Pick an option on each card and press Done; your answer goes straight
back to the session. The raiser's pick is marked. "I'm not sure" and "Take it to the engineering bridge" are real answers.
1
In plain terms. Should Fede or Gera release the hold on three pull requests that got stuck for a reason that isn't true anymore? Each one got paused because it looked like it only touched documentation when it actually touched code too, so a safety check held it back. Since then, each was fixed and checked again, and all three are now green. The safety check agrees the hold can come off — but taking it off is what lets the code go live, so only a founder can do that. Should Fede or Gera release all three now, or hold them back for another look first?
The full question, as raised
propflowai PRs #20895, #20582, #19836 each carry hold-for-review applied by the docs-only-fence GitHub Action. Each PR's title/label no longer claims docs-only (retitled away from a docs: prefix, or the diff was corrected to match), so the fence's own sticky comment on each confirms the claim is withdrawn and the hold is releasable. Release is deliberately restricted to a founder removing the label -- merge IS the production deploy in this repo, so dropping hold-for-review on a green PR is the merge itself, never the bot's or the authoring session's to do. All three show mergeable=MERGEABLE with every CI check passing. This is a label-removal + merge decision, not a code change.
Why, and what was tried
The session raising this recommends: Release the hold on all three now All three are green, already re-reviewed, and the safety check's own note on each says the hold reason is gone. Tried first, unsuccessfully: Checked all three PRs' CI status directly (all green), read each PR's hold-check sticky comment confirming the docs-only claim was withdrawn and release is safe, and searched open decisions for a duplicate covering this census alert or these PRs -- found none.