Pick an option on each card and press Done; your answer goes straight
back to the session. The raiser's pick is marked. "I'm not sure" is a real answer.
1Approve the attended merge of PR #17185 at exact head 00370e8f92dd (re-ask: the earlier yes named f5eddb40, and the head moved when main was merged in to clear a conflict)?
In plain terms. Can the fix be merged at its newest version 00370e8f? You said yes earlier, but the PR had to be updated to fix a clash with newer code, so your yes covered an older version. The code reviewer approved the new version with no findings; merging still needs an approval from Fede (GitHub won't let you approve your own PR), then the merge, then the one-time clean-up.
Why, and what was tried
The session raising this recommends: Yes: merge 00370e8f, then run the backfill Cloud reviewer 🟢 at 00370e8f with zero findings; the only delta from the head you approved is main merged in plus one new caller (#17001's carry step) fixed to pass the diff check. Wait for Unit Tests (affected) to go green. Backfill: gh workflow run dangerous-diff-fence.yml -f mode=backfill-open-prs (reviewer suggests a second run a few hours later). Tried first, unsuccessfully: Not routed to the decider: this is a SHA-bound re-ask of b91313717, a human-only attended merge of a dangerous-diff PR per the kickoff.
f4497981 is parked on this.
Answered and withdrawn (1)
b91313717 The fix that stops a removed 'dangerous change' label from letting risky code merge unattended is approved by the code reviewer, but because it edits the merge safety fence itself, only Fede or Gera may merge it after reading every line. Will you read it, merge it, and run the one-time clean-up afterwards? — answered: Yes: read, merged, backfill run