Settings menu, a cleaner draft

A high-level proposal for the Settings menu, to agree before building.

2026-09-26 · draft · follows the settings redesign · nothing built yet

What is wrong today

The proposal

One menu, plain indented text, no icons, no dropdowns. In Settings, the app menu turns into the settings menu, and everything is visible at once.

Today (settings menu)

Proposed (the only menu in Settings)

Three calls for Gera

1. Menu shape

  1. Recommended: one menu. In Settings the app menu becomes the settings menu, with a back link.
  2. Keep the app menu, and make the settings menu the one indented list beside it.
  3. Tabs across the top for the four levels.

2. Name of the personal group

  1. Recommended: "Your account", with the "My" dropped from item names.
  2. "Me".
  3. The person's own name, e.g. "Gera".

3. Company or Organization

  1. Recommended: "Company" everywhere a customer reads it. Rename the leftover "Organization Settings" and "Organization admin" labels.
  2. "Organization" everywhere, including the settings pages.
  3. Leave both as they are.
Why these recommendations

One menu: two stacked menus is the confusing part; replacing the app menu while in Settings is the common pattern (Linear, Notion, GitHub) and gives the tree room to show every page with no dropdown.

No "Settings" layer: the topic pages sit directly under Company and Building, so the tree is two levels deep, never three.

"Your account": says whose settings these are once, instead of "You" plus "My" on every row.

"Company": it is the word property managers use, and 309 places in the app say it versus 67 for "Organization". The code keeps its internal name; only the words people read change. "Organization admin" as a role name would read "Company admin".

What does not change: every page, its address and its content stay as built; this is the menu and the words only.

PropFlow Docs