Pick an option on each card and press Done; your answer goes straight
back to the session. The raiser's pick is marked. "I'm not sure" and "Take it to the engineering bridge" are real answers.
1
In plain terms. The Vercel build-savings work is finished and everything except the actual bill is proven. The bill for the first clean day after the change can only be read on Tuesday 13 October. Waiting means this stays open until Tuesday and you get a real number; calling it done now means we close on strong indirect evidence instead, and today's figure looks like a 46 percent saving but is half a day measured against a whole one.
The full question, as raised
All seven PRs are merged and one board row remains, whose acceptance criterion is a Vercel billing figure for the first full day after merge - a day that does not close until Tuesday 2026-10-13. Nothing can be measured today without using a blended partial day the criterion excludes. Should this wait until then, or is the evidence we already have enough?
Why, and what was tried
The session raising this recommends: Wait until Tuesday Everything other than the dollar figure is already proven where you can see it: previews build only when asked and one was built end to end, a real production deploy went live under the new setting with the site serving traffic, and the wasted-build rate fell from 51 an hour to 8.9 and is still falling. Waiting costs 37 hours and nothing else; closing now would publish a number nobody has measured. Both decider passes agreed on waiting; it reached you only because the question touches money. Model receiptFABLE was asked, and escalated. Receipt f8e10cb9b — NEEDS HUMAN. ANSWERED BY ASTRA, NOT FABLE — Fable did not answer because its 5h session window is spent.
Both passes agreed on 'Rule the lane BLOCKED until 2026-10-13 07:00Z; dispatch nothing and back the check-in off', and it is being escalated anyway: this question turns on money or a commitment to a person (matched 'billing'), which is not a model's to settle however confident it sounds.
Paid for on 2026-08-07: the unit-607 renewal rate came back RESOLVED from both passes at high confidence and was wrong — Fable found the standup ruling about the move-in SPECIAL and missed the correction posted 2h21m…
bc2d2221 (adopted from a083affc) is parked on this.