Everything I could decide myself is decided. What's left needs
you. Each one carries the recommendation of the session that raised it — if you
agree, pick it and press Done. A model's opinion, where there is one, appears on the card
as a receipt line; cards with no receipt were never put to a model. "I'm not sure" is a real answer and becomes work for me.
You don't need to open the session — pressing Done sends your answer back and it picks up.
1Vercel cron /api/cron/concession-watcher (13:30 UTC) failed 0/2 with extract: 429 rate_limit_error on both properties after scraperClaudePolicy's full 5-retry budget (AutomationRun ee9743f0, 13:30:11→13:31:27Z). Fifth fire of JAVASCRIPT-NEXTJS-137 (08-15, 08-28, 08-29, 09-01, 09-15), all the same reason; #6457/#6629/#6756 widened retry/breaker and it still recurs because the cause is the ANTHROPIC_BACKGROUND_AUTH_TOKEN subscription pool being capped for days (PR #8597 probed all 8 SSM bearers: 7 weekly-capped until Sep 18/20, one 5h). backgroundClient() on Vercel rides that pool; zero bearers would bill Clara's prod ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (forbidden 07-31). The prod worker got ANTHROPIC_BACKGROUND_DEFAULT_IS_DEDICATED=1 + propflow-background-prod on 08-29; Vercel has no equivalent seam. Option A = add a dedicated background API key env read first (before bearers) in buildBackgroundClient, drift-tested, dark until the Vercel env is set; then a Vercel prod env write (secrets — human). Data intact: Lambda 13:00 run written=2, mergeConcessions never drops rows on a failed scrape — but the Lambda rides the same pool (its deploy smoke scrapes 429'd 4x this morning, JAVASCRIPT-NEXTJS-11W).
In plain terms. Should the job that reads our property websites for move-in specials get its own pay-per-use Claude key, instead of sharing subscription accounts with everything else? Each morning at 8:30 Central, a job reads the Camellia and Yale 25 websites for move-in specials so Clara can quote them. Today both reads were refused: the shared subscription accounts are out of quota for the week (shared with coding sessions; 7 of 8 capped until Thursday or Saturday). Fifth failure in a month; three earlier fixes only made it retry harder. Nothing was lost today — a second copy at 8:00 wrote the specials, but on the same accounts. The worker got its own key on Aug 29; the web app did not. Recommend A: the shared accounts re-cap every week, so waiting is not a fix?
The session raising this recommends: Give the scraper its own pay-per-use key The shared accounts are used by coding sessions and re-cap every week; the worker already got this treatment on Aug 29, and the code half is small and ships dark. Tried first, unsuccessfully: Read the run row (both refusals are quota 429s after the full retry budget, not timeouts or render failures); traced the credential path on Vercel to the shared subscription bearer list; found three merged retry fixes for this same alert that cannot help against a multi-day cap; confirmed the Lambda copy wrote today's data but on the same pool; checked open blocks — b89417046 is answered (reviewer seats) and b89459450 is the bench key in SSM, neither covers the web app's enrichment lane; I cannot set a Vercel secret myself.