Everything I could decide myself is decided. What's left needs
you. Each one carries the recommendation of the session that raised it — if you
agree, pick it and press Done. A model's opinion, where there is one, appears on the card
as a receipt line; cards with no receipt were never put to a model. "I'm not sure" is a real answer and becomes work for me.
You don't need to open the session — pressing Done sends your answer back and it picks up.
1SEPARATE from b89634315 (which is about switching the detector on). Task aws-cost-rca-guardrails has met its acceptance criterion; the only remaining step is the operator skill's terminal /post-updates to #updates-gera. This session has only mcp__plugin_slack_slack__authenticate / complete_authentication and no send tool; smith-slack-post is forbidden for a personal update (posts as Agent Smith). Draft held at ~/.claude/jobs/tasks/aws-cost-rca-guardrails/POST-UPDATES-DRAFT.md. AUTH URL: https://slack.com/oauth/v2_user/authorize?response_type=code&client_id=1601185624273.8899143856786&code_challenge=9lL3LdllWum_aJJ7puI-c5brTf_rEL6TCVp_iWObdJQ&code_challenge_method=S256&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A3118%2Fcallback&state=9TYeSMi-zwKvRZyQWPWYwl9ZAMcMEP7HmsGnKtIBcio&resource=https%3A%2F%2Fmcp.slack.com%2F — the browser will error on localhost:3118; paste that address-bar URL back and I complete the flow.
In plain terms. Small one, unrelated to turning the cost detector on: do you want the usual wrap-up note posted to your own channel for this AWS work, or should I skip it and close out? I can only post it under your name if you sign in to Slack for me (one browser click). Skip means nothing goes to your channel and the write-up plus the Slack thread stand on their own.
The session raising this recommends: Skip the note, close it out Fede already has the full answer in the thread where he asked, and the RCA doc is live and linked. This closing post is a fleet convention for marking a task done-done, not information you lack. It costs you a browser sign-in to read a summary of work you can already see. Recommending skip because the value is near zero and the cost is yours — but it is your channel, so if you want the record complete it is one click and I post and close immediately. FABLE was asked, and escalated. Receipt f260417e5 — NEEDS HUMAN. ANSWERED BY ASTRA, NOT FABLE — Fable did not answer because it could not be reached.
Both passes agreed on 'Raise a block asking Gera to choose — authenticate the Slack MCP so the post can go as him, or waive the closing post and let the task close', and it is being escalated anyway: this question turns on money or a commitment to a person (matched 'waive'), which is not a model's to settle however confident it sounds.
Paid for on 2026-08-07: the unit-607 renewal rate came back RESOLVED from both passes at high confidence and was wrong — Fable found the standup ruling about the move-in SPECI…