Everything I could decide myself is decided. What's left needs
you. Each one carries the recommendation of the session that raised it — if you
agree, pick it and press Done. A model's opinion, where there is one, appears on the card
as a receipt line; cards with no receipt were never put to a model. "I'm not sure" is a real answer and becomes work for me.
You don't need to open the session — pressing Done sends your answer back and it picks up.
1Main's CI keeps breaking because the type-check step runs out of memory on the 2-core build machine and kills the whole run — about 45% of attempts. The only fix anyone has measured to work is moving that job to the 8-core pool (PR #7808, a one-line change), which costs more per minute and is held for you. Approve the spend?
In plain terms. Our automatic code-safety checks run on a small machine that runs out of memory and crashes about half the time, which is why the shared codebase keeps showing as broken. Moving that one check to a bigger machine would fix it but costs more per minute; leaving it as-is means the codebase keeps flickering red and somebody has to babysit it each time.
The session raising this recommends: Approve — move the check to the bigger machine and accept the extra cost The cheap alternative is not untried, it is refuted: a memory cap was shipped, measured on the machine (217MB against 181MB uncapped — no difference) and reverted, and a guard now stops anyone re-shipping it. Its author's own conclusion is that no software setting substitutes for a bigger box. Fable notes the dollar figure is genuinely unwritten — nobody has computed the per-minute difference and the pool's concurrency cap could not be read — so this needs your number, not more analysis. Every red costs a fresh session and an incident. FABLE was asked, and escalated. Receipt f3b67f468 — NEEDS HUMAN. The spend authorization itself. The repo's hard floor names the founder as the only party who can approve runner-pool spend, and the dollar figure is genuinely unwritten: the 'budget headroom now exists' claim in #7808 is unsourced, the pool's 50-concurrent cap is an unverified comment (API returned 403), and nobody computed the per-minute delta. Raise it to Gera now with #7942's evidence attached — this should be a fast yes/no, not an indefinite hold. Option 2 as phrased ('live with the red') is only correct as the interim state while the raise is pending, not as a destination.