Everything I could decide myself is decided. What's left needs
you. Each one has a recommendation from Fable — if you agree, pick it and
press Done. "I'm not sure" is a real answer and becomes work for me.
You don't need to open the session — pressing Done sends your answer back and it picks up.
1The building-wide calendar PR #5926 is finished and all four required checks are green, but Clara's behaviour eval suite is red (6 of 44 domains). That suite has been red on every branch that actually ran it for two weeks, and 5 of these 6 domains were already failing on an unrelated branch on 08-12. The calendar code provably cannot reach the failing areas. Ship it, or hold until the eval suite is fixed?
In plain terms. The new building-wide calendar is finished and working — one page per building showing tours, vendor visits, move-ins and move-outs together, colour-coded. The hold-up is a completely separate test suite that checks Clara's texting behaviour. It is failing, but it has been failing on everyone's work for two weeks and none of the failures involve the calendar. Say ship and the calendar goes live today. Say hold and it sits on the shelf until that unrelated suite gets fixed, which nobody is working on right now.
Fable recommends: Ship it — merge #5926 now The failures are not ours: 5 of the 6 failing domains were already red on an unrelated branch 8 days ago, and the import graph shows nothing in this PR is reachable from Clara's agent, eval or tool code. The eval check is deliberately not a required check - its own workflow header says it must never be one, and its budget design skips the sweep on most PRs entirely, so almost every Clara-touching PR already merges with zero eval signal. Holding this PR would apply a standard no PR in two weeks has met, for a red it did not cause. The counter-argument is real though: our written rule says a Clara-path PR must carry a green eval receipt, and waiving it here makes the rule easier to waive next time. Fable was asked, and escalated. Receipt f64c23a57 — NEEDS HUMAN. THE TWO PASSES DISAGREED, AND ONLY THE OPTION ORDER DIFFERED. as-given → 'Do not merge — CLAUDE.md requires a green eval receipt for any PR touching the Clara path map' (medium) reversed → 'Merge now — required checks green, eval red is ambient and unreachable from this diff' (medium) An answer a reordering can flip is not an independent judgement, it is position bias wearing one. Escalating with both readings attached.
as-given reasoning: I verified the diff is genuinely unreachable (only UI pages/an API route/tests import tour-day-view.ts and load-tour-calendar.ts; no eval, agent, or…