Pick an option on each card and press Done; your answer goes straight
back to the session. The raiser's pick is marked. "I'm not sure" and "Take it to the engineering bridge" are real answers.
1
In plain terms. Can Smith's four paused cleanup fixes go back to normal review and merge, or does Fede want to see each one first? Fede paused them on Wednesday; they change only how Smith reports and tidies, nothing a customer sees.
The full question, as raised
Do Smith's own tooling PRs #1331, #1346, #1347 and #1341 (git-hygiene dry-run stash apply; wisdom-check treats relayed WhatsApp words as mirror rows; one PR-drive closure per merge; the seat that takes an alert stamps it) come out from under Fede's 17:40Z 10-22 'stop immediately' hold, now that he scoped the rule at 19:04Z to individual gatekeeper features being deleted, fixed or turned on? Smith applied the hold-for-review label itself at 17:40Z on the blanket reading.
Why, and what was tried
The session raising this recommends: Lift the pause; merge on a clean review Fede 19:04Z 10-22: 'I meant the individual features getting deleted, fixed or turned on. Not the whole initiative'. None of the four touches a customer-facing feature, a gate row or Clara; all four change only how Smith tidies and reports. The label came from Smith's own blanket stop at 17:40Z, before that scoping. Tried first, unsuccessfully: Not sent to fable-decide: whose hold it is and whether it still applies is the holder's call, not a model's; Fede applied the stop in his own words.