I'm parked on you

Pick an option on each card and press Done; your answer goes straight back to the session. The raiser's pick is marked. "I'm not sure" and "Take it to the engineering bridge" are real answers.

1

In plain terms. Should Clara be able to see her own reply while it is waiting for a teammate to approve it? Right now she cannot, so on her next message she either repeats the whole answer or acts as though she never answered. Yes means she sees it, marked as not sent yet, and stops repeating herself to residents and prospects; no means she keeps double-answering until Fede or Gera decides.
The full question, as raised

When Clara's reply to a resident, prospect or vendor is waiting for a teammate to approve it, she cannot see that reply in her own history. So on her next turn she either says the whole thing again or acts as though she never answered. This change lets her see it, marked as written but not sent yet. Nothing about what anyone receives changes, and nothing sends any earlier. It is finished, reviewed clean, and has been held for Fede for five days. Does Fede want it to go out?

2 other sessions waiting on this same answer.

Why, and what was tried

WHAT WAS FOUND AND FIXED WHILE BUILDING THIS, because it belongs in the same breath. Because Clara can now see her held reply, she correctly stops repeating it. But on email, the older waiting reply was then thrown away with a note nobody was pointed at. A prospect told 'Saturday at 11 works, you are booked' who then asked about pets would never have heard the tour time. The reviewer caught it, not this session. It is fixed, it has a test that fails without the fix, and it went live in production today. ONE KNOWN GAP, LOGGED WITH AN OWNER, NOT FIXED HERE: if a teammate rejects a waiting reply, it goes back to reading as though it was sent. Same family as the bug above. It needs a change on a path this work does not own, so it is tracked separately rather than bundled in late. WHAT THE EVIDENCE DOES AND DOES NOT SHOW: the test case for the newest situation scores the same with and without the fix, so it guards against the problem coming back rather than proving the fix works. What shows it works is that the text Clara is given differs in both places it is built, on exactly the affected case, and is identical on all eight others, plus a guard that goes red if the fix is deleted. The overall score moved within noise on identical text, so it should not be read as a change. STILL OWED AFTER RELEASE: one real end-to-end on a live send path, which for email runs after deploy rather than before. THE COST OF THE WAIT, and this is not an argument to say yes: five days held, and the main branch moved underneath it twice, each time needing a repair and a fresh review round on a reviewer pool that is a single account.

The session raising this recommends: Yes, let it go out now
It changes only what Clara can see of her own waiting reply, never what a person receives or when anything sends; the matching change for texts has been live since yesterday with no issue, and the one real problem found while building this is already fixed and live in production.
Tried first, unsuccessfully: Fable ruled twice on this, both times with its two reversed passes agreeing. Receipt ff4cab4bc: releasing this is a founder's call and must come to Fede, because the instruction naming him came from a person rather than from a rule a session derived, and because the finish line for this work was written as held for his review. Receipt fec4b9a41: an earlier version of this question had gone stale and was withdrawn, and its ruling said to fix the two real problems first and then bring exactly one accurate question. Both problems are now fixed. Fable also noted, and this session passes it on as a fact rather than as a push, that the 2026-09-29 amendment to the operating constitution treats improving behaviour that is already live as a fix rather than as switching a feature on, so this may be a quick yes - but that argument is Fede's to apply, not this session's.

0368f497 is parked on this. 2 other sessions waiting on this same answer.

Asked by more than one session. Your answer above goes back to all of them.

190dd264 frozen pane asked it this way:
Do you want to proceed?

57769700 frozen pane asked it this way:
Do you want to proceed?

Answered and withdrawn (3)
Pick an option above, then press Done.
PropFlow Docs