Everything I could decide myself is decided. What's left needs
you. Each one carries the recommendation of the session that raised it — if you
agree, pick it and press Done. A model's opinion, where there is one, appears on the card
as a receipt line; cards with no receipt were never put to a model. "I'm not sure" is a real answer and becomes work for me.
You don't need to open the session — pressing Done sends your answer back and it picks up.
1Should the life-safety PM page in pagePropertyManager exempt itself from the company-live gate (the same audience:'staff' exemption already used for PM tour confirmations), or does Fede's 2026-09-16 ruling that it stay gated still hold?
In plain terms. A test call on our practice line just reported a gas leak, and the system correctly refused to email the property's manager because that test company isn't switched on yet — nobody real was affected, but a real customer being onboarded could hit the exact same silence during a real emergency. Should a gas-leak or other life-safety page reach the property manager even before the company is switched on, or should it keep being held until go-live?
The session raising this recommends: Send the page anyway, even before the company is live We already made this exact call for PM tour-booked notices (same shape: a real caller reached the line, staff gets told) — a life-safety page is the stronger case for the same treatment, but the current code deliberately does the opposite for this one sender per a named ruling two days ago, so it needs a fresh sign-off rather than a silent reversal. Tried first, unsuccessfully: Traced the alert to page-property-manager.ts's org_not_live branch, confirmed via the Sentry event (User-Agent ElevenLabs/1.0, real Twilio CallSid) and a smith-db read of the conversation transcript that this firing was the voice-harness gas-leak test scenario against the fairhaven-homes bench property (greeting literally says '(TEST)'), not a real tenant. Found the sibling fix already shipped for PM tour confirmations using the staff-audience exemption, which would close this the same way, but stopped short of writing the code because the 2026-09-16 comment on this exact sender calls the current gated behavior an intentional decision, not an oversight.