Review — the Company column across several companies

With two companies picked, each review row names its company, as the lists beside it do

28 Sept 2026 · branch review-held-emails-company-column · captured against propflow-stage · at 6ef6e72f49+local

Data note. Every name and balance below comes from propflow-stage, which is anonymized by construction (ADR-0097/0110 — phones in the impossible +1000 NPA, emails @example.test). The identical capture against prod would carry real tenants' names and balances and is not safe to attach anywhere, which is why the generator refuses to run against one.

1 · Two companies picked: the table leads with Company

Two companies picked: the table leads with Company (short code; full name on hover), the shared column tenants and work orders use. Before, the rows were mixed with no Company column.

Asserted in the captured DOM — Review · Tenant confirmation

Two companies picked: the table leads with Company

2 · Every company (staff) on stage: no rows to show a column on

Every company on stage: 0 rows, so no header row to carry a column. The every-company case is pinned by the DOM test, not this picture.

Asserted in the captured DOM — Pick a company to see tenant confirmations · No items found.

Every company (staff) on stage: no rows to show a column on

3 · Control: one company, unchanged

Control, one company: the same rows, no Company column, as before.

Asserted in the captured DOM — Review · Tenant confirmation

Control: one company, unchanged
PropFlow Docs