Parking and Utilities: eval evidence

Older records (Placeholder Flats: an older utilities split and a $50 parking price). The company's utilities answer yields no section there, and its parking cost is masked while its guest-parking answer still reads. A building's own answer (Stub Lofts: $120 over an older $90): the $90 line steps aside everywhere. Enrolled on the typed lease policy (Fixture Yards: the lease policy says $90 parking and that the resident opens electricity; the building's own answers say $120, and electricity and gas). These rows render the lease-answer grounding through the production resolver, by SMS and by voice. The grounding now points at the Parking and Utilities entries instead of restating $90, and never says "not established" for them. Main quotes $90 and only electricity. Two rows had their grader regex corrected after a first run, for correct replies it misread (spoken "one-twenty"; "paid by the tenant separately"), and were re-run on both sides. The parking proration for a verified applicant cannot be reached from this bridge (it needs a real application record), so it is pinned by unit tests in stated-by-topic.test.ts.

Byte-identical when no topic answers: lease grounding and verified-applicant facts were fingerprinted on origin/main for three policy shapes (plain, every section populated, sparse) × 2 deliveries × 3 questions, and the branch matches all 18 (pinned in the same test file). The eval buildings without a lease policy render no lease grounding on either side.