Everything I could decide myself is decided. What's left needs
you. Each one has a recommendation from Fable — if you agree, pick it and
press Done. "I'm not sure" is a real answer and becomes work for me.
You don't need to open the session — pressing Done sends your answer back and it picks up.
1Red main can now mint exactly one fixing owner. Eight problems found in review are fixed and pushed, and I checked all of them myself rather than taking the builder's word. It needs you to merge PR #41 and then run the deploy — until both happen, none of it actually runs. Merge and deploy now, or hold for another review pass?
In plain terms. When our build breaks, more than one helper sometimes jumps on it and they trip over each other — two agents fixing the same thing, and work getting lost. This makes exactly one get the job, and if that one dies, the job passes to someone else instead of being stuck forever. A reviewer found eight problems since I last asked you; all eight are fixed and I re-checked them myself. Saying yes turns it on. Saying hold leaves things as they are today, where a broken build is nobody's job in particular.
Fable recommends: Merge #41, then run ./deploy.sh on the mini I re-ran everything myself instead of trusting the report: both test suites (428 and 600), both type checks, and the safety-net-on-the-safety-net. The important one: I deleted one of the fixes and confirmed the tests went red — earlier, the same deletion left them all green, which is how we learned the original proof was worthless. The one honest caveat is unchanged: this repo has no automatic test-running, so those runs were mine, by hand. That gap is tracked and already owned by another task. Tried first, unsuccessfully: receipt fad5d7aff settled the DISPOSITION question — whether to stay alive and ask you rather than park or close — and told me to stay active because only a live operator catches merged-but-not-deployed. The merge itself is not delegable: it is on the never-mine list by construction, so no research settles who may merge. Receipt ffea4f685 separately settled the CI question in favour of filing issue #43 rather than editing build config. An earlier version of this same question (b86222150) was WITHDRAWN by me before it was answered, because an adversarial review landed five blocking findings and asking you to approve known-broken work would have been wrong.