Everything I could decide myself is decided. What's left needs
you. Each one carries the recommendation of the session that raised it — if you
agree, pick it and press Done. A model's opinion, where there is one, appears on the card
as a receipt line; cards with no receipt were never put to a model. "I'm not sure" is a real answer and becomes work for me.
You don't need to open the session — pressing Done sends your answer back and it picks up.
1pers_653bb3b4 (the shared morpheus-nightly bench tenant) has a stale OPEN RenewalSaga (saga_de9f5870…, state=OFFER_PREPARED, opened 2026-09-12, minted the day before PR #8251 closed the mint bug) still live in propflow-prod. It grants a spurious RENEWAL capability on every maintenance golden run against this person, causing Clara's maintenance tool calls to get cross-domain-rejected mid-conversation — the likely cause of the last several nights' shifting morpheus-nightly reds on gen-i3-pivot-ambiguity-closet-door-track / -sink-leak-pooling (3 different failure signatures across 4 nights, not a stable prompt regression). archive-bench-person-sagas.ts is the purpose-built, dry-run-verified tool (bench-fence checked: 1 saga, isTest property appfolio-45) to archive it (audit snapshot + reversible). This is a propflow-prod DDB write, so it crosses my hard-stop line for autonomous action even though it is bench-scoped and reversible.
In plain terms. A leftover test record from 10 days ago is quietly breaking Clara's maintenance replies on our nightly quality check. Should I clear it out now?
The session raising this recommends: Run the archive now Dry-run confirms exactly 1 saga, bench-fenced to the isTest property, with an audited/reversible archive path; every night it stays open keeps corrupting the quality signal these evals exist to produce Tried first, unsuccessfully: Traced 4 nights of morpheus-nightly reds on 2 scenarios with 3 different failure signatures (ruling out a stable Clara prompt regression); found both scenarios' bench conversation composed RENEWAL capability + a cross-domain tool rejection in tonight's transcript; traced that to an open RenewalSaga via GSI4 on propflow-prod (direct aws dynamodb query); confirmed via dry-run of the existing archive-bench-person-sagas.ts tool; checked failure-notes.md and blocked history — this exact SYSTEM mechanism was already flagged 2026-07-28 and escalated, and Gera's 2026-08-28 'drive all four to green' directive covers fixing it, but nobody has executed the cleanup step the tooling's own docs call for
b4a937e6 is parked on this.
2pers_653bb3b4 (the shared morpheus-nightly bench tenant) has a stale OPEN RenewalSaga (saga_de9f5870…, state=OFFER_PREPARED, opened 2026-09-12, minted the day before PR #8251 closed the mint bug) still live in propflow-prod. It grants a spurious RENEWAL capability on every maintenance golden run against this person, causing Clara's maintenance tool calls to get cross-domain-rejected mid-conversation — the likely cause of the last several nights' shifting morpheus-nightly reds on gen-i3-pivot-ambiguity-closet-door-track / -sink-leak-pooling (3 different failure signatures across 4 nights, not a stable prompt regression). archive-bench-person-sagas.ts is the purpose-built, dry-run-verified tool (bench-fence checked: 1 saga, isTest property appfolio-45) to archive it (audit snapshot + reversible). This is a propflow-prod DDB write, so it crosses my hard-stop line for autonomous action even though it is bench-scoped and reversible.
In plain terms. A leftover test record from 10 days ago is quietly breaking Clara's maintenance replies on our nightly quality check. Should I clear it out now?
The session raising this recommends: Run the archive now Dry-run confirms exactly 1 saga, bench-fenced to the isTest property, with an audited/reversible archive path; every night it stays open keeps corrupting the quality signal these evals exist to produce Tried first, unsuccessfully: Traced 4 nights of morpheus-nightly reds on 2 scenarios with 3 different failure signatures (ruling out a stable Clara prompt regression); found both scenarios' bench conversation composed RENEWAL capability + a cross-domain tool rejection in tonight's transcript; traced that to an open RenewalSaga via GSI4 on propflow-prod (direct aws dynamodb query); confirmed via dry-run of the existing archive-bench-person-sagas.ts tool; checked failure-notes.md and blocked history — this exact SYSTEM mechanism was already flagged 2026-07-28 and escalated, and Gera's 2026-08-28 'drive all four to green' directive covers fixing it, but nobody has executed the cleanup step the tooling's own docs call for
b4a937e6 is parked on this.
3pers_653bb3b4 (the shared morpheus-nightly bench tenant) has a stale OPEN RenewalSaga (saga_de9f5870…, state=OFFER_PREPARED, opened 2026-09-12, minted the day before PR #8251 closed the mint bug) still live in propflow-prod. It grants a spurious RENEWAL capability on every maintenance golden run against this person, causing Clara's maintenance tool calls to get cross-domain-rejected mid-conversation — the likely cause of the last several nights' shifting morpheus-nightly reds on gen-i3-pivot-ambiguity-closet-door-track / -sink-leak-pooling (3 different failure signatures across 4 nights, not a stable prompt regression). archive-bench-person-sagas.ts is the purpose-built, dry-run-verified tool (bench-fence checked: 1 saga, isTest property appfolio-45) to archive it (audit snapshot + reversible). This is a propflow-prod DDB write, so it crosses my hard-stop line for autonomous action even though it is bench-scoped and reversible.
In plain terms. A leftover test record from 10 days ago is quietly breaking Clara's maintenance replies on our nightly quality check. Should I clear it out now?
The session raising this recommends: Run the archive now Dry-run confirms exactly 1 saga, bench-fenced to the isTest property, with an audited/reversible archive path; every night it stays open keeps corrupting the quality signal these evals exist to produce Tried first, unsuccessfully: Traced 4 nights of morpheus-nightly reds on 2 scenarios with 3 different failure signatures (ruling out a stable Clara prompt regression); found both scenarios' bench conversation composed RENEWAL capability + a cross-domain tool rejection in tonight's transcript; traced that to an open RenewalSaga via GSI4 on propflow-prod (direct aws dynamodb query); confirmed via dry-run of the existing archive-bench-person-sagas.ts tool; checked failure-notes.md and blocked history — this exact SYSTEM mechanism was already flagged 2026-07-28 and escalated, and Gera's 2026-08-28 'drive all four to green' directive covers fixing it, but nobody has executed the cleanup step the tooling's own docs call for