dash 1, no_team_told 1 | 8 / 15 / 7 | 16 of 30 | 7 of 30 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,930,104 (5,624,486) / 119,452 ($3.35) | 46 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 6 Production run 2 (noise floor): 5 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 1 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 8 / 15 / 7. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 4 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 4 rows have a judge call.
all red 17 of 17 caught. Code checks 11 of 11 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 6 of 6 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better).
About $3.35 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.112. Latency: Production reference 52 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 46 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-sonnet-5 --tier smoke); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-upgrade/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-27-prospect-first-email-smokenever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: The writer model only: claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5-5, with today's production prompt, tools and checks unchanged. Tier: smoke (30 items, decided before the run by the set's tier marks. Clock 20 min per arm; the command took 29 min of wall time in all (plus earlier invocations made before wall time was kept, not counted).) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 30 prospect first email · 0 Spanish slice · 9 Fede's graded cards. Frozen Oct 25 (sets/v1, LOCK.json). The smoke tier runs the items the door can rebuild: 30.
| Set | Arm | Items run (door full mode) | Bar | Held by send checks | Never-do fails: em dash / invented tour time / invented facts / told the team | New never-do vs reference | Judge vs reference: this arm better / tie / production better | Same email (both orders) | Drops a fact production gave | Fede's graded cards: production better | Spanish | Tokens in (cached) / out (list $) | Latency p50 | Served model | Request shape (vs the swap branch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production reference baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | reference (what every arm is judged against) | 11 of 30 | 2 / 0 / 6 / 0 | n/a | n/a (reference) | n/a | n/a | n/a | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,940,958 (4,295,561) / 128,985 ($8.51) | 52 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production run 2 (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 | PASS | 9 of 30 | 1 / 0 / 5 / 1 | no_em_dash 1, no_team_told 1 | 8 / 15 / 7 | 16 of 30 | 7 of 30 | 3 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 5,930,104 (5,624,486) / 119,452 ($3.35) | 46 s per turn | claude-sonnet-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Candidate claude-opus-5-5 claude-opus-5-5 | 30 of 30 | FAIL | 10 of 30 | 0 / 0 / 7 / 0 | no_empty_reply 1, invented_facts 3 | 8 / 5 / 17 | 4 of 30 | 10 of 30 | 5 of 9 | no Spanish item in this tier | 10,535,862 (8,208,455) / 60,197 ($22.2) | 29 s per turn | claude-opus-5-5 (proven on every call) | effort high, max_tokens 16384, thinking adaptive summarized, tool_choice auto, temperature none (30): same as the swap branch |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Production reference: 6 Production run 2 (noise floor): 5 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 7 |
| "Check with the team" | Production reference: 0 Production run 2 (noise floor): 1 Candidate claude-opus-5-5: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry it |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion) |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yet |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen set |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production reference run, same window, same items (Blind pair, both orders; a side wins only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. First emails: the judge also lists the facts each email drops that the other gives (counted only when both orders list one).): 8 / 5 / 17. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 8 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 0 of 0 graded (–); 8 rows have a judge call.
all red 17 of 17 caught. Code checks 11 of 11 as planted (red and clean twins); served-model proof refuses sonnet 5.5 when sonnet 5 was asked; write blocker refused 4 planted writes and sends; judge 6 of 6 (identical pair: no side picked, no drop; real reply beats filler; facts cut: drop listed, cut email never better).
About $22.2 at list. Ran on the Claude subscription. List price of the writer tokens (cache reads at 0.1x input, cache writes at the one-hour 2x); the judge is not counted. Rates as Benchmark B published them (Sonnet 5 $2 / $10, Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million); no rate on file for other models. Per item: $0.74. Latency: Production reference 52 s per turn; Production run 2 (noise floor) 46 s per turn; Candidate claude-opus-5-5 29 s per turn. p50 of one whole turn (tool loop plus the door), 4 workers.
clara-benchmark runner/upgrade.ts (bench upgrade --surface first_email --model claude-opus-5-5 --tier smoke); run folder /Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-bench-wt-upgrade/runner/out/upgrade-2026-10-27-prospect-first-email-smokenever_do.promise_outside_tools: not a code check in this bench; the send checks (held count) carry itnever_do.over_share: not a code check in this bench; the judge scores it (no_overshare criterion)never_do.teammate_thread: first emails start the thread; no teammate has replied yetnever_do.leaks: every item is a prospect first email from the frozen setlinks.results_md: the full results stay local (tenant and prospect text never in git); the run folder is under links.runnerdecision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: Today's production first-email prompt cut into four pieces (rules, voice, facts, task) under four bare headers, with no word added, removed or reworded, run on production's exact model and compared with production run three times (the noise floor).. Tier: full (Every runnable first email (51 of 53; two graded examples from Fede's review set, n27 and n33, cannot be rebuilt by the door). No Spanish first emails exist in the set.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email. The same 51 runnable first emails as slice H. Each request is assembled read-only by the service door from production's live state, then sent on the subscription.
| Set | Arm | Items run (mode) | Held by send checks | Invented facts / em dash | Told the team / empty reply | Tool calls: save prospect / check availability / available units / deferred asks / update prospect / forward | Judge vs production run A: same email (both orders) | Judge vs production run A: this arm better / tie / run A better | Served model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run A (reference) baseline claude-sonnet-5 (production's leasing first-email model) | 51 of 51 (door full mode) | 26 of 51 | 9 / 4 | 0 / 0 | 25 / 6 / 11 / 38 / 10 / 0 | n/a (reference) | n/a (reference) | claude-sonnet-5 |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run B (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 (production's leasing first-email model) | 51 of 51 (door full mode) | 19 of 51 | 8 / 2 | 1 / 0 | 29 / 8 / 9 / 40 / 9 / 1 | 16 of 51 | 12 / 24 / 15 | claude-sonnet-5 |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production run C (noise floor) claude-sonnet-5 (production's leasing first-email model) | 51 of 51 (door full mode) | 21 of 51 | 8 / 3 | 1 / 0 | 27 / 6 / 10 / 38 / 10 / 1 | 18 of 51 | 12 / 25 / 14 | claude-sonnet-5 |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Pure split (four pieces, nothing reworded) claude-sonnet-5 (production's leasing first-email model) | 51 of 51 (door full mode) | 22 of 51 | 9 / 5 | 0 / 0 | 30 / 3 / 9 / 38 / 8 / 1 | 20 of 51 | 13 / 27 / 11 | claude-sonnet-5 |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Prospect first email v1, full tier: Production run A (reference): 9 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Production run B (noise floor): 8 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Production run C (noise floor): 8 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Pure split (four pieces, nothing reworded): 9 |
| "Check with the team" | Prospect first email v1, full tier: Production run A (reference): 0 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Production run B (noise floor): 1 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Production run C (noise floor): 1 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Pure split (four pieces, nothing reworded): 0 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: Not checked on this run. |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: The over-share check was not run. |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: First emails have no teammate thread. |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: Every item is a prospect by construction. |
claude-fable-5-1, vs production run A (Pair judge, both orders; 'same email' only when both orders say so, 'better' only when both orders agree, otherwise tie. Differences named by type (special, tour times, home facts, other homes, answer, hand-off, tour state, voice, dash). Calendar-minute shifts in offered times are not a difference.): Split vs A: 13 W / 27 T / 11 L; noise B vs A: 12 / 24 / 15; noise C vs A: 12 / 25 / 14. Per arm in the table above.
No review set for step 1; step 2 carries the review page.
all red 15 of 15 caught. Split proof: rebuilding the prompt from the pieces gives production's text byte for byte on 51 of 51; the only added text is the four headers and their joins (123 characters on every item). Judge controls 5 of 5: an identical pair judged the same; a dropped special, a changed rent, an added em dash and removed tour times each judged different with run A better. Code check controls red on every run folder (9 of 9 planted).
Ran on the Claude subscription, no metered key. Not compared: arms ran against a live door, so timings mix door and model time.
/Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-benchmark/runner/baseline.ts --writer-prompt split (runner/prompts/first-email-decomposed.ts splitFirstEmail)arms.0.clean_pct: This row measures the split against production's own noise, not a clean rate.arms.1.clean_pct: Noise floor arm.arms.2.clean_pct: Noise floor arm.arms.3.clean_pct: Measured against the noise floor, not a clean rate.never_do.promise_outside_tools: Not checked on this run.never_do.over_share: The over-share check was not run.never_do.teammate_thread: First emails have no teammate thread.never_do.leaks: Every item is a prospect by construction.cost.total_list_usd: Ran on the subscription; tokens not totalled.cost.per_item: Ran on the subscription; tokens not totalled.human_verdicts: No review set for step 1; step 2 carries the review page.links.results_md: The raw emails of the four runs were deleted with the merged worktree on Oct 26; the judge files, counts and per-example tallies are kept locally (~/.clara-bench/runs/pure-split-2026-10-27) and carry prospect text, so they are not linked.verdict: Step 1 is a refactor check for Fede; step 2 waits on it.decision: Pending Fede.What changed: Writer setting on the v1 runner: production writer, Opus 5.5 on the decomposed prompt (restrictive), and the same plus door 2 facts block from frozen records (full context), no draft checks applied to the candidates.; tenant texts get the same full arm from a frozen tenant record (clara-benchmark #29). Tier: full (First email full (51), tenant other text full (150), tenant repair text smoke (20, every item the door can rebuild). Tenant full context (added Oct 26 evening): the door already gives the tenant writer the tenant, unit, lease dates, open work orders at the text, property knowledge and the thread, so the tenant full arm is the same facts frozen and re-rendered as one block with an id on every line, plus the lease terms (rent, due day, late fee, autopay) and a "Context missing" line built from the door's own omitted list (balance always, office actions before the turn, open matter, renewal, work order status on the day). All three tenant arms were rerun together that evening on the same items so they compare.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 51 prospect first email · 20 tenant repair text · 150 tenant other text. Same items as the Oct 25 baseline rows (first email full 51, tenant repair smoke 20, tenant other full 150). Frozen first-email facts: sets/v1/prospect-first-email.context.json, 69 of 73 items, all 51 runnable covered, recorded Oct 23 by Bench A. Frozen tenant facts (added Oct 26 evening): sets/v1/tenant-repair-text.context.json (20 of 20) and tenant-other-text.context.json (150 of 150), each record with a content hash.
| Set | Arm | Items run (mode) | Noise rate: replied where staff answered in 48 h (primary) | Replied / silent | Helpful rate: replies without "told the team" | Held by send checks | Invented facts / em dash | Broken promises (tour said booked, no booking / told the team, no ask) | Spanish answered in Spanish | Served model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production (today) baseline production default (claude-sonnet-5) | 51 of 51 (door full mode) | n/a (every first email gets a reply) | 51 / 0 | 51 of 51 (100%) | 21 of 51 (41%) | 9 / 2 | 0 (0 / 0) | no Spanish replies | claude-sonnet-5 |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt) claude-opus-5-5 | 51 of 51 (door full mode) | n/a (every first email gets a reply) | 51 / 0 | 50 of 51 (98%) | 19 of 51 (37%) | 15 / 0 | 0 (0 / 0) | no Spanish replies | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts) claude-opus-5-5 | 51 of 51 (door full mode) | n/a (every first email gets a reply) | 50 / 1 | 47 of 50 (94%) | 16 of 51 (31%) | 4 / 0 | 0 (0 / 0) | no Spanish replies | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier | Production (today) baseline production default (claude-sonnet-5) | 20 of 20 (door full mode) | 10 of 10 (100%); 10 unknown left out | 19 / 1 | 18 of 19 (95%) | n/a (no tenant send check at the door) | 0 / 1 | 1 (0 / 1) | 4 of 4 (100%) | claude-sonnet-5 |
| Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier | Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt) claude-opus-5-5 | 20 of 20 (door full mode) | 6 of 10 (60%); 10 unknown left out | 10 / 10 | 10 of 10 (100%) | n/a (no tenant send check at the door) | 0 / 0 | 0 (0 / 0) | 2 of 2 (100%) | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier | Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts) claude-opus-5-5 | 20 of 20 (door full mode) | 7 of 10 (70%); 10 unknown left out | 11 / 9 | 11 of 11 (100%) | n/a (no tenant send check at the door) | 1 / 0 | 0 (0 / 0) | 2 of 2 (100%) | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Tenant other text v1, full tier | Production (today) baseline production default (claude-sonnet-5) | 150 of 150 (door full mode) | 84 of 99 (85%); 51 unknown left out | 122 / 28 | 76 of 122 (62%) | n/a (no tenant send check at the door) | 8 / 3 | 0 (0 / 0) | 19 of 20 (95%) | claude-sonnet-5 |
| Tenant other text v1, full tier | Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt) claude-opus-5-5 | 150 of 150 (door full mode) | 44 of 99 (44%); 51 unknown left out | 56 / 94 | 30 of 56 (54%) | n/a (no tenant send check at the door) | 7 / 0 | 0 (0 / 0) | 11 of 11 (100%) | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Tenant other text v1, full tier | Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts) claude-opus-5-5 | 150 of 150 (door full mode) | 53 of 99 (54%); 51 unknown left out | 66 / 84 | 37 of 66 (56%) | n/a (no tenant send check at the door) | 8 / 0 | 0 (0 / 0) | 13 of 13 (100%) | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Spanish slice v1 (Spanish rows of the tenant surfaces above) | Production (today) baseline production default (claude-sonnet-5) | 27 (door full mode) | 13 of 13 (100%) | 24 / 3 | 20 of 24 (83%) | n/a | 3 / n/a | 0 | 23 of 24 (96%) | production default (claude-sonnet-5) |
| Spanish slice v1 (Spanish rows of the tenant surfaces above) | Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt) claude-opus-5-5 | 27 (door full mode) | 10 of 13 (77%) | 13 / 14 | 13 of 13 (100%) | n/a | 2 / n/a | 0 | 13 of 13 (100%) | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Spanish slice v1 (Spanish rows of the tenant surfaces above) | Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts) claude-opus-5-5 | 27 (door full mode) | 11 of 13 (85%) | 15 / 12 | 14 of 15 (93%) | n/a | 1 / n/a | 0 | 15 of 15 (100%) | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Prospect first email v1, full tier: Production (today): 9 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt): 15 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts): 4 Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier: Production (today): 0 Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier: Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt): 0 Tenant other text v1, full tier: Production (today): 8 Tenant other text v1, full tier: Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt): 7 Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier: Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts): 1 Tenant other text v1, full tier: Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts): 8 |
| "Check with the team" | Prospect first email v1, full tier: Production (today): 0 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt): 1 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts): 3 Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier: Production (today): 1 Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier: Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt): 0 Tenant other text v1, full tier: Production (today): 46 Tenant other text v1, full tier: Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt): 26 Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier: Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts): 0 Tenant other text v1, full tier: Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts): 29 |
| Promise outside tools | Prospect first email v1, full tier: Production (today): 0 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt): 0 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts): 0 Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier: Production (today): 1 Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier: Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt): 0 Tenant other text v1, full tier: Production (today): 0 Tenant other text v1, full tier: Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt): 0 Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier: Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts): 0 Tenant other text v1, full tier: Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts): 0 |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: The over-share check was not run. |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | Prospect first email v1, full tier: Production (today): 0 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt): 0 Prospect first email v1, full tier: Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts): 0 Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier: Production (today): 10 Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier: Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt): 6 Tenant other text v1, full tier: Production (today): 84 Tenant other text v1, full tier: Restrictive (Opus, decomposed prompt): 44 Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier: Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts): 7 Tenant other text v1, full tier: Full context (Opus, decomposed + frozen facts): 53 |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: Every item is a tenant or a prospect by construction. |
No judge: Candidates were not judged; tenant-other judge controls failed on Oct 25, so a judge column would not count.
No review set for this run.
all red 12 of 12 caught. Byte-identical proof of the production writer: one door read per item, the request built by origin/main and by the new runner compared byte for byte: first email 51 of 51, tenant repair 20 of 20, tenant other 150 of 150 identical; planted controls (one changed byte, changed model, changed tool list) 0 of 6 identical on each side. Code check controls ran red per run (team-told English and Spanish, em dash, invented amount, Spanish in English, each with a clean twin). Broken-promise check: planted booked-no-booking and told-team-no-ask RED, clean twins GREEN (unit test). Code check controls red on 9 of 9 run folders. Tenant rerun: code check controls red on 6 of 6 run folders (9 of 9 each); tenant facts swap planted controls (no lease named missing, block missing or doubled throws, prospect record refused) in clara-benchmark #29; swap applied to all 170 real rebuilds, 0 failed.
Ran on the Claude subscription (Keychain bearer, no metered key). Token counts are not totalled per run. Not compared: arms ran one after another against a live door, so timings mix door and model time.
/Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-benchmark/runner/baseline.ts (writer flags: --writer-model, --writer-prompt, --context); tenant facts swap: runner/writer.ts fullTenantContextBlock (clara-benchmark #29)judge: Candidates were not judged; tenant-other judge controls failed on Oct 25, so a judge column would not count.never_do.over_share: The over-share check was not run.never_do.leaks: Every item is a tenant or a prospect by construction.cost.total_list_usd: Ran on the subscription; tokens not totalled.cost.per_item: Ran on the subscription; tokens not totalled.human_verdicts: No review set for this run.links.review_set: No review set for this run.links.results_md: Results are local run folders that carry tenant text; not linked.verdict: Slice H is a measurement for Fede; no adopt or hold until he reads it.decision: Pending Fede.What changed: No change: production as deployed today (writer claude-sonnet-5, filing classifier claude-sonnet-4-6) measured on the frozen v1 set, the baseline every refactor and model is compared to.. Tier: full (Mixed by surface. Tenant other text ran full (146 of 150; 4 door errors) and smoke (30). Prospect first email ran full (51 of the 73 that the door can rebuild) and smoke (30). Tenant repair text ran smoke only (20, every item the door can rebuild in full mode; the other 241 are frozen in light mode and were not run). Spanish is read off the rows of the other surfaces (23 full, 11 smoke), not run on its own. Prospect reply turn, renewals and voice are empty in v1.) Status: complete.
Set: Clara Bench frozen set v1, v1. 73 prospect first email · 0 prospect reply turn · 261 tenant repair text · 150 tenant other text · 421 Spanish slice · 0 renewals · 0 voice. Frozen Oct 25 in the clara-benchmark repo (sets/v1, LOCK.json with sha256 and item counts, drift test with mutation controls). Git holds ids, lineage, labels and content hashes; masked text lives only in the local store. Stay-quiet truth comes from the AppFolio mirror: an office reply in the thread within 48 h means stay quiet; anything else is unknown and stays out of the noise rate.
| Set | Arm | Items run (mode) | Noise rate: replied where staff answered in 48 h (primary) | Replied / silent | Helpful rate: replies without "told the team" | Judge vs staff reply (Clara better / same / staff better / both wrong) | Invented facts / em dash | Spanish answered in Spanish | Held by send checks | Filing vs office (both / office only / production only / neither) | Served model (writer; classifier) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenant other text v1, smoke tier | Production (today) baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 (door full mode) | 21 of 24 (88%); 6 unknown left out | 25 / 5 | 19 of 25 (76%) | 13 / 4 / 7 / 0 (not valid: judge controls failed, see caveats) | 2 / 0 | 6 of 7 (86%) | n/a (no tenant send check at the door) | filing decisions new 2, existing 1, none 27 | claude-sonnet-5; claude-sonnet-4-6 |
| Tenant other text v1, full tier | Production (today) baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 146 of 150 (door full mode), 4 errors | 82 of 96 (85%); 50 unknown left out | 119 / 27 | 72 of 119 (61%) | 66 / 9 / 29 / 0 (not valid: judge controls failed, see caveats) | 5 / 2 | 17 of 19 (89%) | n/a (no tenant send check at the door) | filing decisions new 3, existing 4, none 139 | claude-sonnet-5; claude-sonnet-4-6 |
| Tenant repair text v1, smoke tier | Production (today) baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 20 of 20 (door full mode) | 10 of 10 (100%); 10 unknown left out | 20 / 0 | 18 of 20 (90%) | 6 / 1 / 4 / 0 (judge controls 5 of 6) | 0 / 1 | 4 of 4 (100%) | n/a (no tenant send check at the door) | 1 / 1 / 9 / 6 (of 17) | claude-sonnet-5; claude-sonnet-4-6 |
| Prospect first email v1, smoke tier | Production (today) baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 30 of 30 (door full mode) | n/a (every first email gets a reply) | 30 / 0 | 30 of 30 (100%) | not judged (code checks only) | 8 / 1 | no Spanish replies | 14 of 30 (47%) | n/a | claude-sonnet-5 |
| Prospect first email v1, full tier | Production (today) baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 51 of 51 (door full mode) | n/a (every first email gets a reply) | 51 / 0 | 50 of 51 (98%) | not judged (code checks only) | 10 / 5 | no Spanish replies | 24 of 51 (47%) | n/a | claude-sonnet-5 |
| Spanish slice v1, smoke tier (rows of the surfaces above) | Production (today) baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 11 (door full mode) | 9 of 9 (100%); 2 unknown left out | 11 / 0 | 11 of 11 (100%) | 3 / 2 / 4 / 0 (not valid: judge controls failed, see caveats) | 2 / 0 | 10 of 11 (91%) | n/a | n/a | claude-sonnet-5 |
| Spanish slice v1, full tier (rows of the surfaces above) | Production (today) baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 23 (door full mode) | 10 of 10 (100%); 13 unknown left out | 19 / 4 | 12 of 19 (63%) | 10 / 2 / 4 / 0 (not valid: judge controls failed, see caveats) | 2 / 0 | 17 of 19 (89%) | n/a | n/a | claude-sonnet-5 |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Tenant other text, smoke: 2 Tenant other text, full: 5 Tenant repair text, smoke: 0 Prospect first email, smoke: 8 Prospect first email, full: 10 |
| "Check with the team" | Tenant other text, smoke: 6 Tenant other text, full: 47 Tenant repair text, smoke: 2 Prospect first email, smoke: 0 Prospect first email, full: 1 |
| Promise outside tools | blank: No code check for promises outside the tools in this run. |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: The over-share check (homes named, counts) was not run on this baseline. |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | Tenant other text, smoke: 21 Tenant other text, full: 82 Tenant repair text, smoke: 10 |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | blank: Every item is a tenant or a prospect by construction; the leak check needs non-prospect senders and was not run. |
Fable 5.1, vs the office's reply from the AppFolio mirror (blind pairwise, both orders, a win counts only when both orders agree; rubric notes the office can act in person): Tenant repair smoke 6 / 1 / 4 (Clara better / same / office better, n=11), controls 5 of 6. Tenant other text not valid: controls failed.. Per arm in the table above.
No review set was made for the baseline; Fede's Oct 24 verdicts belong to earlier runs.
not all red 23 of 32 caught. Code checks 9 of 9 per run (team-told reply in English and Spanish RED, real answer GREEN, em dash, invented amount, Spanish answered in English; each with a clean twin). Write blocker 4 of 4 planted sends and writes refused before item one, every run. Judge (office reply vs planted filler, must prefer the office): tenant repair 5 of 6; tenant other text 5 of 13, so its judge numbers do not count. Drift test: one-byte change, removed item, missing surface and planted content all go RED.
Ran on the Claude subscription. Token counts were not recorded per call, so no list price. Latency: Tenant other text, full 26.3 s median per item; Tenant repair text, smoke 15.8 s median per item; Prospect first email, full 43.3 s median per item. Whole item: door context, filing classifier, production writer turn with read tools, checks and judge.
/Users/federicochapa/code/PropFlow/clara-benchmark-wt-baseline-v1/runner/baseline.tsnever_do.promise_outside_tools: No code check for promises outside the tools in this run.never_do.over_share: The over-share check (homes named, counts) was not run on this baseline.never_do.leaks: Every item is a tenant or a prospect by construction; the leak check needs non-prospect senders and was not run.cost.total_list_usd: Token counts were not recorded per call.cost.per_item: Token counts were not recorded per call.human_verdicts: No review set was made for the baseline; Fede's Oct 24 verdicts belong to earlier runs.links.review_set: No review set for this run.links.results_md: Results are local run folders that carry tenant text; not linked.What changed: The code gate that silenced any thread a teammate wrote on in 24 h is replaced by one line stating the last office-teammate message; the model decides whether the tenant's text continues that exchange (silent) or is a separate question it can answer. Two outcomes only. Opus reply check blocks staff-run, questions-only-on-urgent and bare-acknowledgement drafts.. Tier: exploratory (Ad hoc redo of D2 with the gate replaced, before the frozen Clara Bench v1 set exists.) Status: complete.
Set: Tenant texts: inbox copy, Situs history, Spanish F set, extra Spanish Situs, pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-24. 383 recent inbox texts · 300 Situs history sample · 365 Spanish texts (F set) · 145 extra Spanish Situs texts. Same 1193 rows / 1092 distinct texts as D2. Per-set rows count rows. D3 calls the model on every distinct text (D2 skipped 653 via the 24 h gate).
| Set | Arm | Replies sent (D2 → D3) | On a staff-run thread (Fable check) | On a thread a teammate wrote on within 24 h | Invented fact / "check with team" / promise | Judge W/T/L vs paired staff, new rubric (D2 → D3) | Routine texts that warrant a reply and got one (D2 → D3) | Replies on texts triage says need a person (D2 → D3) | Drafts blocked (by) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recent texts (our inbox copy), 383 texts | Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | 14 → 15 | 0 | 5 | 0/0/0 | 5/0/1 (n=6) → 4/2/0 (n=6) | 10 → 12 of 50 | 2 → 0 | check:chime_in 1 |
| Recent texts (our inbox copy), 383 texts | Sonnet 5.5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | 8 → 11 | 2 | 3 | 0/0/0 | 2/1/0 (n=3) → 2/1/3 (n=6) | 7 → 8 of 50 | 0 → 0 | check:staff_run 2, code check 2, hold 1 |
| Situs history sample, 300 texts | Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | 14 → 12 | 0 | 0 | 0/0/0 | 1/0/3 (n=4) → 2/0/0 (n=2) | 10 → 7 of 44 | 0 → 2 | code check 1 |
| Situs history sample, 300 texts | Sonnet 5.5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | 9 → 10 | 0 | 0 | 0/0/0 | 0/1/1 (n=2) → 1/1/2 (n=4) | 6 → 5 of 44 | 0 → 0 | hold 2, code check 1 |
| Spanish texts (F set), 365 texts | Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | 15 → 21 | 0 | 5 | 0/0/0 | 5/0/2 (n=7) → 5/1/2 (n=8) | 12 → 17 of 75 | 1 → 3 | none |
| Spanish texts (F set), 365 texts | Sonnet 5.5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | 11 → 17 | 2 | 4 | 0/0/0 | 3/0/2 (n=5) → 2/1/3 (n=6) | 10 → 11 of 75 | 0 → 1 | check:staff_run 3, hold 1 |
| Extra Spanish Situs texts, 145 texts | Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | 3 → 4 | 0 | 1 | 0/0/0 | 1/1/1 (n=3) → 3/0/1 (n=4) | 3 → 3 of 22 | 0 → 0 | none |
| Extra Spanish Situs texts, 145 texts | Sonnet 5.5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | 2 → 2 | 0 | 0 | 0/0/0 | 0/1/1 (n=2) → 1/0/1 (n=2) | 2 → 2 of 22 | 0 → 0 | none |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | all arms, after: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | all arms, after: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | all arms, after: 0 |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: Over-sharing homes or counts is a prospect rule; not graded on tenant texts. |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | Opus recent: 0 Sonnet recent: 2 Opus Situs history: 0 Sonnet Situs history: 0 Opus Spanish F: 0 Sonnet Spanish F: 2 Opus extra Spanish Situs: 0 Sonnet extra Spanish Situs: 0 |
Fable 5.1, vs the paired staff reply (only an office message that actually answers the text) (blind, order swapped, paired staff replies only, new rubric (chiming in on an office-run thread loses, a hand-off is never a win)): Opus recent 4 / 2 / 0 (n=6), new rubric; Sonnet recent 2 / 1 / 3 (n=6). Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 24 of 24 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 4 of 5 graded (80%); 18 rows have a judge call. Disagree: #9. Void or re-grade: #1, #2, #3, #4. Note, no call: #5, #6, #7, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #20, #21, #22, #23.
all red 17 of 17 caught. 9 decision controls (office-run threads silent, plain repair and knowledge-only address questions reply, mass-text answer reply, outage silent), 6 reply-check controls and 2 hold-check controls all behaved as expected on both models. First pass scored 20 of 23 on Fede's examples; each of the three fixes carries a planted control. Judge remains soft on filler (staff beat filler 3 of 6 on F's Spanish set).
Decision pass at list: Opus $39.52 for 1092 calls, Sonnet $18.72 for 1091 calls, about 2.6x D2 ($15.25 and $6.78 for 439 calls each) because D3 calls the model on every distinct text. Opus hold and reply checks add $2.67 (Sonnet arm $2.64). Ran on the subscription. Per item: Opus median $0.0333, Sonnet median $0.0157 per decision call. Latency: Opus 5.5 3.4 s median, 6.2 s p90; Sonnet 5.5 2.0 s median, 2.5 s p90. Decision call only.
/private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-federicochapa-agents-001/efdb403c-4197-4ea2-967a-9f1fd47f77cc/scratchpad/bench-d3/results.mdbaseline_arm: No baseline arm: the judge compares against the paired staff reply and the D2 values sit beside each D3 value.never_do.over_share: Over-sharing homes or counts is a prospect rule; not graded on tenant texts.cost.total_list_usd: The report gives decision-pass totals per arm ($39.52 Opus, $18.72 Sonnet) and no whole-run total.links.runner: The report does not name the runner path for D3.verdict: No bar written before the run; exploratory.decision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: Reruns Benchmark G under the two-outcome tenant rules (reply or silent, no team items, stay out of staff-run threads) plus repair rules: file when no open work order matches, check the work order before adding permission to enter, never quote internal ids. Tier: exploratory (Rerun of the first episode benchmark under the two-outcome rules, before the frozen Clara Bench v1 set exists.) Status: complete.
Set: Tenant repair episodes: WS recent, Situs recent, Situs history, pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23. 261 episodes · 25 Western Slope recent · 21 Situs recent · 215 Situs history · 57 Spanish · 42 office filed a WO for the problem. An episode starts at a tenant's first repair text in a burst; texts more than 24 h apart start a new one. Office filing matched by a blind Fable label; Situs history matched by tenant name.
| Set | Arm | Filed when office filed | Filed when office did not | Same issue (both filed) | Location right (both filed) | Urgency right by written rules (both filed) | Permission to enter captured (both filed) | Duplicates of an open WO | Episodes with invented facts (judge) | Spanish texts in Spanish | Median seconds per Clara turn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 261 tenant repair episodes (57 Spanish) | Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | 8 of 42 (19%) | 10 of 219 (5%) | 8 of 8 (100%) | 8 of 8 (100%) | 8 of 8 (100%) | 7 of 8 (88%) | 0 | 1 of 261 (0%) | 11 of 11 (100%) | 5.2 |
| 261 tenant repair episodes (57 Spanish) | Sonnet 5.5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | 11 of 42 (26%) | 16 of 219 (7%) | 9 of 11 (82%) | 11 of 11 (100%) | 10 of 11 (91%) | 8 of 11 (73%) | 1 | 5 of 261 (2%) | 17 of 17 (100%) | 2.3 |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Opus 5.5 (judge, episodes): 1 Sonnet 5.5 (judge, episodes): 5 |
| "Check with the team" | Opus 5.5: 0 Sonnet 5.5: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | Opus 5.5 (judge, episodes): 0 Sonnet 5.5 (judge, episodes): 1 |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: Prospect rule; not graded on tenant episodes. |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | Opus 5.5 (judge, episodes, of 141 staff-run): 1 Sonnet 5.5 (judge, episodes, of 141 staff-run): 11 |
Fable 5.1, vs the office's real work order and actions (one blind Fable call per episode for labels and one for the judge, plus code checks): Judge overall mean 4.56 Opus, 4.38 Sonnet. Per arm in the table above.
No Fede verdicts recorded for these episodes yet; 28 episodes are on the review page.
not all red All 11 planted real writes refused (6 harness + 5 store writes). Contradicting tenant, planted emergency, and permission already on the open work order passed on both arms. Clean episode: Opus filed before asking permission to enter and added it as a note one turn later (fail); Sonnet passed. The judge caught the planted wrong unit and the made-up $185 fee.
All calls on the subscription; the report gives tokens, not dollars (Opus writer 334 calls, Sonnet 389). Latency: Opus 5.5 5.2 s median per Clara turn, 10.5 s p90; Sonnet 5.5 2.3 s median, 6.1 s p90. Writer call per Clara turn.
/private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-federicochapa-agents-001/efdb403c-4197-4ea2-967a-9f1fd47f77cc/scratchpad/bench-g2/results.mdscripts/bench-g/baseline_arm: No baseline arm: compared with the office's real actions; the G run is the before.arms.judge: The report gives a mean judge score per arm, not win / tie / loss.never_do.over_share: Prospect rule; not graded on tenant episodes.cost.total_list_usd: Report gives tokens only, no dollar figure.cost.per_item: See cost.total_list_usd.human_verdicts: No Fede verdicts recorded for these episodes yet; 28 episodes are on the review page.verdict: No bar written before the run; exploratory.decision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.controls.planted: The report lists control rows of mixed kinds per arm without a single planted/caught count.controls.caught: See controls.planted.What changed: Replays real repair episodes turn by turn with the tenant's real follow-ups and Clara's tools as write-free stubs, and compares the work orders she files with what the office did. Tier: exploratory (First episode run, before the frozen Clara Bench v1 set exists; ran under the old three outcomes.) Status: complete.
Set: Tenant repair episodes: WS recent, Situs recent, Situs history, pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23. 261 episodes · 25 Western Slope recent · 21 Situs recent · 215 Situs history · 57 Spanish · 42 office filed a WO for the problem. An episode starts at a tenant's first repair text in a burst; texts more than 24 h apart start a new one. Office filing matched by a blind Fable label; Situs history matched by tenant name.
| Set | Arm | Filed when office filed | Filed when office did not | Same issue (both filed) | Location right (both filed) | Urgency right by written rules (both filed) | Permission to enter captured (both filed) | Duplicates of an open WO | Episodes with invented facts (judge) | Spanish texts in Spanish | Median seconds per Clara turn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 261 tenant repair episodes (57 Spanish) | Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | 11 of 42 (26%) | 21 of 219 (10%) | 10 of 11 (91%) | 11 of 11 (100%) | 10 of 11 (91%) | 7 of 11 (64%) | 0 of 32 | 13 of 261 (5%) | 24 of 24 (100%) | 9.9 |
| 261 tenant repair episodes (57 Spanish) | Sonnet 5.5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | 13 of 42 (31%) | 21 of 219 (10%) | 12 of 13 (92%) | 13 of 13 (100%) | 13 of 13 (100%) | 8 of 13 (62%) | 0 | 16 of 261 (6%) | 23 of 23 (100%) | 5.1 |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Opus 5.5 (judge, episodes): 13 Sonnet 5.5 (judge, episodes): 16 |
| "Check with the team" | Opus 5.5: 0 Sonnet 5.5: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | Opus 5.5 (judge, episodes): 1 Sonnet 5.5 (judge, episodes): 1 |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: Prospect rule; not graded on tenant episodes. |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: Not counted per reply in G; the report counts posts to the team with a teammate live in the thread instead. |
Fable 5.1, vs the office's real work order and actions (one blind Fable call per episode for labels and one for the judge, plus code checks): Judge overall mean 3.49 Opus, 3.47 Sonnet. Per arm in the table above.
No review-set rows yet; 20 episodes planned for the review page.
not all red Planted real writes refused (6 harness + 5 store writes); contradicting answers, planted emergency and the judge's planted defects (wrong unit, invented $185 fee) caught on both arms; clean episode passed on Opus, failed on Sonnet (permission to enter added one turn late).
All calls on the subscription; the report gives tokens, not dollars (Opus writer 571 calls, Sonnet 593). Latency: Opus 5.5 9.9 s median per Clara turn, 15.3 s p90; Sonnet 5.5 5.1 s median, 7.5 s p90. Writer call per Clara turn.
/private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-federicochapa-agents-001/efdb403c-4197-4ea2-967a-9f1fd47f77cc/scratchpad/bench-g/results.mdscripts/bench-g/baseline_arm: No baseline arm: compared with the office's real actions.arms.judge: The report gives a mean judge score per arm, not win / tie / loss.never_do.over_share: Prospect rule; not graded on tenant episodes.never_do.teammate_thread: Not counted per reply in G; the report counts posts to the team with a teammate live in the thread instead.cost.total_list_usd: Report gives tokens only, no dollar figure.cost.per_item: See cost.total_list_usd.human_verdicts: No review-set rows yet; 20 episodes planned for the review page.links.review_set: Review page episodes not added yet.verdict: No bar written before the run; exploratory.decision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.controls.planted: The report lists control rows of mixed kinds per arm without a single planted/caught count.controls.caught: See controls.planted.What changed: Opus 5.5 vs Sonnet 5.5 on every Spanish tenant text and prospect card, with Benchmark D and A prompts. Tier: exploratory (Ad hoc run on tonight's corpus, before the frozen Clara Bench v1 set exists; not a smoke or full tier.) Status: complete.
Set: Every Spanish text and card in the corpus, pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23. 395 Spanish tenant texts · 365 run through both arms · 4 Spanish prospect cards · 0 Spanish production first emails. 395 Spanish tenant texts of 1,994 (389 Spanish, 6 mixed), all Situs; 30 dropped by the free pre-filter; 169 more in the unsampled Situs history counted, not run.
| Set | Arm | Reply / team item / silent | Reply in Spanish | Dates and times in Spanish form | Usted/tú consistent within the reply | Matches the office's usted/tú | Naturalness, 1 to 5 (judge) | Invented facts · "check with the team" · promise outside tools | Judged vs staff reply: Clara / tie / staff | Cost per text |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 365 Spanish tenant texts | Opus 5.5, full context claude-opus-5-5 | 40 / 151 / 174 | 40 of 40 | 10 of 10 | 40 of 40 | 26 of 30 | 4.53 | 0 · 0 · 0 | 26 / 1 / 2 | $0.027 |
| 365 Spanish tenant texts | Sonnet 5.5 medium, full context claude-sonnet-5-5 (effort medium) | 38 / 224 / 103 | 35 of 38 (3 repeated the reply in English) | 7 of 7 | 38 of 38 | 24 of 26 | 4.34 | 0 · 0 · 0 | 22 / 1 / 4 | $0.011 |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | Opus 5.5: 0 Sonnet 5.5: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | Opus 5.5: 0 Sonnet 5.5: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | Opus 5.5: 0 Sonnet 5.5: 0 |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: Over-sharing homes or counts is a prospect rule; the 4 prospect cards were not scored for it in the published table. |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | both arms combined: 28 of 78 |
Fable 5.1, vs the next office message (written and answered in Spanish, pairwise, both orders): Opus 26 / 1 / 2, Sonnet 22 / 1 / 4. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 0 of 4 review-set examples from this run. These rows have no judge call (code checks only), so no calibration number.
not all red All 6 planted Spanish defects caught by both the code check and the Spanish judge, and the clean native reply passed. Not all red: on the pairwise filler control the judge preferred the filler 2 of 6, both on texts where the next office message was not an answer.
About $25.16 at list. $25.16 at list on the subscription; reused Benchmark D and A outputs not counted again. Per item: see Cost per text column. Latency: Opus 5.5, full context 6.5 s median; Sonnet 5.5 medium, full context 3.3 s median.
/private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-federicochapa-agents-001/efdb403c-4197-4ea2-967a-9f1fd47f77cc/scratchpad/bench-f/results.md~/.claude/propflowai-bench-d/scripts/bench-f/baseline_arm: No baseline arm: the judge compares against the office's own reply.never_do.over_share: Over-sharing homes or counts is a prospect rule; the 4 prospect cards were not scored for it in the published table.controls.planted: The report lists code, judge, pairwise and write controls of mixed kinds without a single planted/caught count.controls.caught: See controls.planted.verdict: No bar written before the run; exploratory.decision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: v2 tenant prompt with two outcomes only (reply or silent; rule 8: office person running the thread = silent; rule 9: arrangement only a person can approve = silent), complete context, the teammate-24h rule in code, and staff replies paired only when they actually answer. Tier: exploratory (Ad hoc redo of D and F on complete context, before the frozen Clara Bench v1 set exists.) Status: complete.
Set: Tenant texts: inbox copy, Situs history, Spanish F set, extra Spanish Situs, pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23. 383 recent inbox texts · 300 Situs history sample · 365 Spanish texts (F set) · 145 extra Spanish Situs texts. 1193 rows across the four sets are 1092 distinct ids (the sets overlap; 45 more rows are one message stored under two or three Situs occupancies). Per-set rows count rows.
| Set | Arm | Before: reply / team item / silent | After: reply / silent by teammate rule / silent by model / held | Replies on a thread a teammate wrote on in 24 h | Invented fact / "check with team" / promise outside her actions (code checks on sent replies) | Judge W/T/L vs paired staff (Clara wins/ties/losses) | Routine texts that warrant a reply and got one | Replies on texts triage says need a person |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recent texts (our inbox copy), 383 texts | Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | 23 / 149 / 211 | 14 / 233 / 136 / 0 | 10 → 0 | 0/0/0 → 0/0/0 | 10/1/2 (n=13) → 6/0/0 (n=6); new rubric 5/0/1 (n=6) | 18 → 10 of 50 (21 of the 50 now go silent by the teammate rule) | 0 → 2 |
| Recent texts (our inbox copy), 383 texts | Sonnet 5.5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | 26 / 217 / 140 | 8 / 233 / 141 / 1 | 12 → 0 | 0/0/0 → 0/0/0 | 9/3/2 (n=14) → 3/0/0 (n=3); new rubric 2/1/0 (n=3) | 14 → 7 of 50 (21 of the 50 now go silent by the teammate rule) | 5 → 0 |
| Situs history sample, 300 texts | Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | 21 / 137 / 142 | 14 / 168 / 118 / 0 | 3 → 0 | 0/0/0 → 0/0/0 | 5/3/0 (n=8) → 3/0/1 (n=4); new rubric 1/0/3 (n=4) | 14 → 10 of 44 (16 of the 44 now go silent by the teammate rule) | 0 → 0 |
| Situs history sample, 300 texts | Sonnet 5.5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | 21 / 184 / 95 | 9 / 168 / 121 / 2 | 5 → 0 | 0/0/0 → 0/0/0 | 3/1/6 (n=10) → 1/0/1 (n=2); new rubric 0/1/1 (n=2) | 13 → 6 of 44 (16 of the 44 now go silent by the teammate rule) | 0 → 0 |
| Spanish texts (F set), 365 texts | Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | 40 / 151 / 174 | 15 / 200 / 150 / 0 | 13 → 0 | 0/1/0 → 0/0/0 | 16/0/2 (n=18) → 5/1/1 (n=7); new rubric 5/0/2 (n=7) | 35 → 12 of 75 (27 of the 75 now go silent by the teammate rule) | 2 → 1 |
| Spanish texts (F set), 365 texts | Sonnet 5.5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | 38 / 224 / 103 | 11 / 200 / 154 / 0 | 12 → 0 | 0/0/0 → 0/0/0 | 11/1/4 (n=16) → 3/0/2 (n=5); new rubric 3/0/2 (n=5) | 31 → 10 of 75 (27 of the 75 now go silent by the teammate rule) | 0 → 0 |
| Extra Spanish Situs texts, 145 texts | Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | not run | 3 / 96 / 45 / 1 | not run | not run → 0/0/0 | not run → 2/0/1 (n=3); new rubric 1/1/1 (n=3) | not run → 3 of 22 (9 of the 22 now go silent by the teammate rule) | not run → 0 |
| Extra Spanish Situs texts, 145 texts | Sonnet 5.5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | not run | 2 / 96 / 47 / 0 | not run | not run → 0/0/0 | not run → 1/0/1 (n=2); new rubric 0/1/1 (n=2) | not run → 2 of 22 (9 of the 22 now go silent by the teammate rule) | not run → 0 |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | all arms, after: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | all arms, after: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | all arms, after: 0 |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: Over-sharing homes or counts is a prospect rule; not graded on tenant texts. |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | Opus recent: 0 Sonnet recent: 0 Opus Situs history: 0 Sonnet Situs history: 0 Opus Spanish F: 0 Sonnet Spanish F: 0 |
Fable 5.1, vs the paired staff reply (only an office message that actually answers the text; mass texts, notices and earlier messages never count) (blind, order swapped, paired staff replies only; also scored with the new rubric (chiming in on an office-run thread loses, a hand-off is never a win)): Opus recent 6 / 0 / 0 (n=6), new rubric 5 / 0 / 1. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 24 of 24 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 4 of 5 graded (80%); 18 rows have a judge call. Disagree: #9. Void or re-grade: #1, #2, #3, #4. Note, no call: #5, #6, #7, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #20, #21, #22, #23.
not all red 4 of 4 caught. All four planted texts decided as expected under the 9-rule prompt on both models (three office-run threads silent, plain repair report reply); the 7-rule prompt failed three of them, so the rules matter. Earlier controls (write refused, send suppressed, teammate rule, pairing, usted default, word-for-word judge, hold gate) all passed. Not all red: the judge is still soft on filler (new rubric: D's staff won 9 of 10 controls, F's Spanish staff won 3 of 6).
Decision calls at list: Opus $15.25 for 439 calls, Sonnet $6.78 for 439 calls (was $24.72 and $10.51 for 947 calls each). Texts the teammate rule catches cost nothing; the hold check adds one Opus call per draft reply. Ran on the subscription. Per item: Opus median $0.0323, Sonnet median $0.0143 per decision call (complete context). Latency: Opus 5.5 5.2 s median, 8.8 s p90; Sonnet 5.5 2.3 s median, 4.0 s p90. Decision call only.
/private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-federicochapa-agents-001/efdb403c-4197-4ea2-967a-9f1fd47f77cc/scratchpad/bench-d2/results.mdbaseline_arm: No baseline arm: today's tenant writer was not replayed; the judge compares against the paired staff reply, and the before column is D/F.never_do.over_share: Over-sharing homes or counts is a prospect rule; not graded on tenant texts.cost.total_list_usd: The report gives decision-call totals per arm ($15.25 Opus, $6.78 Sonnet) and no whole-run total including pairing, triage and judge calls.links.runner: The report does not name the runner path for D2.verdict: No bar written before the run; exploratory.decision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: One call with full context decides and writes tenant replies: Opus 5.5 full context vs Sonnet 5.5 full context vs Opus 5.5 thread only. Tier: exploratory (Ad hoc run on tonight's corpus, before the frozen Clara Bench v1 set exists; not a smoke or full tier.) Status: complete.
Set: Tenant texts: inbox copy + Situs history, pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23. 383 recent inbox texts after the free pre-filter · 300 Situs history sample · 1994 triage texts. 475 recent tenant texts (WS 223, Situs 252); the free pre-filter drops 92 (19%) with no model call. Three-bucket triage ran on 1,994 texts.
| Set | Arm | Silent / team item / reply | Replies on a thread a teammate handled in 24 h | Fact-check fails · "check with team" · promise outside tools | Judge vs staff reply: Clara / tie / staff | Median sec | $ / text |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 383 recent inbox texts (WS + Situs, Sep 30 to Oct 23) | A: Opus 5.5, full context claude-opus-5-5 | 211 / 149 / 23 | 10 | 0 · 0 · 0 | 14 / 2 / 2 | 6.2 | 0.027 |
| 383 recent inbox texts (WS + Situs, Sep 30 to Oct 23) | B: Sonnet 5.5 medium, full context claude-sonnet-5-5 (effort medium) | 140 / 217 / 26 | 12 | 0 · 0 · 0 | 14 / 4 / 3 | 3.3 | 0.011 |
| 383 recent inbox texts (WS + Situs, Sep 30 to Oct 23) | C: Opus 5.5, thread only claude-opus-5-5 | 196 / 167 / 20 | 10 | 0 · 0 · 0 | 14 / 0 / 1 | 5.9 | 0.017 |
| 300 Situs texts, 2018 to 2026 sample | A: Opus 5.5, full context claude-opus-5-5 | 142 / 137 / 21 | 3 | 0 · 0 · 0 | 10 / 3 / 0 | 6.1 | 0.024 |
| 300 Situs texts, 2018 to 2026 sample | B: Sonnet 5.5 medium, full context claude-sonnet-5-5 (effort medium) | 95 / 184 / 21 | 5 | 0 · 0 · 0 | 7 / 1 / 6 | 3.3 | 0.010 |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | all arms, 111 replies: 0 |
| "Check with the team" | all arms, 111 replies: 0 |
| Promise outside tools | all arms, 111 replies: 0 |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: Over-sharing homes or counts is a prospect rule; not graded on tenant texts. |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | A recent: 10 B recent: 12 C recent: 10 A Situs history: 3 B Situs history: 5 |
Fable 5.1, vs the staff reply that went out (blind, order swapped, only where a staff reply exists): Opus full context 24 / 5 / 2 across both sets. Per arm in the table above.
Fede graded 24 of 24 review-set examples from this run. Judge calibration: agrees on 4 of 5 graded (80%); 18 rows have a judge call. Disagree: #9. Void or re-grade: #1, #2, #3, #4. Note, no call: #5, #6, #7, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #20, #21, #22, #23.
not all red Fact, promise, teammate and leak checks and the hold gate caught every planted defect and passed the clean ones; 5 of 5 write verbs and the planted send refused. Not all red: on the planted vague-filler control the final judge still preferred the filler 1 of 5 (3 staff, 1 tie), and the first judge prompt was replaced after it preferred filler 4 of 5.
About $100 at list. About $100 at list for the whole run (incl. triage of 1,994 texts and three judge setups), on the subscription. Per item: see $ / text column. Median seconds per text in the Median sec column.
/private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-federicochapa-agents-001/efdb403c-4197-4ea2-967a-9f1fd47f77cc/scratchpad/bench-d/results.md~/.claude/propflowai-bench-d/scripts/bench-d/baseline_arm: No baseline arm: today's tenant writer was not replayed; the judge compares against the staff reply.never_do.over_share: Over-sharing homes or counts is a prospect rule; not graded on tenant texts.controls.planted: The report lists 20 control rows of mixed kinds without a single planted/caught count.controls.caught: See controls.planted.verdict: No bar written before the run; exploratory.decision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: Four deciders for 'should Clara speak?': today's rule, role lookup, role lookup + teammate rule, thin prompt on Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5. Tier: exploratory (Ad hoc run on tonight's corpus, before the frozen Clara Bench v1 set exists; not a smoke or full tier.) Status: complete.
Set: Western Slope + Situs AppFolio inbox copy, Sep 30 to Oct 23, pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23. 712 inbound texts and emails · 233 prospect or applicant messages. Every message in our copy of both companies' AppFolio inbox, replayed read-only. Role at the time rebuilt from dated records: 660 of 712 from records, 34 from labels only, 4 unresolvable. Who actually answered: staff 531, nobody 169, AppFolio's own AI 11, Clara 1.
| Set | Arm | Would reply | Leaks | Prospect/applicant msgs | Left silent | …a teammate had the thread | …model said "needs the team" | Nudge a person instead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 712 inbound texts and emails | Today's rule (main, incl. #22058) baseline code, no model | 4 | 0 | 233 | 229 | 226 | – | 0 |
| 712 inbound texts and emails | Role lookup only code, no model | 233 | 0 | 233 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 |
| 712 inbound texts and emails | Role lookup + teammate spoke last code, no model | 7 | 0 | 233 | 226 | 226 | – | 0 |
| 712 inbound texts and emails | Thin prompt, Sonnet 5.5 claude-sonnet-5-5 | 12 | 1* | 233 | 222 | 218 | 143 | 120 |
| 712 inbound texts and emails | Thin prompt, Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | 9 | 1* | 233 | 225 | 223 | 124 | 142 |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | blank: Deciders choose whether to speak; no reply text was graded for facts. |
| "Check with the team" | blank: No reply text graded; 'needs the team' is a decision label, reported in its own column. |
| Promise outside tools | blank: No reply text graded. |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: No reply text graded. |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | Today's rule: 0 Thin prompt, Sonnet 5.5: 8 Thin prompt, Opus 5.5: 5 |
| Reply to a non-prospect (leak) | Today's rule: 0 Role lookup only: 0 Role lookup + teammate spoke last: 0 Thin prompt, Sonnet 5.5: 1 Thin prompt, Opus 5.5: 1 |
No judge: No judge: deciders are scored against the sender's role at the time and what staff did.
No review-set examples come from this run.
all red 5 of 5 caught. A known current tenant relabelled as a new prospect was flagged as a leak by every one of the 5 scorers; all 5 planted database write verbs were refused before any read; no sends.
889k input tokens per model; output 168k (Opus) and 210k (Sonnet) over 712 messages. Code deciders cost nothing. Per item: Opus 5.5 about $0.01 per message (plan page section 8). Latency: Thin prompt, Sonnet 5.5 4.2 s median; Thin prompt, Opus 5.5 3.6 s median. Code deciders run in under 5 seconds for all 712.
/private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-federicochapa-agents-001/efdb403c-4197-4ea2-967a-9f1fd47f77cc/scratchpad/bench-c/results.md/private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-federicochapa-agents-001/efdb403c-4197-4ea2-967a-9f1fd47f77cc/scratchpad/bench-c/scripts/never_do.invented_facts: Deciders choose whether to speak; no reply text was graded for facts.never_do.check_with_team: No reply text graded; 'needs the team' is a decision label, reported in its own column.never_do.promise_outside_tools: No reply text graded.never_do.over_share: No reply text graded.judge: No judge: deciders are scored against the sender's role at the time and what staff did.cost.total_list_usd: The report publishes token counts, not a dollar total; the plan page gives only Opus's per-message figure.human_verdicts: No review-set examples come from this run.links.review_set: No review set for this run.verdict: No bar written before the run; exploratory.decision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: Today's prompt shape vs the proposed thin shape, cost and latency only (no quality grade). Tier: exploratory (Ad hoc run on tonight's corpus, before the frozen Clara Bench v1 set exists; not a smoke or full tier.) Status: complete.
Set: Real production traces, Sep 25 to Oct 23, pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23. 481 production traces read · 10 first-email cards replayed. Traces on real customer homes after removing test homes; 10 Western Slope / Camellia first-email cards replayed through both prompts. Later-turn thin shapes are estimated from the block plan, not measured.
| Set | Arm | Tokens read, call 1 | Read from cache | Writer latency p50 | $ / turn Sonnet 5 | $ / turn Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First email | Today claude-sonnet-5 | 106.2k | 4% (1 of 71 full hit) | 17.6 s (turn 29.7 s) | 0.48 | 0.94 |
| First email | Thin, measured claude-sonnet-5 / claude-opus-5-5 | 7.2k | 14% | 4.0 s Sonnet 5 / 5.4 s Opus 5.5 | 0.032 | 0.064 |
| Later prospect email | Today claude-sonnet-5 | 95.8k | 17% | 5.9 s (turn 19.0 s) | 0.36 | 0.69 |
| Later prospect email | Proposed, estimated – | 18.8k | ~34% | – | 0.064 | 0.12 |
| Prospect text | Today claude-sonnet-5 | 94.8k | 30% | 4.1 s (turn 15.7 s) | 0.29 | 0.56 |
| Prospect text | Proposed, estimated – | 18.8k | ~47% | – | 0.051 | 0.097 |
| Tenant text | Today claude-sonnet-5 | 53.0k | 65% | 3.1 s (turn 7.4 s) | 0.093 | 0.17 |
| Tenant text | Proposed, estimated – | 18.3k | ~65% | – | 0.037 | 0.068 |
| Staff text | Today claude-sonnet-5 | 49.6k | 40% | 3.0 s (turn 14.3 s) | 0.14 | 0.27 |
| Staff text | Proposed, estimated – | 10.4k | ~45% | – | 0.031 | 0.059 |
| Handyman text (Willows only, 9) | Today claude-sonnet-5 | 95.8k | 48% | 5.6 s (turn 20.2 s) | 0.23 | 0.43 |
| Handyman text | Proposed, estimated – | 9.3k | ~75% | – | 0.015 | 0.029 |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | blank: Cost and cache run: replies were not graded. |
| "Check with the team" | blank: Cost and cache run: replies were not graded. |
| Promise outside tools | blank: Cost and cache run: replies were not graded. |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | blank: Cost and cache run: replies were not graded. |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: Cost and cache run: replies were not graded. |
No judge: No judge: the run measures tokens, cache and cost, not quality.
No review-set examples come from this run.
No controls: No graded checks in this run, so no planted-defect controls; every replay ran under the write blocker with outbound suppressed.
Prices Sonnet 5 $2 in / $10 out, Opus 5.5 $4 in / $20 out, cache read $0.20, one-hour cache write $4 / $8. Per item: see $ / turn columns. Writer p50 per turn type; two of today's Sonnet 5 replays ran 142 s and 184 s (long thinking runs).
/private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-federicochapa-agents-001/efdb403c-4197-4ea2-967a-9f1fd47f77cc/scratchpad/bench-b/results.md~/.claude/propflowai-bench-b/scratch-bench-b/today-run.ts (untracked) + scratchpad bench-b/scripts/never_do.invented_facts: Cost and cache run: replies were not graded.never_do.check_with_team: Cost and cache run: replies were not graded.never_do.promise_outside_tools: Cost and cache run: replies were not graded.never_do.over_share: Cost and cache run: replies were not graded.never_do.teammate_thread: Cost and cache run: replies were not graded.judge: No judge: the run measures tokens, cache and cost, not quality.cost.total_list_usd: The report publishes per-turn costs only, no total spend for the run.controls: No graded checks in this run, so no planted-defect controls; every replay ran under the write blocker with outbound suppressed.human_verdicts: No review-set examples come from this run.links.review_set: No review set for a cost run.verdict: No bar written before the run; exploratory.decision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.What changed: Thin first-reply prompt vs today's prompt, on Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 medium. Tier: exploratory (Ad hoc run on tonight's corpus, before the frozen Clara Bench v1 set exists; not a smoke or full tier.) Status: complete.
Set: Whole guest-card corpus + production first emails, pre-v1, ad hoc 2026-10-23. 966 past cards · 110 production first emails. 966 past cards (721 Western Slope, 232 Situs, 13 Camellia, Aug 2021 to Oct 22, 2026) and 110 production first emails (Sep 20 to Oct 23). Tables score 72 production first emails and 179 past cards per side.
| Set | Arm | Clean | Counts or rosters | Homes named 0 / 1 / many | Over 5 sentences | Held by a send check | Sec / card | $ / card |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72 production first emails | Thin, Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | 81% | 0% | 2 / 60 / 10 | 6% | 0% | 7.5 | 0.019 |
| 72 production first emails | Thin, Sonnet 5.5 medium claude-sonnet-5-5 (effort medium) | 79% | 0% | 1 / 59 / 12 | 13% | 0% | 3.2 | 0.009 |
| 72 production first emails | Today, first draft (Sonnet 5) baseline claude-sonnet-5 | 63% | 14% | 16 / 41 / 15 | 8% | 17% | 21.8 | 0.306 |
| 61 production first emails | Today, what was actually sent (after rewrite layers) claude-sonnet-5 | 52% | 23% | 1 / 43 / 17 | 10% | – | – | – |
| 179 past cards | Thin, Opus 5.5 claude-opus-5-5 | 79% | 0% | 0 / 176 / 3 | 19% | 0% | 7.8 | 0.019 |
| 179 past cards | Thin, Sonnet 5.5 medium claude-sonnet-5-5 (effort medium) | 78% | 0% | 0 / 172 / 7 | 21% | 1% | 4.6 | 0.008 |
| 179 past cards | Today, first draft (sandbox run) claude-sonnet-5 | 78% | 17% | 0 / 142 / 37 | 1% | 25% | 33.3 | 0.308 |
| 144 past cards (35 sandbox-home drafts removed) | Today, first draft claude-sonnet-5 | 90% | 6% | 0 / 131 / 13 | 1% | 10% | 34.4 | 0.311 |
| 179 past cards | Today, final email (after rewrite layers) claude-sonnet-5 | 82% | 1% | 0 / 167 / 12 | 2% | – | – | – |
| Rule | Count |
|---|---|
| Invented facts | blank: Invented policy is one of the 'clean' checks; the published table does not report it as its own column. |
| "Check with the team" | blank: The hand-off line is graded inside 'clean' (repeated in 3% of thin emails); no separate published count per arm. |
| Promise outside tools | blank: Not graded in Benchmark A. |
| Over-share (counts, rosters) | Thin, Opus 5.5 (72 prod): 0% Thin, Sonnet 5.5 (72 prod): 0% Today draft (72 prod): 14% Today sent (61 prod): 23% |
| Reply on a teammate's thread | blank: Not applicable: a first reply to a new lead has no teammate on the thread. |
No judge: The optional panel judge was not run; every grade is a code check.
Fede graded 7 of 12 review-set examples from this run. These rows have no judge call (code checks only), so no calibration number. Note, no call: #25, #26.
all red 47 of 47 caught. 47 grader checks, each with a planted mistake and a clean twin, all pass; 5 grader false alarms found by reading the worst emails were fixed and given controls. The write blocker refused one planted write and one planted send before any card.
About $63 at list. About $63 at list for the whole run, on the subscription. Prices Sonnet 5 $2/$10, Opus 5.5 $4/$20; the repo price file says Sonnet 5 is $3/$15, which would make today 1.4x higher. Per item: see $ / card column. Median writer seconds per card in the Sec / card column; thin is 3 to 7x faster.
/private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-federicochapa-agents-001/efdb403c-4197-4ea2-967a-9f1fd47f77cc/scratchpad/bench-a/results.md~/.claude/propflowai-fede-first-reply-prompt/evals/replay-harness/guest-card-corpus/first-reply/ (bench-a-report.ts, graders.ts, write-blocker.mjs)never_do.invented_facts: Invented policy is one of the 'clean' checks; the published table does not report it as its own column.never_do.check_with_team: The hand-off line is graded inside 'clean' (repeated in 3% of thin emails); no separate published count per arm.never_do.promise_outside_tools: Not graded in Benchmark A.never_do.teammate_thread: Not applicable: a first reply to a new lead has no teammate on the thread.judge: The optional panel judge was not run; every grade is a code check.verdict: No adopt / hold verdict: this is a pre-v1 exploratory run with no bar written before it.decision: Fede has not adopted a configuration.The question: when a person rates a Clara reply (a button on a shadow card in Slack, a thumb in the app, a grade Fede gives in chat), where does it go and how does the bench use it? The answer: one record, the verdict the app already stores for thumbs, now with a source and a rater; the bench reads it as the truth for the noise score and as the review set. Fede's labels outrank every other rater.
Slack shadow card ─ button ─► socket on the Mac ─ relay ─► PropFlow /api/slack/interactions ─┐
In-app thumb ───────────────────────────────────────────► PropFlow /api/grading/verdicts ─────┤──► GradeVerdict (source, rater, verdict, note)
Fede in chat ─ session writes the ledger ────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
Cerebrus and the other machine graders ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► MachineGrade (separate, machine only)
▼
Clara Bench reads both: GradeVerdict = truth, MachineGrade = candidate flags
Cerebrus, the machine grader on that arrow: what it is, what it has caught, and and the decision on it (Fede, Oct 30: D, fold) are on the Cerebrus section. Its 362 old flags are discarded (Fede, Oct 30); whether new flags arrive here as cards with these same four buttons is his open call on that section.
| Button on the card | Means | Stored as |
|---|---|---|
| Should have stayed quiet | Clara replied; the right answer was silence (a human should take it, or already had it) | verdict down, tag should_have_stayed_silent, failure kind escalate. Counts against the noise rate, the bench's headline number. |
| Wrong | Replied and the reply is wrong or unhelpful (a "told the team" reply counts here) | verdict down |
| Fine | Replied, the reply is right and helpful | verdict up |
| Better than staff | Better than what the office wrote | verdict up, tag better_than_staff |
Keyed by conversation id + message id + rater + source; a second press by the same person replaces the first. Pieces: PropFlow route and record fields (PR 1), the Slack socket relay and card update (PR 2, harness repo), buttons on the card (shadow runner, session 006), the bench read (PR 3). Status is on the asks ledger until the merged master page carries it.
Card v2, proposed Oct 25 evening (Fede: "more context, colors, remove fluff"; designed from Slack's Block Kit guide and review-card patterns in n8n, Linear and Intercom). One card, seven blocks: who and where (tenant, property, unit) · channel, time and a PropFlow link · what the tenant wrote · what Clara would say · what the office did and how long it took · one line of work order and reason · the four rating buttons plus Add a note. Colors: a left stripe by situation (gray Clara stays quiet, blue Clara would reply, amber a person already answered, purple Clara would file a work order); green and red only on the Fine and Wrong buttons. After a press the buttons become "Rated Fine by Kat · time"; if recording fails the card says so and asks for another press. Runner needs five new fields (office reply text and sender, tenant name, property and unit, channel, work order summary). Open for Fede: stripe via legacy attachment vs colored emoji in the header (recommend stripe); note via a small form vs a thread reply (recommend form). Sample posted in #updates-fede Oct 25 6:09 PM MT.
Status, Oct 25 evening MT: the app route and record fields are live in production (PR 22411 merged), the Slack relay runs on the mini (agent-smith 1472 merged, signing secret restored from SSM the same evening; it had never been on the mini). A relay-signed no-op payload got HTTP 200 from production, nothing written. Buttons are live on the shadow cards; Fede's first presses landed Oct 26 and are read back below by the bench (clara-benchmark PR 26, npm run bench -- labels).
The question: do Fede's presses on the shadow cards match the AI judge? The answer: none of the 8 cards Fede rated has a judge verdict yet (shadow cards are not judged), so the agreement rate is not measurable until a bench run judges those texts.
| Ratings, 2026-10-25 to 2026-10-26 | Count |
|---|---|
| Real ratings (newest press per person per card) | 9 |
| From Fede | 8 |
| From someone else | 1 |
| Fine / Better than staff / Should have stayed quiet / Wrong | 4 / 0 / 2 / 3 |
| Fede's downs, after silence confirmations | 2 |
| "Should have stayed quiet" on a card that already stayed silent (counted as silence confirmed, not noise) | 2 |
| Fede agrees with the judge | not measurable yet |
| Test rows left out (kept in the table, append-only) | 3 |
| When | Customer | Which Clara | What she did | Human | AI judge | Why | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 12:28 PM MT | Western Slope | Today's Clara | replies and passes it to the team | Fede: Wrong | not judged | record · msg 1237546627 | |
| Oct 26, 12:34 PM MT | Western Slope | New Clara | stays silent | Fede: Wrong | not judged | record · msg 1237579255 | |
| Oct 26, 1:32 PM MT | Western Slope | Today's Clara | replies and passes it to the team | gera: Wrong | not judged | record · msg 1237558107 | |
| Oct 26, 2:19 PM MT | Western Slope | New Clara | stays silent | Fede: Should have stayed quiet (she did: silence confirmed) | not judged | msg 1237707485 | |
| Oct 26, 2:20 PM MT | Western Slope | New Clara | stays silent | Fede: Fine | not judged | record · msg 1237652482 | |
| Oct 26, 2:20 PM MT | Western Slope | New Clara | replies | Fede: Fine | not judged | record · msg 1237641543 | |
| Oct 26, 2:20 PM MT | Western Slope | New Clara | stays silent | Fede: Should have stayed quiet (she did: silence confirmed) | not judged | record · msg 1237641217 | |
| Oct 26, 2:21 PM MT | Western Slope | New Clara | stays silent | Fede: Fine | not judged | record · msg 1237603238 | |
| Oct 26, 3:18 PM MT | Situs Group | New Clara | replies and passes it to the team | Fede: Fine | not judged | record · msg 1169769123 |
Read only from PropFlow's rating records (source slack_card), joined to the shadow card by message id and arm. The tenant's words stay on the card. Made by npm run bench -- labels in the bench repo.
Add a run: drop one JSON in artifacts/clara-bench/runs/ (shape in artifacts/clara-bench/SCHEMA.md), run node bin/render-clara-bench.mjs, commit.