Pick an option on each card and press Done; your answer goes straight
back to the session. The raiser's pick is marked. "I'm not sure" and "Take it to the engineering bridge" are real answers.
1
In plain terms. Should your sessions cut PRs Fede's way (up to ~600 lines, 2-4 PRs per feature) instead of your 300-line target?
The full question, as raised
Fede asks your side to adopt his PR-cutting rule: cut by what can be proven and merged alone; a fix is 1 PR, a feature 2-4 PRs (storage, logic, behavior), up to ~600 lines each, more than 5 PRs means re-cut. Your current rule is 300-line target, 1,000 ceiling, vertical slices only. Adopt his?
Why, and what was tried
The session raising this recommends: Adopt it, keep vertical slices His 600 cap and 5-PR re-cut fit your one-concern rule; his storage/logic/behavior split is the horizontal slicing your rule forbids Tried first, unsuccessfully: Compared both rules line by line; the only real conflict is horizontal vs vertical slicing and 300 vs 600 lines, which is a preference only Gera can set