Everything I could decide myself is decided. What's left needs
you. Each one has a recommendation from Fable — if you agree, pick it and
press Done. "I'm not sure" is a real answer and becomes work for me.
You don't need to open the session — pressing Done sends your answer back and it picks up.
1PR #5675 removes a duplicate @canonical docblock left on MachineGradeCitation (types.ts) when two concurrent fixes for today's red main both merged 6 minutes apart. Comment-only, -7 lines, 0 failing checks. It sits behind a hold-for-review label that the task's standing constraints forbid me from dropping — and dropping it re-arms auto-merge, which is the merge rung. Merge it, or close it and leave the duplicate on main?
Fable recommends: Drop hold-for-review on #5675 so it auto-merges — removes the duplicate Nothing is broken today — five consecutive green push:main runs with the duplicate present — but the guard only tolerates it because entity-classification.drift.test.ts:296 boolean-tests /@canonical\b/, while that same test is NAMED 'carries exactly one of @canonical or @derived'. Anyone tightening it to count occurrences re-reds main on this exact spot. The fix is already written, green, and keeps the first-landed block; closing it entrenches a latent trap in a load-bearing contract file to save one click. Tried first, unsuccessfully: receipt fa8c02bd0 — RESOLVED, held under reversal (high/high). Fable read both PRs and origin/main's types.ts, confirmed the duplicate at ~583 and ~604, and made the latent-red-main argument above. It resolved leave-open-vs-close in favour of leave-open; the merge rung itself is yours, which is why this is here.