Pick an option on each card and press Done; your answer goes straight
back to the session. The raiser's pick is marked. "I'm not sure" and "Take it to the engineering bridge" are real answers.
1ANTHROPIC_BACKGROUND_AUTH_TOKEN (Vercel prod) has 2 bearers; both return 429 'would exceed your account's rate limit' on concession-watcher 10-17/10-19/10-20 13:00Z and on runTraced/tenant-summary ~07:20Z daily (Sentry JAVASCRIPT-NEXTJS-1JS/1JR/1J4/1C3). Add a third pooled bearer, or audit background-lane consumers first?
In plain terms. The two Claude accounts behind PropFlow's background AI jobs keep hitting their usage limit, so the daily move-in-specials refresh and tenant summaries are failing. Should we add a third account to that pool, or find and cut what is using it up?
Why, and what was tried
The session raising this recommends: Add a third account Fastest stop to daily failures; no extra cost per the subscription pool, and the audit can run alongside Tried first, unsuccessfully: Read the last 6 concession-watcher runs in propflow-prod (3 of 4 all-429), confirmed the summary-route and runTraced 429s share the same 2-token background pool in Sentry, checked open decisions (b89479387 kept it on the shared login; b90502526 said a new account should exist) — no open block covers pool saturation, and adding a bearer is a secrets write I won't do unattended.