I'm parked on you

Pick an option on each card and press Done; your answer goes straight back to the session. The raiser's pick is marked. "I'm not sure" and "Take it to the engineering bridge" are real answers.

17 questions on this

In plain terms. Three of the #alerts noise fixes change rules you set, so they wait for you: the deploy alarm waiting 45 minutes, fix PRs unholding themselves once the other reviewer says they are safe, and Smith dropping its 'joined' line under robot alerts. Yes merges each one on its passing review; no leaves that piece as it is today.

0 of 7 answered

1Should the "production deploy failed" alert wait 45 minutes to see if the next deploy fixes it before posting to #alerts? (propflowai#25155)

In plain terms. Can the 'deploy failed' alert wait 45 minutes before posting? A real outage would then page 45 minutes late, and if the new watcher breaks, the 'production is behind' alarm still pages within 2 to 2.5 hours.
Why the raiser recommends it
The session raising this recommends: Yes, merge it
17 of the last 19 of these posts fixed themselves within 45 minutes and nobody looked at any of them; the 2 that would still post were real stale-production cases.

2When an agent puts its own hold on a fix PR and the other reviewer later marks it safe (root fix, low or medium risk), may the hold come off by itself even after the 36-hour watch on that PR has expired? (agent-harness#1923)

In plain terms. Can a fix PR's hold come off by itself once the other reviewer says it is safe, even days later? Nobody would be watching when it lifts; it still needs the reviewer's low-risk label, the bot's green review and green checks.
Why the raiser recommends it
The session raising this recommends: Yes, merge it
41 alerts in two weeks were answered 'fix written, waiting on a person' and then nobody came; this is the main reason fixes never land.

3Under alerts posted by a robot, may Smith drop the "joined #thread" line you asked for on Oct 27 and add a ➕ reaction instead? (agent-harness#1924)

In plain terms. Can Smith react with a ➕ instead of writing a 'joined #thread' line under robot alerts? Alerts a person posts keep the full line, and the rest of the change does not depend on this.
Why the raiser recommends it
The session raising this recommends: Yes, drop the line for robot alerts
Smith wrote 87% of all #alerts thread replies in two weeks, mostly notes like this one; the reaction keeps the link without another message.

4The 'deploy failed waits 45 minutes' change (propflowai#25155) was merged at 17:43 UTC by the repo's auto-merge guard before you answered. Keep it live, or revert it?

In plain terms. Should the deploy-failed alarm keep waiting 45 minutes now that it is already live? It merged before Gera answered because nothing held it; keeping it changes nothing further, reverting puts back paging on the first failure.
Why the raiser recommends it
The session raising this recommends: Keep it live
17 of the last 19 posts fixed themselves within 45 minutes, and the 'production is behind' alarm still pages within 2 to 2.5 hours if the new watcher breaks; a revert is one PR.

5May the merge hold re-check itself when the high-risk-file check finishes, instead of staying stuck until someone re-runs it by hand? (propflowai#25205)

In plain terms. Can the merge safety gate look again by itself once the high-risk-file check finishes? A bug in this change could release a hold that should stand, so it waits for Gera; today approved fixes sit stuck until someone pokes them.
Why the raiser recommends it
The session raising this recommends: Yes, merge it
On Nov 4 it wrongly blocked 8 approved PRs at once while GitHub ran slow, and only a hand re-run cleared each; the rule itself does not change, a missing or failed check still holds.

6When a prospect texts a lease question Clara can't answer, may she say 'that's one the property team can go over with you at your tour' (Rule 7.7), even though Rule 11 says no tour offer while the prospect's concern is unresolved?

In plain terms. Should Clara stop telling prospects their unanswered question can be covered at the tour? Two of the leasing rules disagree, and the tests fail on that line until one wins.
Why the raiser recommends it
The session raising this recommends: No, Rule 11 wins: no tour mention until the concern is answered
The tour line is behind most of the remaining leasing test failures, and a prospect whose question is ignored and redirected to a tour reads it as a brush-off.

7If a prospect on text asks to talk to a person, may Clara reply 'someone from the team will reach out'? The Oct 2 ruling allows it in that case; the Oct 28 silent-handoff rule bans every line about the team.

In plain terms. Can Clara tell a prospect who asks for a human that someone will reach out? Two rulings conflict on that one sentence, and the leasing fix leaves it neutral until Gera decides.
Why the raiser recommends it
The session raising this recommends: Yes, when they ask for a person she may say someone will reach out
Saying nothing after a direct request for a person reads like being ignored; the silent-handoff rule was written for Clara volunteering it, not for answering the question.
Why, and what was tried
Tried first, unsuccessfully: Asked the decider on each: deploy alarm RESOLVED 'wait for Gera' (fc2ba6e53, alarms are on your risky list); held-fix release NEEDS HUMAN (f30dcc9cf, the two passes split on whether ADR-0078 already intends a post-expiry release); record-join RESOLVED 'ask Gera first' (f34dff244, it overrides your own Oct 27 ruling). Retro: https://docs.propflowai.co/a/alerts-noise-retro-2026-11

7225dcbe is parked on this.

Pick an option above, then press Done.
PropFlow Docs