Pick an option on each card and press Done; your answer goes straight
back to the session. The raiser's pick is marked. "I'm not sure" is a real answer.
1
In plain terms. Smith's own repo only lets the robot merge when the code reviewer gives a full green, but Fede already ruled that a yellow 'suggestions only' review shouldn't block a merge — should Smith's repo follow the same rule?
The full question, as raised
Smith's merge gate (agent-smith merge_gate.py:56, _VERDICT_GREEN) accepts only a 🟢 reviewer verdict; a 🟡 'changes suggested' holds the merge. Trinity relays Fede's 2026-09-29 ruling that a 🟡 never holds a merge and never earns a push (suggestions → follow-up issue; only a 🔴 or a red check justifies pushing). #829 has sat 🟡 for three rounds with every check green. Smith's root policy says 'CI green + claude-bot 🟢', so Smith can't loosen the gate itself. Should the gate change?
Why, and what was tried
The session raising this recommends: Smith merges on a yellow review too; suggestions become follow-up tickets It matches the ruling Fede already made for propflowai and measured as the biggest share of open-PR hours; Smith's repo should run the same rule, not a stricter private one. The gate still requires every check green, a fresh verdict on the current head, and zero unresolved threads. Tried first, unsuccessfully: Tried: read the gate (_VERDICT_GREEN = ('🟢',), VERDICT_NIT holds); confirmed root policy pins 🟢 so the edit is out of Smith's scope; #829 rounds 3–5 each 🟡 with no blocking finding, 5 checks green, 0 open threads. Nits filed as agent-smith#841.