Everything I could decide myself is decided. What's left needs
you. Each one has a recommendation from Fable — if you agree, pick it and
press Done. "I'm not sure" is a real answer and becomes work for me.
You don't need to open the session — pressing Done sends your answer back and it picks up.
1The compact fix is finished and proven. It needs your approval to merge, and then it needs to go live. Right now the system can tell you it shrank a session's memory when it never did — and it says that to you on the Agents page. The fix makes it check whether the shrink actually happened before it claims it did, and shout when it did not. I re-proved it myself today rather than trusting the last watcher: I wrote a fresh test that PASSES against the old code (confirming the old code really did lie) and FAILS against the new one. All 369 checks pass, three runs in a row. The reviewer's three objections are all closed and the reviewer confirmed it. The only thing standing in the way is a do-not-merge label the reviewer put on and said it would not take off — and it is not mine to remove.
Fable recommends: Merge it, and I put it live myself right after (one command, restarts the two background services on the mini) Half of this fix is ALREADY live and the other half is not, so the two halves currently disagree with each other — merging and going live together is what ends that, and it is the only option that does. The go-live is the repo's own standard one-command step, and it is the step people here have forgotten before and left a stale version running for hours. Nothing about the change touches customer data. Tried first, unsuccessfully: Receipt f01e5a076 (RESOLVED, held under reversal, high/high confidence). I asked Fable whether releasing the hold and merging was a call I could make myself, given the work is verified and the reviewer's concerns are closed. It said no, twice over: merging is listed as never an agent's decision regardless of confidence, and the label's own text says never remove someone else's. It also rejected staying silent, because the escalation channel that was supposed to reach you points at a dead session id (cc4ad587) — so the task timeline is not the same as putting it in front of you. Its note: the closed findings make the ASK ready, not the merge automatic. Earlier receipt ff6ff1f54 independently reached the same rung and rejected deploying the unmerged branch.